Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,603
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Coastal Storm Discussion...April 22-23, 2012...


ag3

Recommended Posts

Saturday has the best chance for that to happen as the cold front moves through. Models show decent precip (1/4 to 1/2") with slightly negative LI and marginal CAPE/bulk shear.

Don't think he was talking about severe just regular thunder. Usually present in those strong fronts. The further west it comes the more likely it'll be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 810
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Don't think he was talking about severe just regular thunder. Usually present in those strong fronts. The further west it comes the more likely it'll be.

The risk of severe is low in this case, but there should still be regular thunderstorms which is what I was pointing out. If the QPF amounts modeled verify there would be heavy rain with these thunderstorms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SREF has hinted at every possible solution with this storm like every other model.

The other models haven't gone from one scenario to another with each run like the SREF tends to do on occasion. The other models at least maintain some level of consistency between run to run instead of jumping back and forth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How's the wind situation?

The NAM has 25-30kts at 10m. But I am more interested in the very impressive low level jet. Look at H85 temperatures (top right) -- you can almost tell where the nose of it is from that image itself. Good thermal packing too directly over NYC with 0c H85 temps over NW NJ and 10c H85 temps over Long Island.

With a 988mb surface low due south of Long Island and the upper air system closing off aloft to our west -- the dynamics and low level moisture feed will be ripped northwest towards our area. A pretty good set up for high rain amounts and widespread flooding if it weren't for the drought we are in (we could still see some -- but with a wet ground or above normal precip departures we would be in real trouble should the NAM verify).

f84.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...