ohleary Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Invest 91L. Book it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srain Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usedtobe Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Looks like a nice vertically stacked low that's strength increases with height. Wake me up when it gets convection near its center. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurricaneJosh Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Omg, this is my favorite breeding ground for tropical cyclones. This area of the N Atlantic produces real quality systems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PSUBlizzicane2007 Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 On 4/17/2012 at 6:23 PM, ohleary said: Invest 91L. Book it. Please only post about such items when there is something relevant to discuss... otherwise post about it in the 2012 seasonal thread that already exists. Mods please merge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohleary Posted April 17, 2012 Author Share Posted April 17, 2012 On 4/17/2012 at 8:28 PM, PSUBlizzicane2007 said: Please only post about such items when there is something relevant to discuss... otherwise post about it in the 2012 seasonal thread that already exists. Mods please merge. That thread is a general 2012 thread. This is about a specific invest system discussion. I think an invest system that the NHC has requested GFDL/HWRF runs on is relevant to discuss. If you don't, feel free to not click on this thread. Please keep your attitude in OT. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurricaneJosh Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 On 4/17/2012 at 8:36 PM, ohleary said: That thread is a general 2012 thread. This is about a specific invest system discussion. I think an invest system that the NHC has requested GFDL/HWRF runs on is relevant to discuss. If you don't, feel free to not click on this thread. Please keep your attitude in OT. Thanks. I'm cool with whatever-- no biggie-- but a couple of things: * If an invest is a real piece of crap that has very little potential and is unlikely to be discussed much, we don't always start a new thread about it. Sometimes we just discuss such low-potential systems in the main thread. * If a new thread is started, the title of the thread = the name of the system. So, for example, this thread would be called "Invest 91L". That makes the forum more user-friendly, as the user will know what this thread is about before even clicking it. The current title seems more generic. Just some food for thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aslkahuna Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 Looks like a subtropical ULL to me but since it IS the first Invest of 2012 in the ATL I would say it's worthy of discussion. Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PSUBlizzicane2007 Posted April 17, 2012 Share Posted April 17, 2012 On 4/17/2012 at 11:05 PM, HurricaneJosh said: I'm cool with whatever-- no biggie-- but a couple of things: * If an invest is a real piece of crap that has very little potential and is unlikely to be discussed much, we don't always start a new thread about it. Sometimes we just discuss such low-potential systems in the main thread. * If a new thread is started, the title of the thread = the name of the system. So, for example, this thread would be called "Invest 91L". That makes the forum more user-friendly, as the user will know what this thread is about before even clicking it. The current title seems more generic. Just some food for thought. This. Let's stick to the system we had last year... that worked really well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohleary Posted April 18, 2012 Author Share Posted April 18, 2012 On 4/17/2012 at 11:05 PM, HurricaneJosh said: I'm cool with whatever-- no biggie-- but a couple of things: * If an invest is a real piece of crap that has very little potential and is unlikely to be discussed much, we don't always start a new thread about it. Sometimes we just discuss such low-potential systems in the main thread. * If a new thread is started, the title of the thread = the name of the system. So, for example, this thread would be called "Invest 91L". That makes the forum more user-friendly, as the user will know what this thread is about before even clicking it. The current title seems more generic. Just some food for thought. Title fixed for you Josh. Potential mass-confusion averted. This is a low-potential system, but it is noteworthy in that it's April and I found it interesting they wanted model runs on it. I was actually very surprised to hear from them this afternoon. I had to look and see what the heck we were running on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srain Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 On 4/18/2012 at 12:53 AM, ohleary said: Title fixed for you Josh. Potential mass-confusion averted. This is a low-potential system, but it is noteworthy in that it's April and I found it interesting they wanted model runs on it. I was actually very surprised to hear from them this afternoon. I had to look and see what the heck we were running on. Has the HWRF upgrade been implemented? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurricaneJosh Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 On 4/17/2012 at 11:36 PM, PSUBlizzicane2007 said: This. Let's stick to the system we had last year... that worked really well. Gracias. I do feel the tropical community here has a good system down after trying various approaches over the years. Things work really well now, I think. On 4/18/2012 at 12:53 AM, ohleary said: Title fixed for you Josh. Potential mass-confusion averted. I do think that's better. On 4/18/2012 at 12:53 AM, ohleary said: This is a low-potential system, but it is noteworthy in that it's April and I found it interesting they wanted model runs on it. I was actually very surprised to hear from them this afternoon. I had to look and see what the heck we were running on. Oh, I hear ya. And, for the record: while the system is hella boring to me, I can completely understand that others find it conversation-worthy. (Well... kinda. ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohleary Posted April 18, 2012 Author Share Posted April 18, 2012 On 4/18/2012 at 1:03 AM, Srain said: Has the HWRF upgrade been implemented? Looks like the GFDL/HWRF upgrades are tentatively scheduled for mid-May. This page is usually pretty up-to-date: http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/changes/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dtk Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 On 4/18/2012 at 1:03 AM, Srain said: Has the HWRF upgrade been implemented? No, 15 May. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Lizard Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Adam was posting about this back on April 9th. There is a reason he is the most beloved green/red tagger outside of severe weather season and regional subforums. Canadian gets it weakly shallow warm core. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurricaneJosh Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 Well, so much for that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.