meteorologist Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 http://www.ipcc-wg2.gov/SREX/images/uploads/SREX-All_FINAL.pdf http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/03/29/ipcc_srex_thermageddon/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeatherRusty Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 http://www.ipcc-wg2....X-All_FINAL.pdf http://www.theregist...x_thermageddon/ Why did you provide the second link? The scumbag lying deniers are at it again. Zunli Lu: “It is unfortunate that my research, “An ikaite record of late Holocene climate at the Antarctic Peninsula,” recently published in Earth and Planetary Science Letters, has been misrepresented by a number of media outlets. SEE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 Why did you provide the second link? The scumbag lying deniers are at it again. Zunli Lu: “It is unfortunate that my research, “An ikaite record of late Holocene climate at the Antarctic Peninsula,” recently published in Earth and Planetary Science Letters, has been misrepresented by a number of media outlets. SEE How is that relevat to the IPCC report? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeatherRusty Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 How is that relevat to the IPCC report? Exactly! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LakeEffectKing Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 How is that relevat to the IPCC report? Why does Rusty get to throw threads off topic?? His link and comment should be put in another thread. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeatherRusty Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 Why does Rusty get to throw threads off topic?? His link and comment should be put in another thread. Thanks. The twisted logic machine is at work here going full bore. I threw the tread off topic? The OP second link threw the thread off topic. The second link is so off topic and full of stawman arguments it's enough to make your head spin. EDIT: I get it now. The original second link that first went up pointed to this story. The link has been subsequently changed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LithiaWx Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 leaving aside the facts that (1) the links have already been posted to the 2 versions of the reports, and (2) messenger is 100% troll, did you bother to read the dross he had in the second link? you should be asking why messenger is allowed to constantly troll this forum with nonsense. Do you mean meteorologist the OP? He doesn't follow up with his topics very often but I wouldn't call that trolling. He just wants to see the discussion that follows. He also gave a decent sized donation during the drive which should also be taken into account. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LithiaWx Posted March 30, 2012 Share Posted March 30, 2012 so money buys legitimacy and facts on a science-based board? really? He's not part of some big misinformation campaign. The fact he donated to the board shows his interest in the success of the place and the enjoyment he gets from it. The donation didn't buy him anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.