SnowMan Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 NE MA - SE NH jackpot? Yes please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 29, 2012 Author Share Posted February 29, 2012 holy crap 2nd part really delivers i really hope this is not just NAM on crack and GFS/EURO catch up by tonight I wish the Euro ran every 6 hours and the NAM every 12, but the NAM is such a weenie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 It's not going to matter for anyone north of the SNH/MA border but that's a big jump north on 1000/850 CTs this run on the NAM. Kind of a trend toward the GFS actually, though not as extreme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Torchey Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Carnage for boston metro west nw and n..........complete carnage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaineJayhawk Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Rays getting smoked Certainly a Celica Crusher in E Mass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Thats a huge crapshoot on the NAM for part 2 south of the pike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterLand Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 NAM is slow to update... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Torchey Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Nam is similiar to the Gfs in many ways, just not qpf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Clown maps are sick, man if only Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 lol...you're not supposed to measure/clear more than every 6 hours anyways. Oh good...further enhances my point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 What a porn run for interior NE MA to around Will. Take a look at the 21z ETA. LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherMA Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 lol...you're not supposed to measure/clear more than every 6 hours anyways. Or be a weenie and measure every hour because you want to know totals every hour but only clear every 6-12 hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherMA Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Take a look at the 21z ETA. LOL. link? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Nam is similiar to the Gfs in many ways, just not qpf. NAM has a wet bias, too. Thermal profiles starting to line up...NAM is probably overdoing qpf per its bias. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattb65 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Kind of a trend toward the GFS actually, though not as extreme. More of a trend towards consensus regarding the temp profile alone imo. It was the coldest model before and it's shifted slightly warmer. From what I saw at 18z I thought the GFS moved a touch colder. I'd bet we see the GFS coming up to also inch a bit colder too. Obviously the QPF NAM is kinda on its own here, although maybe some of the other mesos will keep spitting out really big QPF like the RGEM. SREFs have a lot of members with big QPF like the NAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 That cold air CAD tuck on previous NAM runs at H85 is much weaker on this run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 On phone. Should I be nude? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 I do measure every hour...I don't have a snowboard and actually this is the first year since I've lived where I live that I can actually merasure in my yard b/c sicne the Oct storm I have less blockage in my yard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Full 24hr snowfall for the east slope of the Berks. So pretty and still ripping at 42hrs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highways1 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 I think there was one 21z SREF, ETA 5 that was something like 2" QPF. Definitely some super weenies in there although I admittedly didn't check its thermal profile. I still would probably cut the NAM's amounts by 25 or so percent just given the lack of support from other guidance and its inherent wet bias. Even with that, this would be our best storm of the year inside 128 by far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 29, 2012 Author Share Posted February 29, 2012 NAM has a wet bias, too. Thermal profiles starting to line up...NAM is probably overdoing qpf per its bias. AFT?As forky thought? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 On phone. Should I be nude? Absolutely naked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 More of a trend towards consensus regarding the temp profile alone imo. It was the coldest model before and it's shifted slightly warmer. From what I saw at 18z I thought the GFS moved a touch colder. I'd bet we see the GFS coming up to also inch a bit colder too. Obviously the QPF NAM is kinda on its own here, although maybe some of the other mesos will keep spitting out really big QPF like the RGEM. SREFs have a lot of members with big QPF like the NAM. Yeah, NAM has a wet bias too so consensus is slowly emerging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 On phone. Should I be nude? Until 6z, yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherMA Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Thats a huge crapshoot on the NAM for part 2 south of the pike. Yeah right on the line here. But cant complain if I don't get in on it considering I jackpot with the WWA if the nam/srefs are right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Very snowy Thursday verbatim. Bona fide secs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Torchey Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 NAM has a wet bias, too. Thermal profiles starting to line up...NAM is probably overdoing qpf per its bias. um thats what im saying, nam is very qpf happy:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 29, 2012 Author Share Posted February 29, 2012 On phone. Should I be nude? You would strip for the NAM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 link? http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/ETAEAST_0z/etaloop.html Bookmark the E-Wall site. Great quick toggling back and forth there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 On phone. Should I be nude? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.