Arnold214 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Did that for several stations Ginx. Nothing shows up in the box. Clicked Total Snow, All models, etc etc Dumb founded...lol... anyway, might not work with Windows 7? What browser are you using? I couldn't get it to work with my version of IE...but firefox worked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Go on the map and find a station thats close to you and click on it Okay--and then I get a white screen with parameters/models that can be selected. Nothing happens when I click on them. Apparently Dave and I get an "F" in intuitive reasoning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Well its the srefs, But we should be in its range, Will see at 21z in about 40 mins Yeah, the Srefs haven't exactly been stellar this season, but I mean they've been a steady 7-8" for the last 3 runs up here. You watch, 21z will be 3"-4" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 29, 2012 Author Share Posted February 29, 2012 What browser are you using? I couldn't get it to work with my version of IE...but firefox worked. IE 9... I will try it on something else. Thanks. Ginxy showed me some tasty FIT plots Looks good for you guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 What browser are you using? I couldn't get it to work with my version of IE...but firefox worked. IE, ftl. Firefox, ftw. Thx. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Okay--and then I get a white screen with parameters/models that can be selected. Nothing happens when I click on them. Apparently Dave and I get an "F" in intuitive reasoning. Didnt work for me on google chrome, but works with Firefox on Windows 7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Why does anyone use IE anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Chrome FTW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Why? I think the NAM is over doing the WAA thump, has the right idea of the vortmax going along or south of the south coast due to the under forecast confluence to the NE, which allows for cold air to drain in from Nova Scotia. The GFS tracks the vort over SNE, which allows the warm punch to advance farther north. NAM has a wet bias however, which is why I'm taking GFS qpf right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 I did. I tried clicking the map, and using the dropdown. It is not plotting. Nothing shows up in the 2 model boxes either. it does say this at the top: "Ensemble plume for Ptype-POP at FIT from 15 UTC NCEP SREF." Tried it for FIT, ORH, BOS, etc Maybe there is so much snow it doesn't fit...lol Okay--and then I get a white screen with parameters/models that can be selected. Nothing happens when I click on them. Apparently Dave and I get an "F" in intuitive reasoning. You guys are so far out in the willy whackers, What are you using for a browser? I am using firefox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Chrome FTW I love Chrome, but it didn't work for me. Weird. Had to use FF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Nice---that shows a mean of 1.0" at ORE. A couple crappy outliers bringing it down from clustering from the mean up to 1.3". Same mean for AQW, but a little more even a spread. Either way--spells 'N-I-C-E' along the trail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 I love Chrome, but it didn't work for me. Weird. Had to use FF. Interesting. When I look at Miley World I actually have to use Firefox b/c the page doesn't load on Chrome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoob40 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Seems about right. http://www.wggb.com/weather_files/S2_NORTHEAST_WEATHER_ALERTS.jpg.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil882 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 I'll post my detailed thoughts later tonight, but we are still walking a fine line between what could be a significant snowstorm, and a significant disappointment. The high snowfall totals in Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Southern Mass are totally dependent on the initial batch of WAA associated with a coupled jet streak for the majority of their snowfall. Many of these locations should change over to sleet/freezing rain mix at some point wednesday night thanks to a 800 hPa level warm nose thats shows up in the cold NAM soundings, despite the 850 hPa remaining below freezing. If the initial batch ends up being on the weaker side, like the 12z ECMWF and GFS were suggesting, than lower end advisory criteria would be more likely to verify in these locations. In addition to the warm nose, there won't be much moisture in the dendritic growth layer the further south you go, with the majority of the forcing located further north along the baroclinic zone. The biggest questions mark at this time are the locations between the Hudson River Valley across central Mass. This is where the 800 hPa line will roughly bisect the region at its furthest northward extent. At the same time, this area will also have the best frontal forcing, so its not too surprising this is where we see the greatest precipitation amounts from 06z though 18z on Thursday. This area could potentially pick up another 3-6 inches of snowfall if the profile is just cold enough to support it. I've said this before, but it will ultimately come down to minor shifts in the guidance that could be the difference between 6-12" of snowfall, and 2-4" with sleet and freezing rain on top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Seems about right. http://www.wggb.com/...ALERTS.jpg.html Classic springfield forecast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snow Bow Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Didnt work for me on google chrome, but works with Firefox on Windows 7. odd worked for me on chrome for the last week or so no problems, had to use ie earlier today and I couldn't stand it now that ive been using chrome. The mean for CON at last check was 10.49 lowest being 7.3 and highest around 14. There were only 4 members around 7 the rest were clustered around the mean and above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Well its the srefs, But we should be in its range, Will see at 21z in about 40 mins Well, according to Will, they are #2 in QPF scores, so I am sure we will find out in about ~30 mins where we're at and how good they really are. Even on the mean, it gave most of SNE 0.5-1" of snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Seems about right. http://www.wggb.com/...ALERTS.jpg.html Pretty much in line with my thoughts, actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 odd worked for me on chrome for the last week or so no problems, had to use ie earlier today and I couldn't stand it now that ive been using chrome. The mean for CON at last check was 10.49 lowest being 7.3 and highest around 14. There were only 4 members around 7 the rest were clustered around the mean and above. Yeah they are really bullish with the qpf, and therefore snowfall. Curious to see if they are temped at 21z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Well, according to Will, they are #2 in QPF scores, so I am sure we will find out in about ~30 mins where we're at and how good they really are. Even on the mean, it gave most of SNE 0.5-1" of snow. Yeah, I remember him saying that, But i think he said they have not been as good this year i think, But i could be wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OKpowdah Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 BTW...these SREF graphics are courtesy of SPC's Greg Carbin. http://www.spc.noaa....lumes/index.php This is awesome! I've never seen it before. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOOTH Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 Double digits on the mean at IZG, SFM and PWM. Is good. Fun to watch unfold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherMA Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 If the 18z nam verified HFD to TOL to ORH could be a 12/13/07 like commute. BIG IF, but it has that potential if the NAM were to verify. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 29, 2012 Author Share Posted February 29, 2012 That plume thing works for me now in Firefox Funny thing is I had firefox for a while then deleted it a year or so ago, so I reloaded it. Did not import my bookmarks correctly, though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 At 15z on the Srefs the mean was .84" qpf, 10.57" on snow total, It has been consistantly over .8 all 3 runs so far here today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 More weather, less OT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 29, 2012 Author Share Posted February 29, 2012 You guys are so far out in the willy whackers, What are you using for a browser? I am using firefox Usually use IE, now am using firefox and it works I also use Safari on iPod, Opera on the Wii, and whatever my Nook uses...lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 At 15z on the Srefs the mean was .84" qpf, 10.57" on snow total, It has been consistantly over .8 all 3 runs so far here today Right...but the Srefs have been in one camp right down to the wire and then bailed last minute to fall into place with other guidance, so we will see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 29, 2012 Share Posted February 29, 2012 That plume thing works for me now in Firefox Funny thing is I had firefox for a while then deleted it a year or so ago, so I reloaded it. Did not import my bookmarks correctly, though I had to google the directions to get my bookmarks over, You had to save them then convert them here on this to an html file.. http://www.linkagogo...format=netscape Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.