Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,610
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Chargers10
    Newest Member
    Chargers10
    Joined

Help us Obi-One-Marchobi... You're our only hope 3/1 Fantasy


HoarfrostHubb

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Disappointing set of runs today.

Eh, not really, for me anyway... If one were not expecting success than the lack there of becomes entirely routine.

Enduring a winter failing to get snow 30 some-odd different ways - it seems failing to snow must somehow beget failing to snow.

Is there a physical cause? Who knows - probably just an unrelenting bad luck series.

In the study of chaos/fractals, apparent patterns of organization will spontaneously emerge, and then decay in time, giving the illusion of order. In this case, the randomness that is the weather just pulled off the very low probability - the "negativity lottery" ha. There may have been 1% chance of a winter like this happening - fair enough probability considering that the only winter worse than this in the last 100 years was that mid 1930's Shawshanking..

Even the best hitters in Baseball have cold streaks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if the initial wave of precip is suppressed or strung out (still a big if)...I think at some point there will be a decent slug of precip moving in. That's a lot of energy still off the to west and that has to move east...its not a uber weak strung out vortmax like on 1/21 this year. That's a bomb out in the plains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the first batch on Wednesday is clearly heading into the crapper very similar to last time. Someone will get lucky like CT got lucky then. I see the NAM is so juicy for everyone, but it has zero credibility.

In any other winter this is a mundane forgettable event. This year I guess I'll savor whatever we get....has to beat the 0.1" I got on Friday morning right.

This one had never been for NNe. Always been for cne and Sne

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if the initial wave of precip is suppressed or strung out (still a big if)...I think at some point there will be a decent slug of precip moving in. That's a lot of energy still off the to west and that has to move east...its not a uber weak strung out vortmax like on 1/21 this year. That's a bomb out in the plains.

As long as it can slide under us, I'll be happy. I wasnt a big fan of the euro depiction, but that doesn't mean much at 100+ hrs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if the initial wave of precip is suppressed or strung out (still a big if)...I think at some point there will be a decent slug of precip moving in. That's a lot of energy still off the to west and that has to move east...its not a uber weak strung out vortmax like on 1/21 this year. That's a bomb out in the plains.

You'd think so but ... but at some point, seeing any plausible means to annihilate snow from occurring as being a persistence in its self, regardless of "why" that is ...

Put it this way, a familiar definition for insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. I don't think it is too crazy then to assume this fumbles around and f* up by means of finding least probability to ensure that happens.

Case in point; that storm that escaped seaward over the lower MA that was originally supposed to be a big snow bombing blizzard up this way ... That storm had 0 business exiting at that longitude during a +2 NAO anomaly. It's just an interesting year where it can't snow and it is what it is...

At this point, personally I'm resolute in assuming its not going to happen, sans any reasoning why - that's part of the torture game. Not going play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'd think so but ... but at some point, seeing any plausible means to annihilate snow from occurring as being a persistence in its self, regardless of "why" that is ...

Put it this way, a familiar definition for insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. I don't think it is too crazy then to assume this fumbles around and f* up by means of finding least probability to ensure that happens.

Case in point; that storm that escaped seaward over the lower MA that was originally supposed to be a big snow bombing blizzard up this way ... That storm had 0 business exiting at that longitude during a +2 NAO anomaly. It's just an interesting year where it can't snow and it is what it is...

At this point, personally I'm resolute in assuming its not going to happen, sans any reasoning why - that's part of the torture game. Not going play.

Well its certainly good to keep expectations low...no argument there. I'm reasonably optimistic about some snow from this given the time frame...I'm not going to start expecting a big 6-10 event though until there is reason to.

I think people forget just how far out 4-5 days is...we are nearing the 3 day threshold for the front end of this event...but even that is an eternity. In a year where snow is so scarce, people tend to look much further out on model guidance than is really even prudent unless they are well aware of the probabilistic nature of models in that time frame....which isn't easy for everyone because they are looking at deterministic solutions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just gonna be haves and have nots..... Someone gets between the two maxes.

Unlike last time, nobody gets rain at leas...save maybe the Cape or something.

Well its certainly good to keep expectations low...no argument there. I'm reasonably optimistic about some snow from this given the time frame...I'm not going to start expecting a big 6-10 event though until there is reason to.

I think people forget just how far out 4-5 days is...we are nearing the 3 day threshold for the front end of this event...but even that is an eternity. In a year where snow is so scarce, people tend to look much further out on model guidance than is really even prudent unless they are well aware of the probabilistic nature of models in that time frame....which isn't easy for everyone because they are looking at deterministic solutions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JB says Tip had better lay low

BigJoeBastardi Joe Bastardi

Battle line .. snow ice and rain, very close to NYC with southern New england prob all snow. Major trough buckles into O valley nxt wknd

»

atmospheric_avenger_normal.png

BigJoeBastardi Joe Bastardi

Map for Leap Storm in the plains, March in like a Lion for the northeast. MSP target city for heaviest in Plains http://pic.twitter.com/5lCyyFFu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JB says Tip had better lay low

BigJoeBastardi Joe Bastardi

Battle line .. snow ice and rain, very close to NYC with southern New england prob all snow. Major trough buckles into O valley nxt wknd

»

atmospheric_avenger_normal.png

BigJoeBastardi Joe Bastardi

Map for Leap Storm in the plains, March in like a Lion for the northeast. MSP target city for heaviest in Plains http://pic.twitter.com/5lCyyFFu

Ive been in Jb 3-6 shade 3 times this winter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS has really been struggling lately. It had the suppressed storm over a week ago

cutting through our area. This week it tried to blast the warm front through on Friday.

That model needs a major tune up.

Well respected posters from other threads commenting on how bad the GFS is/has been this winter..yet many here use it, forecast from it and think it is worthwhile to look at

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JB says Tip had better lay low

BigJoeBastardi Joe Bastardi

Battle line .. snow ice and rain, very close to NYC with southern New england prob all snow. Major trough buckles into O valley nxt wknd

»

atmospheric_avenger_normal.png

BigJoeBastardi Joe Bastardi

Map for Leap Storm in the plains, March in like a Lion for the northeast. MSP target city for heaviest in Plains http://pic.twitter.com/5lCyyFFu

That's going to be an interesting trick considering there is 0, nadda, no teleconnector support for that.

The NAO is positive, and the PNA is negative - if there is a trough in the OV it will be transient, severed from the flow, and complete coincidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...