Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

February 28-29 Winter Storm


Hoosier

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 506
  • Created
  • Last Reply

lol @ your hysterics. All this trend to the north does is preclude us from getting any snow from the upper low on Thursday (it stays to the north). There is zero chance the pcpn on Wednesday is plain rain. The GFS verbatim is snow > pellets > dryslot with temp rising to +1 or +2C.

And I still think there's time for this to wiggle back south a bit.

You're right and we've come a long way from just a few days ago when EC was calling for a high in the low 50s on Wednesday. What a joke that was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right and we've come a long way from just a few days ago when EC was calling for a high in the low 50s on Wednesday. What a joke that was.

That was pure hype. EC and TWN can be laughable sometimes but when you base your long range forecasts on sites like Myforecast, your better off asking a monkey for the forecast, haha.

Also temps are marginal and a slight shift can make a huge difference in terms of precip type. Like Canuck said, its around 0 to 3C and a slight shift would make that range between -1C and 2C. Lets see. Still 48+ hours out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reviewing all available model guidance, my first guess for Toronto is 1-3".

Yeah, I'd say it could go as low as 1" if we get into PL sooner than anticipated. Regardless though, this isn't looking like a headline criteria event:

gfs_namer_054_precip_p48.gif

One max associated with the triple point. One with the decaying primary low. And us stuck in the middle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3/4/1985 looking like a nice analog on CIPS - jet structure is a little bit different but 850MB and 500MB charts are looking very similar to 12z run of GFS. However, the temp profiles were more favorable further to the south in 1985.

post-726-0-21253700-1330381568.png

post-726-0-04637600-1330381573.png

post-726-0-42261900-1330381580.png

Model temps from 12z GFS

post-726-0-42841500-1330381642.png

Toronto saw close to 10" of snow on march 4, 1985

http://www.climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/climateData/dailydata_e.html?timeframe=2&Prov=ONT&StationID=5097&dlyRange=1937-11-01|2012-02-25&Year=1985&Month=3&Day=01

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Toronto saw close to 10" of snow on march 4, 1985

http://www.climate.w...&Month=3&Day=01

Hmm...wow the temp profiles look almost exactly the same with this storm, maybe slightly cooler.

If this were to move slower and further south a repeat of that storm is possible but I dont see us getting anything over 6" at this point lol.

I think the March 07 storm is a better analogue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm...wow the temp profiles look almost exactly the same with this storm, maybe slightly cooler.

If this were to move slower and further south a repeat of that storm is possible but I dont see us getting anything over 6" at this point lol.

I think the March 07 storm is a better analogue.

The difference between this storm and some of the decent CAD induced snow/ice storms of the past like Jan 2/99 or Feb 8/01 was that in those cases the primary storm began occluding much later, allowing a WCB plume of gulf moisture to advect right into the lower lakes. This time around, it looks fairly likely that the best moisture is going to get shunted off to our SE along the theta-e ridge/triple point.

200/300mb jet is basically running ENE across the OV rather than NNE towards the lakes. NARR on the PSU page doesn't have H2 or 3 plots, but I'd guess in Jan 99 or Feb 01 or even March 07 the upper level jet orientation was more meridional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference between this storm and some of the decent CAD induced snow/ice storms of the past like Jan 2/99 or Feb 8/01 was that in those cases the primary storm began occluding much later, allowing a WCB plume of gulf moisture to advect right into the lower lakes. This time around, it looks fairly likely that the best moisture is going to get shunted off to our SE along the theta-e ridge/triple point.

200/300mb jet is basically running ENE across the OV rather than NNE towards the lakes. NARR on the PSU page doesn't have H2 or 3 plots, but I'd guess in Jan 99 or Feb 01 or even March 07 the upper level jet orientation was more meridional.

I'm guessing you're no longer optimistic about us getting 2-4"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm...wow the temp profiles look almost exactly the same with this storm, maybe slightly cooler.

If this were to move slower and further south a repeat of that storm is possible but I dont see us getting anything over 6" at this point lol.

I think the March 07 storm is a better analogue.

It looks similar on a weather map to the 1985 storm, but i can't see us getting moderate snow and a temperature of 19F on Wednesday. We're more likely to start off as wet snow with a temperature around 32-33F, then turn to rain. Just my gut feeling. The trend is not our friend with this storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm...wow the temp profiles look almost exactly the same with this storm, maybe slightly cooler.

If this were to move slower and further south a repeat of that storm is possible but I dont see us getting anything over 6" at this point lol.

I think the March 07 storm is a better analogue.

I have to admit though that the storm is incredibly similar looking. i mean it was 6C two days before that storm in Toronto, with bare ground. Also, Windsor and London saw more rain and freezing rain than Toronto. 7cm for Windsor, 11cm for london, 24cm for Toronto, 30cm for kingston, 36cm for Montreal.

If only....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to admit though that the storm is incredibly similar looking. i mean it was 6C two days before that storm in Toronto, with bare ground. Also, Windsor and London saw more rain and freezing rain than Toronto. 7cm for Windsor, 11cm for london, 24cm for Toronto, 30cm for kingston, 36cm for Montreal.

If only....

Ya that ain't going to happen in this garbage winter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...