CoastalWx Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 I'm glad Logan11 might do OK. I was worried about him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropopause_Fold Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 the srefs have ~100% prob for >.25" in 6hrs ending 15z over a good chunk of MA and CT. and even modest probs for .5" don't know...have a tough time thinking they are *that* wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N. OF PIKE Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 not ONE of the GFS Ens. members gives the Mass 128 loop more than 3 inches of snow (on their clown maps) out to 42 hours and i can't find any that give wachusett more than 4-5 inches either Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherMA Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 GYX snowfall map...not on board for snow on the NH coast so I guess they think a warmer solution plays out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 lol 90%+ 1" sref probs here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 the srefs have ~100% prob for >.25" in 6hrs ending 15z over a good chunk of MA and CT. and even modest probs for .5" don't know...have a tough time thinking they are *that* wrong. Yeah within 18 hours that seems like a lock at this point getting 1/4" QPF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherMA Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 the srefs have ~100% prob for >.25" in 6hrs ending 15z over a good chunk of MA and CT. and even modest probs for .5" don't know...have a tough time thinking they are *that* wrong. Of 22 sref members, 19 give ORH between 2 and 3.5". Two give less then 1" and one gives 6"+. Pretty good consensus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N. OF PIKE Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 It just hasn't been below 32 for over 48 hours here - which is extremely uncharacteristic for this time of the year. But hopefully you are correct. yup with good rates this rule has been proven to be garbage upteen times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 not ONE of the GFS Ens. members gives the Mass 128 loop more than 3 inches of snow (on their clown maps) out to 42 hours and i can't find any that give wachusett more than 4-5 inches either Were you expecting more? GFS is not crazy like the NAM...and ensembles were in fairly good agreement. Its basically a 2-4" event...maybe hedge a bit lower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 If you look at the NAM and HRRR...it has the classic SWFE look to the precip shield. What I mean is that big blob of QPF that moves in from the WSW. It's fed by a strong LLJ in which you can see on simulated radar products, as almost convective looking cells moving across se PA and NJ. It then narrows out, but extends way west into KORD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Ryan gets more snow than Kevin on the NAM clown map, lol. What are you forecasting in CT? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N. OF PIKE Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Were you expecting more? GFS is not crazy like the NAM...and ensembles were in fairly good agreement. Its basically a 2-4" event...maybe hedge a bit lower. no not at all point out current evidence as to why the nam clown maps are garbage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 the srefs have ~100% prob for >.25" in 6hrs ending 15z over a good chunk of MA and CT. and even modest probs for .5" don't know...have a tough time thinking they are *that* wrong. In 3 runs they went from 85% to 5% here. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Who knew the GEFS had clown maps??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattb65 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 If you look at the NAM and HRRR...it has the classic SWFE look to the precip shield. What I mean is that big blob of QPF that moves in from the WSW. It's fed by a strong LLJ in which you can see on simulated radar products, as almost convective looking cells moving across se PA and NJ. It then narrows out, but extends way west into KORD. I was just about to post the same thing regarding the HRRR - here's what it looks like at the end of the most recent run. I know this is kinda to post the HRRR at the end of it's range but it definitely shows a solid wall of fairly heavy snow to move through and quickly drop a couple inches of snow on the region Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 BTV's map for the North Country... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxmanmitch Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 18Z NAM looks like a 5-6" paste job for this area tomorrow morning followed by a period of mixed light rain, drizzle, and sleet. There could be some minor glazing in pockets on the east slope, but with the sun angle the way it is, it'll be minimal if there's any at all. If secondary blows up like the NAM has it, we start as heavy rain and sleet before ending a brief burst of heavy snow, which could bring some additional accumulation. How much more depends on how quickly we'd flip back to snow, assuming the secondary bombs as depicted. I'd rather be 50-100 miles north to cash in on the secondary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 What are you forecasting in CT? Probably nothing....you told me it wouldn't snow south of the MA/NH border. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherMA Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 LOL, HRRR ftw. Close to warning criteria thump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 That HRRR run has like 1-2" per hour moving into CT in the early morning hours...pretty impressive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Deduct 30% NAM QPF output on principle and then deduct another 30% because it's been huffing glue this season. I will keep my 3-5" forecast for the greater Limington metroplex. Optimistically went 4-6" here in the Dirty Lew.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropopause_Fold Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 it's staggering the difference between the ec and the nam s of LI. where the NAM has about 35 to 45 knots of SSE inflow the euro has about 10 knots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Probably nothing....you told me it wouldn't snow south of the MA/NH border. Besides, how can it snow when it's going to be 50 everywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Does anyone have the NOAA snowfall map for NH? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 Probably nothing....you told me it wouldn't snow south of the MA/NH border. This has been a rough winter for Kevin including mental breakdowns and large forecasting busts. Tough. I have 1-3" for mby points north. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 it's staggering the difference between the ec and the nam s of LI. where the NAM has about 35 to 45 knots of SSE inflow the euro has about 10 knots. I didn't look at 850 winds, but is that what it had? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 NAM is on big league whitney houston grade crack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 LOL, HRRR ftw. Close to warning criteria thump. Probably not warning...lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisM Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 I'll be driving right past Tolland mid day tomorrow. Wanna grab a beeyah? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N. OF PIKE Posted February 23, 2012 Share Posted February 23, 2012 i think at this point it looks pretty solid for W SNE getting 1-3 inches perhaps a 4 spot. E SNE i'm not sold on outside of ORH (which is really central) was the omega greater in CT then Eastern SNE for euro? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.