Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

2/29 - 3/1


NEG NAO

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 883
  • Created
  • Last Reply

If the Euro gets schooled by the GFS once again, I am never going to take the Euro seriously.

That's not really fair. The EC is generally better, but not by THAT much, so just because the EC shows something doesn't mean its definitely right. It just means, that on average, its a *bit* more likely to be right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not really fair. The EC is generally better, but not by THAT much, so just because the EC shows something doesn't mean its definitely right. It just means, that on average, its a *bit* more likely to be right.

I know the Euro is better than the GFS. For some reason, the GFS has been better this winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I continue to have the idea that this is maybe a brief mix to rain for NYC metro, and mostly snow probably well northeast, like Danbury on NE. The high looks too weak to really drive cold air in and keep it there, and the position/track of the low looks unfavorable still. Besides, with a too strong high and confluence, we risk the precip drying out until the warm air arrives. The secondary also looks like it'll pop too far N, despite any recent swings/trends. I'd much, much rather be around Boston for this than here. Again, typical Nina gradient pattern/storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not really fair. The EC is generally better, but not by THAT much, so just because the EC shows something doesn't mean its definitely right. It just means, that on average, its a *bit* more likely to be right.

Agree. Also, the GFS solution made more sense given the terrible pattern, and sure enough the Euro has basically caved. This is not a good snow set-up for the NYC metro (immediate) area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree. Also, the GFS solution made more sense given the terrible pattern, and sure enough the Euro has basically caved. This is not a good snow set-up for the NYC metro (immediate) area.

It was 1 model run. Lets wait for today's guidance to see if it "caved" or not. I wouldnt even forecast anything until tomorrow's model guidance.

But I agree, that the pattern supports rain over snow for the coast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Decent CAD on the nam.

It's still almost all rain for the city and coast, and eventually goes to rain all the way through CT, although they likely get a better front end snow event. You don't have a real prolonged snow event until you're up to I-90. That's looking like a good area for heavier snow accums right now. Again, typical of this pattern and Ninas in general. Classic N-S gradient storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By my eye it looks like the 12z NAM gives between .2 and .4 inches frozen liquid equivalent across the northern half of NYC metro with the initial overrunning.

Further south and east of, say, the bronx, it appears boundary layer temps support mainly rain.

The 2nd round of organized precip is still up in the air. This NAM run looks good for C and SNE, but previous runs and ensembles occasionally targeted SENY, NEPA, and CT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NYC:

NAM is frozen through hour 57 right up to the 975 level.

The only non frozen layer, which is very shallow, is the surface level which is 36 degrees.

NAM is even a slop/slush type storm for NYC up until hour 58-59, with .45" of total precip through hour 60.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...