Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

February 19-20 Potential Bomb Part II


earthlight

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 863
  • Created
  • Last Reply

FWIW the NAM initialized the Low much weaker than what OBS are showing.

It's probably going to be a miss, because it is almost impossible for there to be a significant change in the height field and the timing of the shortwaves, because we are starting to approach the models' deadly range.

The strength of the low in Mexico will not make a difference in regards to the track. We need to see more northern energy interaction. We'll see what happens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This definitely isn't a good NAM run for y'all.

The NAM hasn't shown anything good for us prior to this run. This run doesn't hurt us; rather it's the status quo - no snow. The people that will be hurting are the people in the Mid Atlantic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice snow squall signature tomorrow night on the nam. Would be funny if we got more snow than DC from that.

Almost every potential we had so far this winter keeps getting messed up... even tomorrow night's light precipitation potential. 850mb temps are below freezing but the boundary layer is very marginal, with the 18z NAM/GFS showing temperatures still near 40 degrees, and with barely light QPF falling, IMO it would be rain in the city and a possible mix or light snow further inland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you really expect it to be??

The NAM hasn't shown anything good for us prior to this run. This run doesn't hurt us; rather it's the status quo - no snow. The people that will be hurting are the people in the Mid Atlantic.

That's not entirely true, previous NAM runs have pushed QPF up to NYC. I don't think this run will, however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not entirely true, previous NAM runs have pushed QPF up to NYC. I don't think this run will, however.

Places like central Jersey ala Martin land had the best shot in our general region. Looks like they've been taken out of the game along with everyone to the south of them. Pretty brutal run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rule: When you're in a bad pattern in a bad winter, anything that can go wrong for getting a significant snowfall, will go wrong.

It's simple but true. There were just so many ways that this storm (as a winter storm) was NOT going to happen. And on the other hand, for this storm to happen here, everything had to fall into place perfectly. Now, what were the chances of that happening?

WX/PT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rule: When you're in a bad pattern in a bad winter, anything that can go wrong for getting a significant snowfall, will go wrong.

It's simple but true. There were just so many ways that this storm (as a winter storm) was NOT going to happen. And on the other hand, for this storm to happen here, everything had to fall into place perfectly. Now, what were the chances of that happening?

WX/PT

Like in a good winter it snows out of every chance....in a bad one it just finds a way to let us down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like in a good winter it snows out of every chance....in a bad one it just finds a way to let us down

Looking at the last 20 years or so, the standard deviation from the mean in terms of snowfall in NYC metro seems to have increased dramatically, especially in the good snow years. (I'm looking at a graph and not the actual data or I'd have gotten the actual numbers.) In short, when we're below the mean, it's usually way below. When we've been above the mean, we're almost always way above. It's been feast or famine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the last 20 years or so, the standard deviation from the mean in terms of snowfall in NYC metro seems to have increased dramatically, especially in the good snow years. (I'm looking at a graph and not the actual data or I'd have gotten the actual numbers.) In short, when we're below the mean, it's usually way below. When we've been above the mean, we're almost always way above. It's been feast or famine.

Its crazy how many extremes there have been. We've had 1988-89, 1996-97, 1997-98, and 2001-2002 all in the top 10 least snowiest....1994-95 and 1992-93 came within a heartbeat of also being in the top 10 as did 1998-1999, 2 were saved in mid-March and the other by a big mid-winter storm. Then you've got 1993-94, 1995-96, 2009-2010, and 2010-2011 on the opposite end of the spectrum. In reality I think its a product of the unsuaully warm conditions globally for most of those winters likely resulting in exceptional moisture and chances for big snow during the colder winters and during the warmer ones....nada...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...