Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

February 19-20 Potential Bomb Part II


earthlight

Recommended Posts

As we all await tonight's 00z suite, we've been given a tremendous array of solutions over the past 24 hrs. It's going to be an interesting few days.

As usual please keep the banter to a minimum. If you are going to say something about the models, use some reasoning.

It starts with the SREFs momentarily. Good luck, and wishing you all feet of wind driven snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 863
  • Created
  • Last Reply

As we all await tonight's 00z suite, we've been given a tremendous array of solutions over the past 24 hrs. It's going to be an interesting few days.

As usual please keep the banter to a minimum. If you are going to say something about the models, use some reasoning.

It starts with the SREFs momentarily. Good luck, and wishing you all feet of wind driven snow.

Havent heard this In a while lets go!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 87 hour SLP on the SREFs is over Cape Hatteras, it appears based on the trajectory from 81-87 it would pass just south of the benchmark

the good news is its more gfs like in regards to a cleaner phase of the different streams and not the disfunctional look the 18z nam had of the cutoff getting held back.

Members leaning more north as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 87 hour SLP on the SREFs is over Cape Hatteras, it appears based on the trajectory from 81-87 it would pass just south of the benchmark

Thats what I like to hear. On a side note, what is it with presidents day weekend? Correct me if I'm wrong, but we're usually tracking some sort of storm for presidents day every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very ugly. That disturbance off the PNW is pretty crucial- the 18z was modeling that a bit stronger, thus enabling the ridge to pump ahead and the disturbance around Montana to dig.

The NAM height field looks fairly similar to the 18z GFS.

For reference, the NAM has a shortwave and trough axis over Eastern Montana valid 12z Friday. The GFS had it in a very similar spot -- almost identical. The 12z Euro valid at the same time had this trough axis over Western Iowa...hundreds of miles faster and south/east.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NAM height field looks fairly similar to the 18z GFS.

For reference, the NAM has a shortwave and trough axis over Eastern Montana valid 12z Friday. The GFS had it in a very similar spot -- almost identical. The 12z Euro valid at the same time had this trough axis over Western Iowa...hundreds of miles faster and south/east.

Hopefully we can get some northern stream interaction with the southern vort, but hopefully it will occur a little later than the GFS, so we don't get a super amped up inland solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NAM height field looks fairly similar to the 18z GFS.

For reference, the NAM has a shortwave and trough axis over Eastern Montana valid 12z Friday. The GFS had it in a very similar spot -- almost identical. The 12z Euro valid at the same time had this trough axis over Western Iowa...hundreds of miles faster and south/east.

Yea, but that energy from MT has consistently phased in before the SW was ejected- to some extent on the GFS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, but that energy from MT has consistently phased in before the SW was ejected- to some extent on the GFS

The 00z NAM looks like a little less northern stream interaction than what the 18z GFS depicted, which is good, considering the GFS had a phased inland solution, and if we can get a later phase, then we have a better chance at getting more snow than rain out of this storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without having to extrapolate any of the shorter term models, we should at least get some clues tonight as to where they may lean, as a lot of the players on the field are important very early on.

Apparently this was awful analysis, considering how different the NAM looked at 24 vs where it ended up after 36 hours. Is it just a timing thing out west with that energy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NAM looks like it's going to just barely miss the phase here...but oddly enough it looked similar to the 18z GFS with the northern stream. It is slower in ejecting the southern stream vort and the height field over the Eastern 1/3 of the US is significantly less amplified.

The slower ejection of the sw is the biggest difference. Holding that energy back always the northern features to swing through with no interaction missing the phase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...