NCSNOW Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 That map from DT says alot about MBY situation. Can't count the repeating times we go through this here. Literally would get 2+ inches if this verifies. However no more than a 30-40 mile swing North or South, I would get zilch or 7-8 inches. Got a full tank in the 4x4, so you can bet I'll see the white stuff one way or the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burgertime Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Did anyone post the 18z GEM? It has a good amount of precip still in NC @36 hours...hard to read but would be between .10 and .20 in MBY of QPF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rduwx Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 I think folks are being very conservative with the accumulation forecasts. I don't see how Wake and Durham counties could get just a trace to an inch when the models have all been trending for more and more as the day has gone alone. I think you're setting your self up for a disappointment. If for some reason we end up w/ more that would be great but I believe you have to go into this storm thinking maybe an inch. Of course there are the possibilities where we could end up w/ more. If the deformation band goes through our area is one possibility but it's hard to predict where that band is going to set up at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold Rain Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 These are the kinds of storms that will lull you into believing you have a chance at a nice surprise and have you watching ever shift of every model and in the end you get nothing. Be careful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burgertime Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 These are the kinds of storms that will lull you into believing you have a chance at a nice surprise and have you watching ever shift of every model and in the end you get nothing. Be careful. I've learned this hard lesson over the past two years. It almost never is a "surprise" in my favor almost always the opposite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strongwxnc Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 This is the why you should approach all storms! Good post... These are the kinds of storms that will lull you into believing you have a chance at a nice surprise and have you watching ever shift of every model and in the end you get nothing. Be careful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nchighcountrywx Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Even in the mountains, we have the concern with this one. @wxbrad: It could snow for hours & accumulations will be hard to come by with these soil temperatures. http://twitpic.com/8lp33r #snOMG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strongwxnc Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Posted on Andy Wood's Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/#!/awood11 "The warm ground temperature argument is drastically overplayed during the winter, especially when heavy precipitation and snowfall rates are likely. Heavy and consistent snow rates trump the entire "soil is too warm" argument. I have seen numerous times (in TN, MS, GA and SC) where 50-degree soil temperatures and (60-degree air the day before) was overcome in the first 30 minutes by consistent moderate-heavy snow. The key is a consistent rate of snow. If inconsistent and only moderate snow at times, warm ground temps will overwhelm snow rates. This is an intense, dynamic system capable of manufacture it's own cold air as precipitation rates dictate how much cold is pulled from the upper-levels." Even in the mountains, we have the concern with this one. @wxbrad: It could snow for hours & accumulations will be hard to come by with these soil temperatures. http://twitpic.com/8lp33r #snOMG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue_Ridge_Escarpment Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Posted on Andy Wood's Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/#!/awood11 "The warm ground temperature argument is drastically overplayed during the winter, especially when heavy precipitation and snowfall rates are likely. Heavy and consistent snow rates trump the entire "soil is too warm" argument. I have seen numerous times (in TN, MS, GA and SC) where 50-degree soil temperatures and (60-degree air the day before) was overcome in the first 30 minutes by consistent moderate-heavy snow. The key is a consistent rate of snow. If inconsistent and only moderate snow at times, warm ground temps will overwhelm snow rates. This is an intense, dynamic system capable of manufacture it's own cold air as precipitation rates dictate how much cold is pulled from the upper-levels." Excellent write-up on this. Most important part is in bold. I've been a witness to 60 degree days as well and everyone saying, there's no way its going to snow and stick, but the next day several inches was on the grass and even the roads. All dependent on the rate of the snow! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valkhorn Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Posted on Andy Wood's Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/#!/awood11 "The warm ground temperature argument is drastically overplayed during the winter, especially when heavy precipitation and snowfall rates are likely. Heavy and consistent snow rates trump the entire "soil is too warm" argument. I have seen numerous times (in TN, MS, GA and SC) where 50-degree soil temperatures and (60-degree air the day before) was overcome in the first 30 minutes by consistent moderate-heavy snow. The key is a consistent rate of snow. If inconsistent and only moderate snow at times, warm ground temps will overwhelm snow rates. This is an intense, dynamic system capable of manufacture it's own cold air as precipitation rates dictate how much cold is pulled from the upper-levels." I wonder what the soil temps were before March 1993 or April 1987. They couldn't have been cold. I also remember growing up in MS when in Feb. 1996 (after a warm spell) we got an ice/snow storm and frigid temps and in spite of what I thought were warm soil temps everything that fell stuck around all weekend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Met1985 Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Posted on Andy Wood's Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/#!/awood11 "The warm ground temperature argument is drastically overplayed during the winter, especially when heavy precipitation and snowfall rates are likely. Heavy and consistent snow rates trump the entire "soil is too warm" argument. I have seen numerous times (in TN, MS, GA and SC) where 50-degree soil temperatures and (60-degree air the day before) was overcome in the first 30 minutes by consistent moderate-heavy snow. The key is a consistent rate of snow. If inconsistent and only moderate snow at times, warm ground temps will overwhelm snow rates. This is an intense, dynamic system capable of manufacture it's own cold air as precipitation rates dictate how much cold is pulled from the upper-levels." Great write up. I have see it in the 70s one day and 3-4 inches of snow the next day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poimen Posted February 19, 2012 Author Share Posted February 19, 2012 not to belabor the point about soil temps, but I wonder what the soil temps were in PA on the eve of the Hallowwen storm this past October? Fact is if it snows hard enough and long enough snow will stick to grassy surfaces just fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superjames1992 Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 These are the kinds of storms that will lull you into believing you have a chance at a nice surprise and have you watching ever shift of every model and in the end you get nothing. Be careful. You got that right! I'm not really expecting anything more than an inch here. I think more may fall, but not accumulate. I realize the potential for a surprise and love when the Euro and NAM dump 4-6" on my area, but I don't believe it's realistic to expect that to actually happen. Posted on Andy Wood's Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/#!/awood11 "The warm ground temperature argument is drastically overplayed during the winter, especially when heavy precipitation and snowfall rates are likely. Heavy and consistent snow rates trump the entire "soil is too warm" argument. I have seen numerous times (in TN, MS, GA and SC) where 50-degree soil temperatures and (60-degree air the day before) was overcome in the first 30 minutes by consistent moderate-heavy snow. The key is a consistent rate of snow. If inconsistent and only moderate snow at times, warm ground temps will overwhelm snow rates. This is an intense, dynamic system capable of manufacture it's own cold air as precipitation rates dictate how much cold is pulled from the upper-levels." not to belabor the point about soil temps, but I wonder what the soil temps were in PA on the eve of the Hallowwen storm this past October? Fact is if it snows hard enough and long enough snow will stick to grassy surfaces just fine. Right. However, I am not sure how heavy or how consistently the snow will fall during this one. If the snow is light and/or comes in squalls with just light snow/flurries in between, we will have a hard time coming by many accumulations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jburns Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Last call from DT. Looks good! I'm surprised no one else has commented on this so maybe I'm the one seeing it wrong but isn't this map a bit screwed up? On the map he has 2-4" over the NC piedmont and across the VA tidewater in green but in the legend he has green equaling 1-2". Also the tan over far north central NC an through VA above the green he has 1-2" but the legend talks about longer duration snow than the 2-4" inch area. EDIT: OK after looking further I see the thin lines separating the amounts but still find it strange seeing 8-12" over a color that is described as much less in the legend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isopycnic Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 I'm surprised no one else has commented on this so maybe I'm the one seeing it wrong but isn't this map a bit screwed up? On the map he has 2-4" over the NC piedmont and across the VA tidewater in green but in the legend he has green equaling 1-2". Also the tan over far north central NC an through VA above the green he has 1-2" but the legend talks about longer duration snow than the 2-4" inch area. EDIT: OK after looking further I see the thin lines separating the amounts but still find it strange seeing 8-12" over a color that is described as much less in the legend. Wxrisk.com DONT FORGET THE DONATE BUTTON... on the LEFT side of the page UNDER the WXRISK.com LOGO... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superjames1992 Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 I'm surprised no one else has commented on this so maybe I'm the one seeing it wrong but isn't this map a bit screwed up? On the map he has 2-4" over the NC piedmont and across the VA tidewater in green but in the legend he has green equaling 1-2". Also the tan over far north central NC an through VA above the green he has 1-2" but the legend talks about longer duration snow than the 2-4" inch area. EDIT: OK after looking further I see the thin lines separating the amounts but still find it strange seeing 8-12" over a color that is described as much less in the legend. I think DT's totals are too high, in general. Also, I don't think there will be quite as dramatic of a difference between what Raleigh and the Triad sees. It looks like he's only calling for ~2" in Asheville, too, which seems kind of low, to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
POWERSTROKE Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 as long as we get moisture we will get ice tomorrow night which will work for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Local Yokel Wx Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 I think DT's totals are too high, in general. Also, I don't think there will be quite as dramatic of a difference between what Raleigh and the Triad sees. It looks like he's only calling for ~2" in Asheville, too, which seems kind of low, to me. I dont see Asheville getting 2", maybe a slushy inch downtown with the higher elevations raking in as they are closer to the bulk of the precip. Here in SW NC (Cullowhee) we are on the southern extent of the precip, so we're just rooting for a solid dusting. But I would love to be told im wrong, so any opinion to my thinking is welcomed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burgertime Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Well NAM is rolling right away the southern energy is a tad slower and a bit south. That northern energy looks sharper so we'll see where this run goes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rduwx Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 The energy dropping down from the northern stream looks strong this run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burgertime Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 This run is colder @12 compared to 18z..00z has 850's going into the mountains of NC on the 18z it was in Northern VA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wow Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 colder, but weaker SLP, less precip due to slower phasing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burgertime Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 The energy dropping down from the northern stream looks strong this run. One thing I'm worried about is if it phases....it doesn't look to phase till late still not sure if we want it to phase early or late though so maybe that's a good thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poimen Posted February 19, 2012 Author Share Posted February 19, 2012 NAM much slower and weaker with the LP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burgertime Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 colder, but weaker SLP, less precip due to slower phasing. That's what I was worried about, we want this to phase earlier to get more precip correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SBUWX23 Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 weaker slp would mean less WA and less of a warm nose with this being further south and RDU profiles have no warm nose at 21z. in fact its isothermal near 0C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rduwx Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Looks like we have the beginning of a phase at hr 21...Heavy precip in all of NC but 850's aren't there yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burgertime Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 weaker slp would mean less WA and less of a warm nose with this being further south and RDU profiles have no warm nose at 21z. in fact its isothermal near 0C BOOM @24! This is going to be good for someone in Central NC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rduwx Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 hr 24 looking good...850's are good and heavy precip. Thanks SBU for the clarification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poimen Posted February 19, 2012 Author Share Posted February 19, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.