Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Feb. 18-20, 2012 Disco/Analysis


Poimen

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

From RAH for rockingham. Nc/Sc border

Sunday Night: Rain likely, possibly mixing with snow after 11pm, then gradually ending. Cloudy, with a low around 31. North wind between 13 and 17 mph, with gusts as high as 28 mph. Chance of precipitation is 60%. New precipitation amounts of less than a tenth of an inch possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, no real special meaning. It would have sucked if this were a major cad storm and we were relying on that for some ice or something, but in this storm i'm not sure it matters. the main thing is this initial SLP is not going to matter a whole lot. there is going to be a quick jump to the SC coast. the latest WV loop is showing more interactiong b/n the southern vort and northern vort on the backside than the models are depicting. this deformation zone is going to hammer someone.

Agreed. Most of the high-res models are suggsting a longer duration of precipitation (from 03z to after 09z) with the upper level energy, and I'm starting to think somewhere in central NC could see accumulating snow from that deformation band.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok guys my afternoon update. Sorry i havent been on more today, but saturday is family day. I will be on and off the rest of the day. Thanks again for reading.

http://www.examiner....t-the-southeast

For whatever reason, the last post was taken down. I'm not trying to be disrespectful. However, after looking at the afternoon model runs I'm just curious to why the snow forecast for TN (all of it) is so low. Are you thinking there are convective feedback issues or is the tap from the GOM going to cut precip rates in the TN Valley. I've thought that myself after reading Hickory's comments. Just want some insight. The warm nose in the TN Valley can always be a problem - I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding convection, if the orientation of it remains positively tilted enough, that is when it can enhance downstream QPF. When it races ahead more toward negative tilt, QPF is hindered.

In this case though, I don't think it really matters one way or the other. The Gulf convection would likely only rob from the initial rain and likely wouldn't have a ton to do with the dynamic lifting with our secondary disturbance late tomorrow/ tomorrow night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For whatever reason, the last post was taken down. I'm not trying to be disrespectful. However, after looking at the afternoon model runs I'm just curious to why the snow forecast for TN (all of it) is so low. Are you thinking there are convective feedback issues or is the tap from the GOM going to cut precip rates in the TN Valley. I've thought that myself after reading Hickory's comments. Just want some insight. The warm nose in the TN Valley can always be a problem - I agree.

No disrespect taken. I could be underdone in TN, especially NE TN. To me I am worried that by the time the cold air comes in the best dynamics will be leaving the area leaving only a brief window for now. I could certainly see more of a 1-3 in those areas of TN where I have dusting to 1inch and locally more around the Tri-Cities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People keep saying this, but I have my doubts as to whether it's actually true. The Euro is a powerful model.

This is a common misconception. The reason why the Euro got this wrap, was because back in the day all we had from the Euro was output every 24 hours. The NWS rarely used it because they had very limited output to see from it. Thus they used the Eta ( now nam), AVN (now gfs), etc.

The Euro has very good resolution even at short ranges and this model is just as good in the short range as it is in the medium range. Think about it logically. A weather model uses prognostic dynamic equations to predict the state of the atmospherein the future. If you had bad data/results in the early part of this, how would it magically correct itself and get better in the medium range?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No disrespect taken. I could be underdone in TN, especially NE TN. To me I am worried that by the time the cold air comes in the best dynamics will be leaving the area leaving only a brief window for now. I could certainly see more of a 1-3 in those areas of TN where I have dusting to 1inch and locally more around the Tri-Cities.

Thanks again, Raleigh. I can definitely see that scenario as I have lived it many times. The RUC's most recent run would support your map as it actually dryslots the eastern TN Valley. The warm nose in the TN Valley is usually underdone by wx models and downsloping is always an issue. Great disco on your website - I always read it when you post the link.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GSP seems relatively unexcited. (of course, I'm reading this from the perspective of getting probably no more than a dusting)

SUNDAY...THE LOW PRESSURE CENTER IS PROGGED TO TRACK QUICKLY FROM

NRN GA TO THE SE NC COASTAL WATERS BY 00Z MONDAY AND DEEPEN TO

AROUND 1000 MB. IN THE UPPER LEVELS THE STRONGEST Q CONVERGENCE WILL

CROSS THE CWFA SUNDAY MORNING. THEN A DEFORMATION ZONE WILL BEGIN TO

PIVOT AND SHIFT EAST FROM ERN KY/TN TO THE NC MTNS BY EVENING. BOTH

THE NAM AND GFS FCST SNDGS SHOW PROFILES IN THE NRN MTNS CHANGING

FROM RA TO SN FROM LATE MORNING THRU THE AFTN HOURS. THE NAM TRIES

TO HOLD ONTO A WARM NOSE...BUT THIS SCENARIO SEEMS UNLIKELY WITHIN A

DEFORMATION ZONE. USING A TOP-DOWN APPROACH FAVORING THE GFS

PROFILES...RAIN CHANGES TO SNOW ACRS THE NRN NC MTNS AND ADJACENT

BLUE RIDGE STARTING AROUND 15Z...WITH SNOW LEVELS DROPPING THRU THE

DAY. MEANWHILE...A DRY SLOT WILL PUNCH INTO THE SRN HALF OF THE

CWFA...SO POPS SHUD TAPER OFF. (ALTHOUGH DRIZZLE MAY LINGER THRU THE

DAY.) AS FOR ACCUM...TAKING A BLEND OF GUIDANCE AND USING HPC/S

SLR...THE CURRENT WATCH ZONES DO REACH 12-HR WARNING CRITERIA.

OUTSIDE OF THOSE AREAS...IT IS HIGHLY ELEVATION-DEPENDENT...WITH THE

SW NC MTNS GETTING ONLY ADVISORY-LEVEL SNOW ABOVE ABOUT 5000 FT.

ALSO...THE I-40 CORRIDOR MAY GET SOME SNOW ACCUM AS THE LOW EXITS

LATE SUN AFTN/EVE. CONFIDENCE SEEMS HIGH ENUF TO UPGRADE THE WATCH

TO A WINTER STORM WARNING...BUT NO HIGH ENUF TO ISSUE ANYTHING

OUTSIDE THAT AREA. WILL MENTION POTENTIAL IMPACTS FOR THE REST OF

THE MTNS IN THE HWO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh...GSP changed things up for my zone forecast. Now showing predominately rain with a SLIGHT chance of some backside flurries. They (GSP) are pretty spot on, so I guess I can keep my fingers crossed that they are wrong. We are all human eh?? LMAO! :)

EDIT: it looks like the NAM is showing a colder look for the NC Piedmont on the 18z run. I have not looked at soundings, but it looks like more of a chance for prolonged Wintry weather??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...