Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,584
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

2012 Winter Banter Thread #3


yoda

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Bob, there are some excellent winters in this list, so I'm not so sure why you're not enthused.

But from what I know (which isn't a whole lot), we want a west based Nino if we want a lot of cold and snow.

Totally agree with there being some good ones on the list. The better fitting analogs were not the good ones. It's all speculation anyway. I'm just having some fun here more than anything. You guys are used to me by now. I'm a #'s guy and all of my lr analysis is strictly #'s driven moreso than anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some grades (feb 19 edition)...

DT: Too high, then too low. Average the maps and you're pretty good. C+

JB: Ugly map, not even close in most spots. F+

JBerk: After polling Facebook members... A- (better luck next time but you kept us interested)

CWG: People are getting tired of you being right all the time. But you missed on RIC. B

Tony Pann: Models wrong, you wrong, everyone wrong. But you're not as big a name as JB. D

LC: Did you issue a forecast? I never looked. C

McGuirk: You thought it would snow in RIC. B+

Leesburg 04: Hows that 3" my friend? Incomplete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some grades (feb 19 edition)...

DT: Too high, then too low. Average the maps and you're pretty good. C+

JB: Ugly map, not even close in most spots. F+

JBerk: After polling Facebook members... A- (better luck next time but you kept us interested)

CWG: People are getting tired of you being right all the time. But you missed on RIC. B

Tony Pann: Models wrong, you wrong, everyone wrong. But you're not as big a name as JB. D

LC: Did you issue a forecast? I never looked. C

McGuirk: You thought it would snow in RIC. B+

Leesburg 04: Hows that 3" my friend? Incomplete.

Adam: A+ (other than his ROA forecast, but he still gets an A+ in my book)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some grades (feb 19 edition)...

DT: Too high, then too low. Average the maps and you're pretty good. C+

JB: Ugly map, not even close in most spots. F+

JBerk: After polling Facebook members... A- (better luck next time but you kept us interested)

CWG: People are getting tired of you being right all the time. But you missed on RIC. B

Tony Pann: Models wrong, you wrong, everyone wrong. But you're not as big a name as JB. D

LC: Did you issue a forecast? I never looked. C

McGuirk: You thought it would snow in RIC. B+

Leesburg 04: Hows that 3" my friend? Incomplete.

Where's H2O? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some grades (feb 19 edition)...

DT: Too high, then too low. Average the maps and you're pretty good. C+

JB: Ugly map, not even close in most spots. F+

JBerk: After polling Facebook members... A- (better luck next time but you kept us interested)

CWG: People are getting tired of you being right all the time. But you missed on RIC. B

Tony Pann: Models wrong, you wrong, everyone wrong. But you're not as big a name as JB. D

LC: Did you issue a forecast? I never looked. C

McGuirk: You thought it would snow in RIC. B+

Leesburg 04: Hows that 3" my friend? Incomplete.

We don't forecast for Richmond and put no effort into the map down that way. CWG actually got a couple people claiming we hyped the event on oen of Jason's posts after he pretty much said we'd see less than inch and maybe nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't forecast for Richmond and put no effort into the map down that way. CWG actually got a couple people claiming we hyped the event on oen of Jason's posts after he pretty much said we'd see less than inch and maybe nothing.

Maybe we should put a circle on the map with dragons outside it so people know RIC doesn't matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ill give you an A. DCA got a T, not quite the "1-2 lock" you forecasted, but wasn't a complete shutout :P

I should not have mini caved 48 hrs out. I was not excpecting the body of the storm to come north but thought we could eke out a slight shift in the final bit. Unfortunately I still am kinda weenie when I think it might actually snow. It was pretty apparant by Sat that was going to be a problem...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should not have mini caved 48 hrs out. I was not excpecting the body of the storm to come north but thought we could eke out a slight shift in the final bit. Unfortunately I still am kinda weenie when I think it might actually snow. It was pretty apparant by Sat that was going to be a problem...

I am pretty sure 90% or so of the posters here all weenied out 48hrs prior, so don't feel too bad.

But at least you and Matt got to go chasing and see some good snow, so it wasn't a complete waste of a week!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am pretty sure 90% or so of the posters here all weenied out 48hrs prior, so don't feel too bad.

But at least you and Matt got to go chasing and see some good snow, so it wasn't a complete waste of a week!

yeah.. was a good time. better than i'd have thought. it's easier finding a large snow band than a tornado, that's for sure. now i just need to convince matt go come to the plains sometime. it was kinda sad leaving the snow and coming home tho heh. i bet it was gorgeous this morning.. my dog would not have been happy though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah.. was a good time. better than i'd have thought. it's easier finding a large snow band than a tornado, that's for sure. now i just need to convince matt go come to the plains sometime. it was kinda sad leaving the snow and coming home tho heh. i bet it was gorgeous this morning.. my dog would not have been happy though.

It was beautiful this morning. My broccoli and garlic were standing proud against the snow this morning.

post-127-0-70393900-1329763024.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some grades (feb 19 edition)...

DT: Too high, then too low. Average the maps and you're pretty good. C+

JB: Ugly map, not even close in most spots. F+

JBerk: After polling Facebook members... A- (better luck next time but you kept us interested)

CWG: People are getting tired of you being right all the time. But you missed on RIC. B

Tony Pann: Models wrong, you wrong, everyone wrong. But you're not as big a name as JB. D

LC: Did you issue a forecast? I never looked. C

McGuirk: You thought it would snow in RIC. B+

Leesburg 04: Hows that 3" my friend? Incomplete.

Lol....give me credit for never waffling at least....I will gladly refund money to anyone who donated to my trust fund

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some grades (feb 19 edition)...

DT: Too high, then too low. Average the maps and you're pretty good. C+

JB: Ugly map, not even close in most spots. F+

JBerk: After polling Facebook members... A- (better luck next time but you kept us interested)

CWG: People are getting tired of you being right all the time. But you missed on RIC. B

Tony Pann: Models wrong, you wrong, everyone wrong. But you're not as big a name as JB. D

LC: Did you issue a forecast? I never looked. C

McGuirk: You thought it would snow in RIC. B+

Leesburg 04: Hows that 3" my friend? Incomplete.

A- for Berk? really? I cant give him more than a C...we all know he explains things well and has a way of making his followers believe what he says no matter what it is, but the fact is he put a snow map out that busted horribly, you dont get a pass on that just because you said it had high bust probability. He hammered the north trend card WAY too hard. but otherwise I agree with the rest :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A- for Berk? really? I cant give him more than a C...we all know he explains things well and has a way of making his followers believe what he says no matter what it is, but the fact is he put a snow map out that busted horribly, you dont get a pass on that just because you said it had high bust probability. He hammered the north trend card WAY too hard. but otherwise I agree with the rest :P

Berk gave himself an A- following the weekend prior's Saturday snowfall... it was clearly a jab at him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol....give me credit for never waffling at least....I will gladly refund money to anyone who donated to my trust fund

Credit earned and it was a near miss at the very least. You never shot for the moon or waffled and that makes your forecast the minority with this storm.

I found a sure fire way to never bust on a snow forecast. I just don't make one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some grades (feb 19 edition)...

DT: Too high, then too low. Average the maps and you're pretty good. C+

JB: Ugly map, not even close in most spots. F+

JBerk: After polling Facebook members... A- (better luck next time but you kept us interested)

CWG: People are getting tired of you being right all the time. But you missed on RIC. B

Tony Pann: Models wrong, you wrong, everyone wrong. But you're not as big a name as JB. D

LC: Did you issue a forecast? I never looked. C

McGuirk: You thought it would snow in RIC. B+

Leesburg 04: Hows that 3" my friend? Incomplete.

H2O: A++++++++++ My map was funny and verified

Where's H2O? :P

Hi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

March 1st threat still showing up. lol

GFS showing rain but 850's and surface are close enough. Euro trying to show an east based -nao but not really. Only 10 days left to figure it out.

In all honesty, saying we have no chance at another "chance" at snow isn't wise just yet. March lions are rare nowadays but maybe....just maybe..... :weenie:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

March 1st threat still showing up. lol

GFS showing rain but 850's and surface are close enough. Euro trying to show an east based -nao but not really. Only 10 days left to figure it out.

In all honesty, saying we have no chance at another "chance" at snow isn't wise just yet. March lions are rare nowadays but maybe....just maybe..... :weenie:

I'm not tracking jack squat after last week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...