Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Pattern looks improved for possible KU event 2/18-2/25 time range


Mikehobbyst

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 676
  • Created
  • Last Reply

OK - I'll say what's on everyone's mind right now. This is exactly where we want it at this stage in the game, 5 days in advance. At the veyr least we can be thankful we're not tracking a storm that's progged to cut inland or through the Lakes, as that would have an extremely low chance of trending SE given it's a La Nina year. The fact that the SE ridge has been underforecast all winter is somewhat comforting given the current placement of the storm; additionally, I'd say a large chunk of our "good" ones, started off as NC/VA hits 4-5 days out in time.

This is a bone of hope on Valetine's Day.

Now the more negative side of things --

1) The lack of storng blocking does hurt our chances for significant nern/sern stream interaction and phasing. It can be done, but the less than stellar pattern in both oceans could very well lead to a less than stellar solution for us

2) The short wave hitting the west coast and deamplifying the ridge immediately to its east is obviously an important aspect in this forecast, and needs to be watched. I have hope that it can be sampled better since we're far out in time, but there's also a possibility that current modelling is correct in the idea of an out to sea storm.

So all in all - work needs to be done, but I have cautious optimism with this one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GGEM drives the Pacific energy so far south that it allows the ridge axis to build again near the Rockies.

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/CMC_12z/f120.gif

Having it become so meridional also helps to slow the flow down in general, thus the ridge axis is more amplified AND further west. I don't think that evolution is that far fetched. There is a decent jet streak off the PAC coast, but I wouldn't say it's a roaring one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

0.25" -- goes as far north as the Pennsylvania Maryland border.

That is from the ECM 12 Z means

Also the 12 Z means is SE of last nights 00z means...

Moderate precip gets up to NYC. It just barely gets up to there. Much further north than the op run but a little bit south of last night's mean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From not one flake north of Cape May to rain as far north as Atlantic City in one run. Nice!!

I don't want to derail the legitimacy of this thread by discussing one run of the DGEX verbatim, but it shows VERY heavy precipitation, and since 850 mb temperatures are cold enough, and surface temperatures and thicknesses are marginal there, I'm guessing it's probably snow in Atlantic City. Probably rain in Cape May though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Patrick

Somewhat troubling (as troubling as you can be from this far out on the DGEX, no less) is the tighter gradient on the north end of things...

:lol: :lol: :lol:

The DGEX gives our area a moderate to heavy snowstorm.

Wow is that a lot of snow. :weenie:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Through hour 81 of the 18z GFS, the northern stream is digging more than it was in 12z. Not sure if it will make a difference for the outcome of the storm yet or not.

I hate speculating before the model gets out into the timeframe but this is much more amped then 12z....at 93 low coming ashore just west or new orleans

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...