Kaner587 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 This 84 hr NAM stuff has to stop. We have no idea if the new and updated model has any of the same problems the older versions do. The model has had several significant upgrades and just because its the 84 Hr NAM does not mean its wrong. Upgrades or not the model isn't great at the edge of its scope. It doesn't take a met to see this. Looking at model runs after model runs for this whole winter will show all the models have been especially bad in the mid-range. So its not just the NAM. Its just historically much better in the <48hr timeframe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SBUWX23 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 I am well aware of this. All I am saying is that we dont actually know if the NAM has those same biases anymore. ALL the models have been struggling this winter in the medium range. Upgrades or not the model isn't great at the edge of its scope. It doesn't take a met to see this. Looking at model runs after model runs for this whole winter will show all the models have been especially bad in the mid-range. So its not just the NAM. Its just historically much better in the <48hr timeframe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 GFS looks amped up at hour 72. Not sure if it will be enough though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supermeh Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 GFS is introducing a new piece of energy dropping down from Canada at 72 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 GFS is introducing a new piece of energy dropping down from Canada at 72 Such a complex setup. Wouldn't surprise me if we don't see a united solution until 24-36 hours beforehand. One wave somewhere in this flow can destroy the whole setup when many of them are interacting. Another reason I enjoy Ninos better than Ninas. So much chaos in these fast-flow setups. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattinpa Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Well I will say this, joshua just called me screaming that the GFS looks amazing. I can't see it, but I haven't heard him scream like that since December 26 2010 In the MA forum they are acting sad, so I wonder if it looks like 00z GFS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bass28 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Gfs looks goood Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Gfs looks goood Its a rainstorm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Wow this run is really amped up...980s surface low just off the NJ coast...looks a little warm but we can deal with that later..the storm is huge on this run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjvesnow Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Its a rainstorm. Looks very warm! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Big coastal hugger on the GFS. Inland areas get crushed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Its a rainstorm. Dynamics would blow the roof off...we've seen this before. With that track id argue for a plastering snow once the mid level centers close off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quakertown needs snow Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Dynamics would blow the roof off...we've seen this before. With that track id argue for a plastering snow once the mid level centers close off. This is our hope! Rain to heavy wet snow? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 We might be lucky that we have this confluence, kicker and fast northern stream, lol. Otherwise, this would make a bee-line for the Lakes with a strong southern vort and a phase. Such are the perils of no-blocking setups. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian5671 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 We might be lucky that we have this confluence, kicker and fast northern stream, lol. Otherwise, this would make a bee-line for the Lakes with a strong southern vort and a phase. Such are the perils of no-blocking setups. stale airmass doesnt help either--a cold high would do wonders Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjvesnow Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 stale airmass doesnt help either--a cold high would do wonders Thank god for that 50/50 low or this is up to lakes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEG NAO Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Dynamics would blow the roof off...we've seen this before. With that track id argue for a plastering snow once the mid level centers close off. where would you draw the rain/mix/snow line at the height of the storm ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uofmiami Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Not sure if anyone saw this or posted it. But we got Pac Recon data in the GFS: NOUS42 KWNO 151458 ADMNFD SENIOR DUTY METEOROLOGIST NWS ADMINISTRATIVE MESSAGE NWS NCEP CENTRAL OPERATIONS CAMP SPRINGS MD 1454Z WED FEB 15 2012 THE 12Z NAM HAS COMPLETED WITH NO DELAYS...THE 12Z GFS HAS STARTED ON-TIME... 12Z RAOB RECAP... TAE/72214 - PURGED TEMP/RH 968-950 MB...WET BULB EFFECT NKX/72293 - PURGED TEMP/RH 851-826 MB...WET BULB EFFECT SYA/70414 - UNAVBL PPG/91765 - 10159 ADDITIONALLY...16 DROPSONDE IN SUPPORT OF WSR OPERATIONS WERE AVBL FOR GFS INGEST... $$ OREILLY/SDM/NCO/NCEP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobbieL241 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 NNJ, the Hudson Valley and interior CT get crushed on this run. That makes two "on runs" (runs with latest RAOB data) of the GFS that have this solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bass28 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Here comes the its a rainstorm comments,dynamics would be crazy in that storm.everyone calmdownn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 2nd day of correcting west , need that trend to stop here . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rjay Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Lots of short waves on this run...phased the world lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 stale airmass doesnt help either--a cold high would do wonders The dynamics would likely make it snow up to just west of the track. For the coast though, looks like a driving rain with that track. We need it a bit further east. Wouldn't matter if there's a high or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 We might be lucky that we have this confluence, kicker and fast northern stream, lol. Otherwise, this would make a bee-line for the Lakes with a strong southern vort and a phase. Such are the perils of no-blocking setups. We need some blocking to force the northern stream furser south and to prevent the southern stream from riding too far north. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ag3 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 UKIE has a 995 low off NC at hour 96. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isotherm Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 This is why we're dealing w/ a very delicate situation here, walking the tightrope as we've seen the full spectrum of model solutions over the past 24 hours from out to sea, to rainy, coastal hugger. The 50/50 low is the only thing synoptically keeping us in the game for a snow event, as someone earlier had noted. The amount of phasing we get w/ the northern stream will determine the storm's path; for us on the coast, I think we need to hope for a partial phase. A monster congealing of energy in a Nina pattern is likely to result in a plastering of the interior Northeast and garbage fest in the I-95 corridor. The flow is relatively zonal and the cold air is lacking; the confluence in sern Canada via the 50/50 should prevent a solution more amped than the 12z gfs suggest however (I'd say this run is pretty much the NW limit) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaner587 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 The dynamics would likely make it snow up to just west of the track. For the coast though, looks like a driving rain with that track. We need it a bit further east. Wouldn't matter if there's a high or not. Ya it looks like NYC west would do fine...except coastal sections (southern bklyn, southern queens). The 850line kind of straddles northern NYC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bass28 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 UKIE has a 995 low off NC at hour 96. Oh boyy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaner587 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 UKIE has a 995 low off NC at hour 96. compromise between the two...is that too much to ask for? (that is unless the UK decides to make it further up the coast) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KEITH L.I Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 GFS shows east winds for the coast during the height of the storm..it's rain for the coast..inland a different story..again the GFS is on it's own with this amped solution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.