Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Pattern looks improved for possible KU event 2/18-2/25 time range


Mikehobbyst

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 676
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Both the Euro and now the DGEX has had a MECS in I -95 next weekend in one of their runs the past 24 and the improved 18 GFS was close and we are still 5 days out - definetely alot of potential thats for sure

yes the euro, but the dgex your playing with fire lol. the 18z gfs did improve but we need to establish a nice trend in order to really get excited man. we'll see in the next few days where the chips fall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no trend right now. Every cycle is different and this has to do with the little intricacies in the flow. We wont know for sure whats going to happen for several days so dont expect a trend if tonights runs are offshore again.

yes the euro, but the dgex your playing with fire lol. the 18z gfs did improve but we need to establish a nice trend in order to really get excited man. we'll see in the next few days where the chips fall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no trend right now. Every cycle is different and this has to do with the little intricacies in the flow. We wont know for sure whats going to happen for several days so dont expect a trend if tonights runs are offshore again.

i know that why i said we need to establish a trend before we get excited. sorry if i worded it the wrong way. this is a very volatile setup and your right we may not know what may go on for several days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, over the past 10 years, I can think of only a handful of storms that did not follow either A) or B ) below :

A) Storm shows on 6 day panel, takes a hiatus for several days, and returns 84-90 HR out.

B ) Storm progged to drop drop SN+ on NC/VA 6 days out, only to actually dump a foot on the I-95 (AKA NW trend)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, over the past 10 years, I can think of only a handful of storms that did not follow either A) or B ) below :

A) Storm shows on 6 day panel, takes a hiatus for several days, and returns 84-90 HR out.

B ) Storm progged to drop drop SN+ on NC/VA 6 days out, only to actually dump a foot on the I-95 (AKA NW trend)

i was thinking more like B in this case its like the models always underestimate a branch of the jet stream be it the southern or northern stream. and this storm the past few days have been mid atlantic hits. your correct in saying not very many storms have not come up the coast the past ten years with this set up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, over the past 10 years, I can think of only a handful of storms that did not follow either A) or B ) below :

A) Storm shows on 6 day panel, takes a hiatus for several days, and returns 84-90 HR out.

B ) Storm progged to drop drop SN+ on NC/VA 6 days out, only to actually dump a foot on the I-95 (AKA NW trend)

I posted similarly earlier today. However, in a winter like this where everything that can go wrong, will go wrong, it'll probably screw us somehow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted similarly earlier today. However, in a winter like this where everything that can go wrong, will go wrong, it'll probably screw us somehow.

and then theres that tidbit that sums up our potential storms this year. we really got a legit shot at this storm but we gotta remember what can screw us has this winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted similarly earlier today. However, in a winter like this where everything that can go wrong, will go wrong, it'll probably screw us somehow.

I don't know about that entirely. We really haven't had many legit mid range threats this winter and the two actual snow events we did have, Oct 29 KU and Jan 11 SWFE actually over performed a bit so this one may be the one. I would't be surprised to see nice SECS or low end MECS out of this. We're due.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 21Z old ETA definitely does not look like it will phase the low in the southern stream with the energy diving through the central Plains. The 00Z NAM is a tough call, its very much a toss up on the 78 and 84 hour frames as to what would ultimately occur at 96-102 with those 2 disturbances.

Extrapolating the nam is dangerous but it would probably end up cutting. The southern vort misses the first northern stream wave and hangs back and would probably end up phasing with the nw energy, i think

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I'm not sure if maybe you'd rather wait for this energy to pass by...because as it is the GFS is already bringing a strong shortwave trough ashore in the Pac NW which certainly won't help us.

The shortwave trough doesn't look any faster than 18z - a hair more amplified maybe which is why the flow is more meridional to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The northern stream vort maxes are much stronger, though. The GFS trending towards having more potent energy to potentially phase with is a good sign IMO.

Yeah -- but the main piece it's trying to phase with is too far north over the Great Lakes.

The main theme continues with absolutely laughable changes in guidance at a 54-72 hr lead time which are being magnified tremendously at 84 hrs and beyond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...