NEG NAO Posted February 14, 2012 Share Posted February 14, 2012 Both the Euro and now the DGEX has had a MECS in I -95 next weekend in one of their runs the past 24 and the improved 18 GFS was close and we are still 5 days out - definetely alot of potential thats for sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blizzardof09 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Both the Euro and now the DGEX has had a MECS in I -95 next weekend in one of their runs the past 24 and the improved 18 GFS was close and we are still 5 days out - definetely alot of potential thats for sure yes the euro, but the dgex your playing with fire lol. the 18z gfs did improve but we need to establish a nice trend in order to really get excited man. we'll see in the next few days where the chips fall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SBUWX23 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 There is no trend right now. Every cycle is different and this has to do with the little intricacies in the flow. We wont know for sure whats going to happen for several days so dont expect a trend if tonights runs are offshore again. yes the euro, but the dgex your playing with fire lol. the 18z gfs did improve but we need to establish a nice trend in order to really get excited man. we'll see in the next few days where the chips fall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blizzardof09 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 There is no trend right now. Every cycle is different and this has to do with the little intricacies in the flow. We wont know for sure whats going to happen for several days so dont expect a trend if tonights runs are offshore again. i know that why i said we need to establish a trend before we get excited. sorry if i worded it the wrong way. this is a very volatile setup and your right we may not know what may go on for several days Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ericjcrash Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 The same kind of thing happened yesterday at 18z, only to be taken away at 0z, also the system has slowed down by a day or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ericjcrash Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Where do i sign? http://www.emc.ncep.....totsnow192.gif On the dotted line! Lol, seriously that would be a major storm with ~1' from DC up to NYC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mitchel Volk Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 With this winter I be surprise if this storm makes it's way up the coast. The ECMWF totally droped it and an 18Z GFS runs are normally too strong. So at this time chances are low for I-95 snow, but there is still time for things to change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Storm At Sea Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Same crap, different year. For the I-95, this system is exactly where you want it to be. There will be a north trend in the models soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blizzardof09 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Same crap, different year. For the I-95, this system is exactly where you want it to be. There will be a north trend in the models soon. how much confidence do you have in that statement buddy? im thinking the same thing due to the fact that all our big storms had nw trend with them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Storm At Sea Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Honestly, over the past 10 years, I can think of only a handful of storms that did not follow either A) or B ) below : A) Storm shows on 6 day panel, takes a hiatus for several days, and returns 84-90 HR out. B ) Storm progged to drop drop SN+ on NC/VA 6 days out, only to actually dump a foot on the I-95 (AKA NW trend) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blizzardof09 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Honestly, over the past 10 years, I can think of only a handful of storms that did not follow either A) or B ) below : A) Storm shows on 6 day panel, takes a hiatus for several days, and returns 84-90 HR out. B ) Storm progged to drop drop SN+ on NC/VA 6 days out, only to actually dump a foot on the I-95 (AKA NW trend) i was thinking more like B in this case its like the models always underestimate a branch of the jet stream be it the southern or northern stream. and this storm the past few days have been mid atlantic hits. your correct in saying not very many storms have not come up the coast the past ten years with this set up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isotherm Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Honestly, over the past 10 years, I can think of only a handful of storms that did not follow either A) or B ) below : A) Storm shows on 6 day panel, takes a hiatus for several days, and returns 84-90 HR out. B ) Storm progged to drop drop SN+ on NC/VA 6 days out, only to actually dump a foot on the I-95 (AKA NW trend) I posted similarly earlier today. However, in a winter like this where everything that can go wrong, will go wrong, it'll probably screw us somehow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blizzardof09 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 I posted similarly earlier today. However, in a winter like this where everything that can go wrong, will go wrong, it'll probably screw us somehow. and then theres that tidbit that sums up our potential storms this year. we really got a legit shot at this storm but we gotta remember what can screw us has this winter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 The 21Z old ETA definitely does not look like it will phase the low in the southern stream with the energy diving through the central Plains. The 00Z NAM is a tough call, its very much a toss up on the 78 and 84 hour frames as to what would ultimately occur at 96-102 with those 2 disturbances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Absolute Humidity Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 I posted similarly earlier today. However, in a winter like this where everything that can go wrong, will go wrong, it'll probably screw us somehow. I don't know about that entirely. We really haven't had many legit mid range threats this winter and the two actual snow events we did have, Oct 29 KU and Jan 11 SWFE actually over performed a bit so this one may be the one. I would't be surprised to see nice SECS or low end MECS out of this. We're due. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooL Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 The 21Z old ETA definitely does not look like it will phase the low in the southern stream with the energy diving through the central Plains. The 00Z NAM is a tough call, its very much a toss up on the 78 and 84 hour frames as to what would ultimately occur at 96-102 with those 2 disturbances. Extrapolating the nam is dangerous but it would probably end up cutting. The southern vort misses the first northern stream wave and hangs back and would probably end up phasing with the nw energy, i think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 The 00z GFS is already completely different than the 18z run and the 00z NAM at 54 hrs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blinkers88 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 The 00z GFS is already completely different than the 18z run and the 00z NAM at 54 hrs How so?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Lol...it's phasing in energy which came over the top of the ridge in the Pacific already at 60 hrs. The energy is really far west too..it came in over Idaho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Although I'm not sure if maybe you'd rather wait for this energy to pass by...because as it is the GFS is already bringing a strong shortwave trough ashore in the Pac NW which certainly won't help us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dsnowx53 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 The energy diving down from the north is diving in a much more meridional fashion. This would favor an earlier phase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dsnowx53 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Although I'm not sure if maybe you'd rather wait for this energy to pass by...because as it is the GFS is already bringing a strong shortwave trough ashore in the Pac NW which certainly won't help us. The shortwave trough doesn't look any faster than 18z - a hair more amplified maybe which is why the flow is more meridional to begin with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Looks pretty amped up this run..heights on the east coast are really favorable now. But the phase is still pretty sloppy so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dsnowx53 Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Looks pretty amped up this run..heights on the east coast are really favorable now. But the phase is still pretty sloppy so far. The northern stream vort maxes are much stronger, though. The GFS trending towards having more potent energy to potentially phase with is a good sign IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooL Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 the changes in the northern stream were noticeable very early in the run. This will come in more amplified, probly further N and W as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 The northern stream vort maxes are much stronger, though. The GFS trending towards having more potent energy to potentially phase with is a good sign IMO. Yeah -- but the main piece it's trying to phase with is too far north over the Great Lakes. The main theme continues with absolutely laughable changes in guidance at a 54-72 hr lead time which are being magnified tremendously at 84 hrs and beyond. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 The surface low is over Central North Carolina at 99 hours but like I said the northern stream energy is too far north over the Great Lakes. This run could actually pull the surface low along the coastal plain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mitchel Volk Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Again the models have no handle with this weather pattern. From way out to sea to a phase up that could go well west of the I-95 in two runs, I say it is anyone guess. It will be interesting to see what the King of the Medium range models say (ECMWF) in tonight's run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supermeh Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 102 looks nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 111 hours is going to send this entire board into a frenzy...good lord. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.