Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,564
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Monty
    Newest Member
    Monty
    Joined

February 10-12 Potential


earthlight

Recommended Posts

Canadian looks more than a little interesting with this storm. Look at 180 hrs. This is nearly what the Euro control run did with it yesterday morning, it caputures it before going out to sea, then bombs it out.

144 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=132&fixhh=1

156 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=144&fixhh=1

168 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=144&fixhh=1

180 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=144&fixhh=1

precip charts below

156 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=144&fixhh=1

168 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=144&fixhh=1

180 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=144&fixhh=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 940
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Canadian looks more than a little interesting with this storm. Look at 180 hrs. This is nearly what the Euro control run did with it yesterday morning, it caputures it before going out to sea, then bombs it out. http://meteocentre.com/models/explorateur.php?lang=en&map=na&run=12&mod=gemglb&stn=PNM&hh=180&comp=1&runb=12&mod2=gemglb&stn2=PNM&hh2=144&fixhh=1

Does that look warm, though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canadian looks more than a little interesting with this storm. Look at 180 hrs. This is nearly what the Euro control run did with it yesterday morning, it caputures it before going out to sea, then bombs it out.

144 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=132&fixhh=1

156 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=144&fixhh=1

168 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=144&fixhh=1

180 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=144&fixhh=1

precip charts below

156 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=144&fixhh=1

168 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=144&fixhh=1

180 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=144&fixhh=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like it would go straight out to sea after 180.

Canadian looks more than a little interesting with this storm. Look at 180 hrs. This is nearly what the Euro control run did with it yesterday morning, it caputures it before going out to sea, then bombs it out.

144 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=132&fixhh=1

156 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=144&fixhh=1

168 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=144&fixhh=1

180 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=144&fixhh=1

precip charts below

156 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=144&fixhh=1

168 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=144&fixhh=1

180 hrs. http://meteocentre.c...hh2=144&fixhh=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not so interesting. First of all, if it were surprisingly to come up the coast, there's no cold air locked in place to the north. The most likely track of it is slowly ne-ward just far enough offshore to miss us, almost but not quite like most of the other guidance indicates. Not to mention, the GGEM has been wrong time after time with these somewhat closer to the coast track scenarios this season.

WX/PT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not so interesting. First of all, if it were surprisingly to come up the coast, there's no cold air locked in place to the north. The most likely track of it is slowly ne-ward just far enough offshore to miss us, almost but not quite like most of the other guidance indicates. Not to mention, the GGEM has been wrong time after time with these somewhat closer to the coast track scenarios this season.

WX/PT

GFS and other models show a decent amount of cold air to the north. If it phases too soon, this will go inland but I doubt it with the PV that far south. If it bombs out, we don't have to worry about the cold air to the north.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This threat, is sadly, getting a bit less as we go forward.

Uh? The last run didn't show a whole lot. This run shows a big storm just offshore. It wouldn't take a lot for it to trend a little west to hit us. The storm just missed the phase on this run. We go through this same thing with every big storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This threat, is sadly, getting a bit less as we go forward.

This is sadly the truth. Not only that, the likelihood of high lattitude blocking over the mid-long range has also decreased. We need to go in reverse quickly to maps of 24-36 hours ago over the next day or two if we are to salvage the dim glimmer of hope that was there!

WX/PT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh? The last run didn't show a whole lot. This run shows a big storm just offshore. It wouldn't take a lot for it to trend a little west to hit us. The storm just missed the phase on this run. We go through this same thing with every big storm.

HPC and many others are writing this off already its quite obvious why.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is sadly the truth. Not only that, the likelihood of high lattitude blocking over the mid-long range has also decreased. We need to go in reverse quickly to maps of 24-36 hours ago over the next day or two if we are to salvage the dim glimmer of hope that was there!

WX/PT

It's ridiculous to write this off now. And we can get snow without blocking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Famartin's posts include certain propositons which are important to keep in mind:

1/ If you reside in what he considers a non-snow town, any snowfall measurement that appears inordinately high is subject to examination and question.

2/ If you reside in what he considers a non-snow town, any snowfall measurement that seem inordinately low is sacrosanct...especially if it was taken by the FAA or NWS.

3/ If you reside in what he considers a snow town, any snowfall measurement that appears inordinately high is probably justifiable.

4/ If you reside in what he considers a snow town, any snowfall measurement that appears inordinately low is potentially wrong.

5/ Snow towns can be found throughout New England, save for the extreme south coast. All of NY state is snow town territory, except for NYC and LI. None of NJ is snow town territory, except for Sussex, Warren, Morris, and Passaic counties...and N. Bergen on good days. Most of eastern PA is snow town territory, save for the SE portion (think SE of a line from Harrisburg to Allentown). No one south of the Mason Dixon Line lives in a snow town, except if they are in the mountains.

6/ Weenies are found almost exclusively in non-snow towns.

*The 5th propositon does have considerable basis in reality.

tl;dr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The upper level low captured the surface low and pulled it hundreds and hundreds of miles west, and may still be pulling it further north and west at 180 hrs. We simply don't know. And what if this happens further north, then we would be in the game. Of course, it is more likely that it won't happen at all, but who knows?

With HP off the coast, you don't really think that it would hold in place do you? Not to mention, the GFS is rapidly progressive with each system over this period. There is no blocking. How can you have it both ways?

WX/PT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The upper level low captured the surface low and pulled if hundreds and hundreds of miles west, and may still be pulling it further north and west at 180 hrs. We simply don't know. And what if this happens further north, then we would be in the game. Of course, it is more likely that it won't happen at all, but who knows?

That seems the reasonable view to me. It's far from a sure thing, but it's worthy of promise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also watched many people write off the December 26, 2010 storm and the October storm. This storm is a week away. No one knows for sure what will happen. I agree though that it is unlikely.

There is no blocking - there hasn't been any blocking all winter and there is no blocking forecasted - totally different situation then 2010 - we have not had one storm come up the coast to phase and produce a snowstorm this winter and the pattern did not change enough to produce one now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...