Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

February 10-12 Potential


earthlight

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 940
  • Created
  • Last Reply

That's easy to say for those who only looked at the future radar and not at the QPF amounts and P-type... through hour 15 NYC barely gets an inch of snow despite the nice looking storm on the radar. Besides, the HRRR/RR didn't handle the last storm very well, I think one of their runs that evening even initialized with a 25dbz band covering most of NYC.

I actually thought the HRRR did pretty well... I'm not particularly crazy about the composite radar.. but it looked as if we would only get a few mangled flakes based on other guidance, but the HRRR at least had forecasted a minor accumulation, which is what we got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NAM has a tendency to cut back on precip the run prior to the start of an event; it would not suprise me if the 0z run is a lower QPF than what actually falls....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually thought the HRRR did pretty well... I'm not particularly crazy about the composite radar.. but it looked as if we would only get a few mangled flakes based on other guidance, but the HRRR at least had forecasted a minor accumulation, which is what we got.

In the short range, it did well with the QPF amounts (the radar is a different story as it looked better than what the QPF amounts reflected). In the HRRR's longer range though for the same day, I think it showed the QPF too far north as well before trending south as it got closer to the evening hours. It wasn't terrible, but the HRRR isn't the best short range model in many cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the short range, it did well with the QPF amounts (the radar is a different story as it looked better than what the QPF amounts reflected). In the HRRR's longer range though for the same day, I think it showed the QPF too far north as well before trending south as it got closer to the evening hours. It wasn't terrible, but the HRRR isn't the best short range model in many cases.

ah, ok.. I really only glanced at it during one particular time frame and didn't follow it throughout the day. I must have caught it during a good time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find if you're gonna use SIM radars the SPC WRF is the best with these snow events, its 12Z run today was not bad, we'll see if the 00Z tonight which comes out around 1am still looks as good.

cool.. thanks.. will keep that in mind.. I haven't had much experience in learning about the good and bad of the short range models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to believe that the Euro and the ensembles would bust this close to an event. The Euro was a little west this afternoon lol

There was a similar mesoscale type event last winter in January where many forecast 8-12 inches for eastern sections and the models briefly hinted in that direction only to basically the lose the norlun feature and the upper dynamics and I think most people saw 1-3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although the storm scenarios are not similar, the trending with the models with this storm reminds me of last year's April 1 storm and another storm around March 2, 2010 (winter of 09-10). With the April 1 storm, the models noticeably shifted east in the day before the storm with the result only light rain and non-accumulating snow for most, with the March 2, 2010 storm trending west on some models a day before the storm while quickly returning east. The latest models continue to trend drier, and while perhaps some could be a bit too dry, it would not surprise me at all if I end up with barely an inch, if not a bit less, on grassy surfaces by tomorrow afternoon when the main event ends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gfs .10 city south.....from southern Monmouth county south its. 25+.....the interved trough hits them.

.25 + yes, but it's gets there with pretty much flurries every hour for 36 hrs. Weird, if that actually happens, Probibly would nt have more than inch on ground during any time within the next 36 hrs. Still, this is cool to track as the unexpected could still deny or surprise many.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Nam/GFS are right, forget about any pavement accumulations, or maybe even much accumulation at all in the city and near the coast. Might be just a sloppy light mix or drizzle. Only this winter. :axe:

RGEM still looks encouraging for maybe some real accumulations.

If other short range models start to look better than the NAM/GFS, then I might reconsider my thoughts on this storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the 0z run of SUNY MM 5 is to be believed..it will snow on most of Long Island for no more than about 4 hours...from about 5:30 AM - 9:30 AM...and not heavily...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...