Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,608
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Southeast February Mid/Long Range Discussion II


Marion_NC_WX

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Too warm for most, good run for the mountains, western TN, maybe the foothills as the low departs, but look at the 850 map, flow would be out of the south-southwest @ 132 hr with a potential 850 close off near the OH Valley. Canadian kind of stands alone atm, 12z UKMET looks similar to the GFS, weak perturbation crossing the FL peninsula before starting to deepen somewhere between NC and Bermuda, closer to Bermuda. Another thing, I would like to see at-least a couple of the GFS individual members showing a hit at this range, and over the past 3-4 runs not even 1 or 2 have. Sure a few looked interesting, but the overwhelming agreement was too little too late, amplified frontal passage with a weak wave well to the south. Even if we do get a storm, more interaction is going to be needed between the streams to trend it colder, because as it stands now, looking too warm for most outside of elevation.

Its not done loading just yet, but already p001 shows a hit.... 999 SLP just off ILM... and the other 3 that I have loaded are pretty close to hits. The mean looks promising as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Euro does hold in a CAD high and breaks out precip in north GA which would likely be some sort of frozen....but again, with all these model flip-flops we cannot trust anything right now- some are talking about this storm on the CMC which the Euro does not even have a hint of. We just have to realize that any forecast beyond day 3 right now is pretty close to impossible. That is why I am not really following stuff that closely right now, hanging on every model run will accomplish little except give you whiplash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like others have said, Euro has shown something interesting before, then takes it away, only to show up again later on down the road a couple days before the event. That's what happened in the Christmas 2010 snow, and it was an event depending on phasing as well.

That was kind of different, several runs were showing an Epic snowstorm in the 6-7 day range, plus there was other model agreement. I don't see any indication of a sig or even insignificant storm with p-type issues in the next 5 or 6 days, sure it could magically appear but the odds are heavily against. As I stated, you would like to see at-least a couple of individual members show something of consequence, which would be an indication of a certain amount of variability in the system.

Positives, taking the 12z op Euro at its word, there is a period of about 72 hrs, between 126 and 198, where it is cold enough for SN, now we just need some moisture to work with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting I haven't kept track of the Ensemble members. That certainly is not good news. By the way I didn't think the CMC looked great temp wise, just posting that there in case some were interested. I always want to see those dark blues on the 850 maps to get excited by the CMC.

If you're not keeping track of the ensemble members, you're missing half the forecasting battle.

The ensemble mean smooths things out and can give you an idea on temps and heights.

Look at the individual members to see what kind of agreement there is. If the majority of the ensembles are showing a similar evolution, that means that even with varying data, the models are all coming to a similar solution, which means its a fairly likely outcome.

I was excited this weekend, because 3-4 of the members were bringing the low up through the florida and up the east coast.

But those have disappeared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're not keeping track of the ensemble members, you're missing half the forecasting battle.

The ensemble mean smooths things out and can give you an idea on temps and heights.

Look at the individual members to see what kind of agreement there is. If the majority of the ensembles are showing a similar evolution, that means that even with varying data, the models are all coming to a similar solution, which means its a fairly likely outcome.

I was excited this weekend, because 3-4 of the members were bringing the low up through the florida and up the east coast.

But those have disappeared.

I actually counted 6 ensemble members that were closer to the coast than the OP and 2, maybe 3 that would be good hits

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you please interpret?

TW

Currently in phase 7. Phases 7-1 would be good for the SE winter storm development based on the JFM temp & precip composites.

Precip:

http://www.cpc.ncep....bined_image.png

Temp:

http://www.cpc.ncep....bined_image.png

Read more here.

http://www.cpc.ncep....O/mjoupdate.pdf

It's hard to grasp considering there's a lot to it...but most people think phases 7, 8 and 1 are "good" to be in for our chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're not keeping track of the ensemble members, you're missing half the forecasting battle.

The ensemble mean smooths things out and can give you an idea on temps and heights.

Look at the individual members to see what kind of agreement there is. If the majority of the ensembles are showing a similar evolution, that means that even with varying data, the models are all coming to a similar solution, which means its a fairly likely outcome.

I was excited this weekend, because 3-4 of the members were bringing the low up through the florida and up the east coast.

But those have disappeared.

I know what the Ensembles are and why they are used...I should have clarified for this storm I haven't been keeping track of individual members.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...