Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Models Backed Off Long Range Cold


bluewave

Recommended Posts

Although the potential definitely is there for some more cold and perhaps 1 or 2 snow potentials in the Feb 4-15 time frame, The GEFS are once again following the classic trend of a very nice set up in the long range which becomes more realistic and less favorable as it gets closer to the 192 hour range. This is what the GEFS showed 3 days ago for February 6:

post-1753-0-73407400-1327849294.gif

In contrast, this is what the latest GEFS are showing for the same time frame. Although the western ridge is still there, the slight ridging near Greenland has been replaced by a trough and the eastern US trough is less impressive than what it was. It's still going to change from now to the short range, but it doesn't look as favorable as it did a couple of days ago. The GEFS now pushed the improvements in Greenland to the hour 324-384 hour range, showing that although we are definitely seeing some changes, the much more favorable pattern is still staying in the fantasy range for now.

post-1753-0-59055900-1327849299.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know bluewave, changed the title of this thread. But I wanted follow on the post about Euro Ensembles here.

The models are backing of the cold air in the long range, because there not bring the PV as far south, into Hudson Bay/SE Canada as they were before. The 0z/02 Euro ensemble bring the PV over NW tip of Queebec by 192hrs, than lifts back north over Baffin Island by 240hrs. That would not support below normal temps, for more than 1 or 2 days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No blocking, no huge PNA ridge, no real way of locking cold air in here=transient shots that last a day or two. Unless that changes I just don't see a big threat around here. Maybe some minor stuff, that's it. I guess the one positive is that the PV over Alaska moved SW to the Aleutians.

In other words, bring on spring (not that it really feels that different from it now).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if the AO,NAO,EPO, or PNA indexes are favorable, we still can't get the PV out of the high lattiudes. That's problem with getting sustained cold this winter. Most of the time, it's been over Alaska,Sibera,Northern Canada, or Greenland.

We need it over central Canada. A PV over Alaska or even the Gulf of Alaska does no good, because it only serves to flood the CONUS with stale Pacific air. We also need it to be locked there by high heights near Greenland and NE Canada. We just can't get that at all this winter, and as a result it's been horrendous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if the AO,NAO,EPO, or PNA indexes are favorable, we still can't get the PV out of the high lattiudes. That's problem with getting sustained cold this winter. Most of the time, it's been over Alaska,Sibera,Northern Canada, or Greenland.

The 12z GFS brings the PV south enough to affect our area.

And like you said, it shows a sustained period of cold for our area, as a result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so far NYC has only 23 days out of 64 so far this winter with a minimum of 32 or lower...we will break this record of 47 days set in 2001-02 if the pattern doesn't change soon...

The Record...

Seasons with the least amount of min days 32 degrees or lower.

min days.

47 2001-02

49 1997-98

50 1998-99

53 1982-83

54 1990-91

57 1996-97

59 1952-53

59 1972-73

60 1957-58

60 1994-95

67 2005-06

63 2006-07

64 2007-08

86 2008-09

63 2009-10

84 2010-11

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 0z OP ECMWF and it's ensemble mean, has PV further north in Canada again and the pacific jet undercutting the ridge out West. Overall, the continued lack of model consistency or agreement, leads me to have low confidence in any sustained cold or major winter storms along the East Coast, during the Feb. 10-15 period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 0z OP ECMWF and it's ensemble mean, has PV further north in Canada again and the pacific jet undercutting the ridge out West. Overall, the continued lack of model consistency or agreement, leads me to have low confidence in any sustained cold or major winter storms along the East Coast, during the Feb. 10-15 period.

You know its a warm pattern when we can't get the -EPO do deliver a sustained period of cold here.

It looks like the rest of the pattern is keeping the PV further north than we normally see with the -EPO.

Many times in the past this pattern was able to register at least a week below normal temperatures here.

I guess the winter pattern of transient cold shots for a few days than a warm up is really tough to beat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on the trend this winter the models will continue to warm. I think we get one shot of modified arctic followed by a quick warm up.The name of the game this winter has and will continue to be the trend. No matter what the models show moving forward in the long range i would take it with a grain of salt until and if we see the magic large scale pattern change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...