Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,566
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Monty
    Newest Member
    Monty
    Joined

First half of February...another pattern shift?


ORH_wxman

Recommended Posts

Having the polar jet dive far enough south to get moisture feed out of the subtropics is not the same as getting your typical subtropical jet. There is a reason that DC and BWI got skunked last winter...lack of STJ and a little bad luck.

Any time you get the PJ diving far enough south, its going to draw moisture out of the subtropics, but it doesn't mean we have an active STJ with disturbances rolling in all the time.

Loop it

http://www.meteo.psu...2011/us0125.php

There might have been some weak STJ interaction, but nothing compared to an El Nino...last year was made by the PJ and most Nina years are. Even if you wanted to say the 1/27 storm was a big STJ storm (which it wasn't), you still have all those other systems that had nothing to do with it.

This is exactly the point I'm making as well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I agree... but again, that's incidental because the N stream excited the gradient so much. Deep gradient causes compression in the flow at lower latitudes - there has to be some southerly input when that happens. Again, you are going to get that every time the N stream is dominant enough to drill heights deeply beneath 40N.

Agreed...sort of explained this in the post above too. When the PJ gets far enough south, it will draw moisture out of the subtropics...and will become moisture laden from that source regardless if the STJ is humming along or totally absent.

When the STJ is active, you get much more phasing and storms develop further south, but you can still get subtropical moisture without it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is exactly the point I'm making as well...

Eh, beat me to my reply...yeah we are def on the same page about this PJ interaction with the subtropics. Pretty classic too...it happened in the Jan 1996 blizzard for the Mid-atlantic (merely a big snowstorm for us except the southeast parts and south coast where it was on par with the Mid-Atlantic totals).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, beat me to my reply...yeah we are def on the same page about this PJ interaction with the subtropics. Pretty classic too...it happened in the Jan 1996 blizzard for the Mid-atlantic (merely a big snowstorm for us except the southeast parts and south coast where it was on par with the Mid-Atlantic totals).

Ha ha. right. Question: are we currently dumping cold on the wrong side of the pole - is this one of THOSE -AOs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

will have you given up on the sun-mon time period for a storm threat

or do you still think we have some time to work in a solution that may give us a snow....seems there is still time ...and w/ model chaos (some hope)

There's some slim hope, but I wouldn't expect anything. These Feb 3-6 threats have always been walking a tight rope and were before the change set in.

Scott's concern about the longevity is valid, but it also looks like if we did get a break, it wouldn't be long lasting....as heights try to build again late in the period.

Our window is def Feb 10-13...then hopefully some more beyond that whether there is a relaxation or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, beat me to my reply...yeah we are def on the same page about this PJ interaction with the subtropics. Pretty classic too...it happened in the Jan 1996 blizzard for the Mid-atlantic (merely a big snowstorm for us except the southeast parts and south coast where it was on par with the Mid-Atlantic totals).

It's a little bit ironic that the '96 blizzard is largely the king for the Mid-Atlantic and the NYC area, had little STJ inflow in it.

Because, you know, one would expect the STJ would be king.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a little bit ironic that the '96 blizzard is largely the king for the Mid-Atlantic and the NYC area, had little STJ inflow in it.

Because, you know, one would expect the STJ would be king.

When we get a El Nino winter the STJ tends to be king - whether other factors serve favorably is another story.  We've seen STJ winters be prolific, and also suck equally as hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's some slim hope, but I wouldn't expect anything. These Feb 3-6 threats have always been walking a tight rope and were before the change set in.

Scott's concern about the longevity is valid, but it also looks like if we did get a break, it wouldn't be long lasting....as heights try to build again late in the period.

Our window is def Feb 10-13...then hopefully some more beyond that whether there is a relaxation or not.

yes but that could potenitally turn on the next two euro runs and the gfs MJO amplitude could show the current wave weakening and limping into phase 8 then dying off ....so yes hopefully this doesn't happen lol.

but like u say we got feb 10-13 to get a big one......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is still a pretty large disagreement among the models regarding the west. It's still a little puzzling why the EC just destroys that ridge, but regardless..it still happens. It does try to rebuild the ridging somewhat in the longer range, but not before torching the CONUS. I mean..one would think the tropical forcing would boost ridging, but perhaps the MJO amplitude is not enough as depicted on the EC. My guess is the euro may have the right idea but the big question will be whether or not ridging tries to develop after any break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is still a pretty large disagreement among the models regarding the west. It's still a little puzzling why the EC just destroys that ridge, but regardless..it still happens. It does try to rebuild the ridging somewhat in the longer range, but not before torching the CONUS. I mean..one would think the tropical forcing would boost ridging, but perhaps the MJO amplitude is not enough as depicted on the EC. My guess is the euro may have the right idea but the big question will be whether or not ridging tries to develop after any break.

It's this winter...that's why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's this winter...that's why.

Like I've said the last 2 days..it's concerning for sure. However, it's also possible that some ridging does try to come back. It could very well be fleeting or not happen, but we'll have to see going forward. Regardless, the euro ensembles are vomit worthy in the 11-15 day. What happens after...who knows, but It's February and nice Spring wx ain't coming anytime soon, so hopefully the ridging comes back. It's not uncommon to have breaks with these patterns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is still a pretty large disagreement among the models regarding the west. It's still a little puzzling why the EC just destroys that ridge, but regardless..it still happens. It does try to rebuild the ridging somewhat in the longer range, but not before torching the CONUS. I mean..one would think the tropical forcing would boost ridging, but perhaps the MJO amplitude is not enough as depicted on the EC. My guess is the euro may have the right idea but the big question will be whether or not ridging tries to develop after any break.

I looked at the OLR stuff from the 1/31 0z Euro ENS and the tropical forcing for a +PNA stops after Feb 10-11, then the IO picks up and the Pac is ugly again. Roundy as recently as the weekend had a solid 7 days of P8 forcing... now it's down to 2-3 days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I looked at the OLR stuff from the 1/31 0z Euro ENS and the tropical forcing for a +PNA stops after Feb 10-11, then the IO picks up and the Pac is ugly again. Roundy as recently as the weekend had a solid 7 days of P8 forcing... now it's down to 2-3 days.

That's how it looked to me too, but to see it sh*t the bed so quick was a little puzzling. The ridge craps the bed around the 10th. Usually there is somewhat of a delay..it's not like there is an immediate adjustment when tropical forcing diminishes. However maybe the amplitude is only briefly high enough to pop the ridge. There is still a low in the Aleutians beyond mid month which would try to pop a ridge again, but that is far off and the MJO starts getting back into the crap phases so who really knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CFS back to an absolute torch in FEB (maybe >AN map than JAN if that's possible)

http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/people/wwang/cfs_fcst/images3/usT2mMon.gif

CFS wins this winter hands down

If they are right for April and May it would almost be worth it. But. They won't be. Mitch, you've never suffered if you haven't spent April in New England.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is hard to trust any model at this point...even short range. yesterday late afternoon zone said low of 32 and rain today. I wake up to 25 and a wwa for freezing rain today. in terms of some ridge on the west coast, i won't believe it until it is actually there and not on some model. Same with MJO forecasts...it is currently in Phase 6? Then that is where it is until it moves... I believe no model forecast. There is something happening this year that is anomalous that experts don't have a handle on (except Don S it seems). I wonder what it is that the models are missing?

I can't wait for the next DT meltdown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is hard to trust any model at this point...even short range. yesterday late afternoon zone said low of 32 and rain today. I wake up to 25 and a wwa for freezing rain today. in terms of some ridge on the west coast, i won't believe it until it is actually there and not on some model. Same with MJO forecasts...it is currently in Phase 6? Then that is where it is until it moves... I believe no model forecast. There is something happening this year that is anomalous that experts don't have a handle on (except Don S it seems). I wonder what it is that the models are missing?

I can't wait for the next DT meltdown.

You're such a nice guy that this may qualify as a meltdown...lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is hard to trust any model at this point...even short range. yesterday late afternoon zone said low of 32 and rain today. I wake up to 25 and a wwa for freezing rain today. in terms of some ridge on the west coast, i won't believe it until it is actually there and not on some model. Same with MJO forecasts...it is currently in Phase 6? Then that is where it is until it moves... I believe no model forecast. There is something happening this year that is anomalous that experts don't have a handle on (except Don S it seems). I wonder what it is that the models are missing?

I can't wait for the next DT meltdown.

Don S has been going on analogs pretty strongly and it has worked out. It's not a surprise when you see the main features in place and know that models try to change patterns to quickly, when they are stable. It's also why many of us in December said that we are screwed with an AK vortex even if models briefly try to show a change. We know from analogs and past experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I looked at the OLR stuff from the 1/31 0z Euro ENS and the tropical forcing for a +PNA stops after Feb 10-11, then the IO picks up and the Pac is ugly again. Roundy as recently as the weekend had a solid 7 days of P8 forcing... now it's down to 2-3 days.

That probably explains part of it too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...