Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

February 2012 General Discussion


Nic

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 943
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Let's hope. The latest storm if you can even call it that for my area for you it was pretty good but anyways it only produced a couple inches at best. I'm hoping that these next couple of weeks produces more than that like 6+'' but I am getting too ahead of myself lol

Agreed.

The previous storm was good by this season's standards (even the forecasters were over-hyping it, which shows how sorry snowstorn-wise this season has been), but not by a typical Detroit winter standards, epsecially considering the fact that it wasn't even a WWA event.

I'm not giving up on February 16th yet. It has ton of potential for anyone north of I-70, especially if it closes off at 500mb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed.

The previous storm was good by this season's standards (even the forecasters were over-hyping it, which shows how sorry snowstorn-wise this season has been), but not by a typical Detroit winter standards, epsecially considering the fact that it wasn't even a WWA event.

I'm not giving up on February 16th yet. It has ton of potential for anyone north of I-70, especially if it closes off at 500mb.

It was probably slightly hyped because way more snow fell than was forecast. And it WAS a WWA event, just no advisory was issued. I will NEVER rate a snowstorm based on the headline or lack of one that was issued (or else GHD would get bonus points for having up to 15" of snow in the headline). The snowfall parameters clearly met advisory criteria and the blowing/drifting snow was an extra hazard. I do however agree that this winters standards certainly made it seem like a harsher storm that if it had been in any of the last several winters. And I sure hope youre right about Feb 16th, you are an outlier now lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was looking at the LAF obs from V Day 2007 on wunderground, and noticed that the record high for February 14th is apparently 111º set in 2002. Sure enough. :D

METAR KLAF 150454Z 23011KT 10SM CLR 044/M07 A3005 RMK SLP179 T00391067

LOL. There was some convection associated with that snow event right? Nocturnal heat burst? :lmao:

EDIT: Woops, wasn't even the right year lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello all, I haven't been around much this winter because this has the worst winter of my lifetime so far. I saw flakes today for just the third time this season, for the third time I got just a trace of snow. The roofs and cars got covered and well that's about it. I'm ready for the warmer air to move on in because I've about had it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello all, I haven't been around much this winter because this has the worst winter of my lifetime so far. I saw flakes today for just the third time this season, for the third time I got just a trace of snow. The roofs and cars got covered and well that's about it. I'm ready for the warmer air to move on in because I've about had it.

Been a rough winter for all involved. Hopefully next year's edition is much better. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was looking at the LAF obs from V Day 2007 on wunderground, and noticed that the record high for February 14th is apparently 111º set in 2002. Sure enough. :D

METAR KLAF 150454Z 23011KT 10SM CLR 044/M07 A3005 RMK SLP179 T00391067

Just a bit warm, one hell of an inverted V sounding too probably :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no exper,t but the recent NAO has a different flatter look. Even a potential not (+ve) look in late Feb. Snow breeds snow, so lets all hope that winter becomes winter and not an over extended fall.

I think that ship has set sail.

btw...can you explain your second sentence to me. I'm not familiar with the term "+ve".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bets with BowMe updated. LSE gets to 20" after yesterday's snowfall. Bet #1 almost locked up. :guitar:

Bet #1 - MKE and LSE not getting to 20" for the season (season totals thru 2/13)

MKE: 17.8"

LSE: 20.0"

Bet #2 - Most snow the rest of the way...January 3 to present snowfall

LAF: 15.0" (thru 2/14)

MKE: 16.1" (thru 2/13)

YYZ: 6.9" (thru 2/11)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, mid-feb....only about a month left of realistic big snow potential to go.

Still some "historical chances" for a 10"+ snowstorm for Chicago. Official 10"+ snowstorms post February 14th in recorded history.

March 23-24, 1897: 10.0"

February 28, 1900: 11.3"

February 18-19, 12.8"

March 30-31, 1926: 12.6"

March 25-26, 1930: 19.2"

March 7-8, 1931: 16.2"

March 2-3, 1954: 11.8"

February 23-25, 1965: 11.5"

March 25-26, 1970: 14.3"

April 1-2, 1970: 10.7"

February 18, 2000: 11.1"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still some "historical chances" for a 10"+ snowstorm for Chicago. Official 10"+ snowstorms post February 14th in recorded history.

March 23-24, 1897: 10.0"

February 28, 1900: 11.3"

February 18-19, 12.8"

March 30-31, 1926: 12.6"

March 25-26, 1930: 19.2"

March 7-8, 1931: 16.2"

March 2-3, 1954: 11.8"

February 23-25, 1965: 11.5"

March 25-26, 1970: 14.3"

April 1-2, 1970: 10.7"

February 18, 2000: 11.1"

Thanks, pretty slim pickings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, pretty slim pickings.

Well, that's 11 of the total 45 "official" 10"+ snowstorms in recorded history. So yeah, 75% of them happened somewhere from November to mid February. Not surprising I guess. Sorta interesting though that 7 of those 11 storms happened in March or April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...