Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Vesuvius
    Newest Member
    Vesuvius
    Joined

January 22-23 Northern Plains Cyclone


Recommended Posts

Alright, since Cmichweather was too much of a wimp to start a thread, I decided I will. We definitely need something on this as there will be some low/mid level inverted trough associated snowfall across ND/northern MN. A pretty classic setup for ND as inverted troughs are almost always associated with the better snow events.

Much of the snowfall is going to line up along the relatively narrow divergent jet axis ejecting ahead of the mean trough. There really isn't going to be a lot of synoptic scale mass ascent as the strongest upper height falls will be relegated to the base of the trough as the secondary speed max ejects into the OV/Great Lakes.

post-999-0-74892000-1327185164.gif

Classic inverted trof on the GFS through ND.

post-999-0-28276000-1327185301.gif

GOM is closed as usual, so PWATS are pretty pathetic.

post-999-0-87100300-1327185516.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should be worth noting all guidance suggests an impressive dual jet configuration aloft and a very favorable (not narrow) region of mesoscale mass ascent. This will be the precip producer. RGEM and NAM both stall (to a small degree) the inverted trough as the southern anomaly ejects into the Great Lakes. Either way the potential exists someone gets 6" under enhanced meso banding given the favorable jet divergence.

post-999-0-26920700-1327186151.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

0Z NAM still trying to adjust to the strength of the lead anomaly. In fact, the NAM hints at what the RGEM was suggesting earlier...a dominant lead anomaly and strong cyclogenesis well west of the OV/Great Lakes. This looks much more interesting than the 2 part solutions which emphasize the southern speed max.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha I saw your comment, but when I went to your thread I didn't see any specific discussion. Seems like the events to follow are the high wind event (although probably not specific to ABQ) and the incoming cutoff.

exactly...we don't have anyone who can do analysis like you can...and it's an all encompassing thread since there are so few posters and such a large geographical area covered...

i was hoping you could give some insight into what the cut-off will do in my area...like the same type of stuff you post in here when you are doing an analysis of your area...but visit my thread :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

exactly...we don't have anyone who can do analysis like you can...and it's an all encompassing thread since there are so few posters and such a large geographical area covered...

i was hoping you could give some insight into what the cut-off will do in my area...like the same type of stuff you post in here when you are doing an analysis of your area...but visit my thread :)

Yeah it is definitely a problem. Personally I don't see any reason why we have NM part of the TX discussion...it just doesn't fit. It would be closer to the MT West disco...even then the region is still too all encompassing...but it would fit better there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and of course the 12z GFS now shifts that further east across SE MN and western WI.

12z euro giving msp 0.30...0.24 of that looks all snow

SUN 18Z 22-JAN  -2.8    -5.6    1005      74      57    0.01     549     545    
MON 00Z 23-JAN  -2.2    -4.7    1003      89      59    0.02     546     544    
MON 06Z 23-JAN  -2.5    -4.8    1002      93      61    0.03     541     540    
MON 12Z 23-JAN  -4.1    -6.9    1003      88      99    0.11     535     533    
MON 18Z 23-JAN  -2.9   -10.2    1006      76      96    0.11     536     532    
TUE 00Z 24-JAN  -3.7   -10.4    1011      74      71    0.02     541     532    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sloppy and disorganized storm up there...the crappy PWATS and deep southern stream anomaly really kept this from getting any organization together. Seems freezing drizzle and freezing fog will be the bigger problem.

WARNING. NO ICE CRYSTALS IN CLOUD. ;)

It's been 25 and freezing drizzle all day here in MSP. Just got home from work and the side roads/sidewalks/parking lots are complete crap, but highways are fine.

Looks like we are finally getting a bit of deeper moisture in the area soon so should start to see some snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WARNING. NO ICE CRYSTALS IN CLOUD. ;)

It's been 25 and freezing drizzle all day here in MSP. Just got home from work and the side roads/sidewalks/parking lots are complete crap, but highways are fine.

Looks like we are finally getting a bit of deeper moisture in the area soon so should start to see some snow.

What a soupy mess. The RAP surface map shows the massive region of IFR.

post-999-0-34451000-1327300139.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to work for a private company that forecast for Iowa DOT. Did they do much pretreating of the roads beforehand?

Not that I noticed, but I was on county and city roads, even if they had we switched over to plain old rain/drizzle for most of the afternoon into the early evening so I'm not sure how effective pre-treating would have been. Did a good job of getting the roads cleared though, while they were lousy when I went to class at 9 am, by the time I went home at 11:30 conditions were much improved(Salted and sanded the heck out of the roads, esp the county).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...