Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

2012 Winter Banter Thread #2


yoda

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'm defending the process of how we dealt with this stuff years ago...back when the board was a bit more fun than it is now....that dude turned me off when he made some comments on 40s....to be honest I'm not sure why you and Andy have such a hard on for BB but no matter...I am not relevant on this board anymore...not that I ever was...but it just seems odd to me....and not really fun.

peace

I'm lonely

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you pegged this well in one of your posts yesterday. It really is embarrassing.

im a huge skeptic of long range forecasting -- at least out past like 2-4 weeks and 4 is really pushing it. i think there are a handful of people who have had enough success from year to year that they may be onto something tho even with most of them some of the methodology is pretty questionable imo. bb may be on to something.. i don't have any skil in that area whatsoever outside being able to play around with climo numbers and enso etc to make some sort of random guess. from what i've seen a lot of it is pretty iffy and even the best at it are pretty good at spin to make their initial forecast easier to verify. but bb has a long history of just trying to get people to give him attention.. hard to say if this is something else. alas, the whole episode may no longer just be embarrasing to him. i don't think there is necessarily a need to hammer away nonstop until you get an answer like some others do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly....and all we did was make fun....fun being the key word...seriously if BB was able to back up his ideas with some serious science....how many of us would really know...this is some funny s hit and I honestly am wondering if it's all a joke.

You mean like the time Jim Hughes left because he was humiliated over his El Nino call? Or we enraged Jeb to the point where he was threatening to shoot up the conference.

All in good fun.

Thing is, this group has always been like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im a huge skeptic of long range forecasting -- at least out past like 2-4 weeks and 4 is really pushing it. i think there are a handful of people who have had enough success from year to year that they may be onto something tho even with most of them some of the methodology is pretty questionable imo. bb may be on to something.. i don't have any skil in that area whatsoever outside being able to play around with climo numbers and enso etc to make some sort of random guess. from what i've seen a lot of it is pretty iffy and even the best at it are pretty good at spin to make their initial forecast easier to verify. but bb has a long history of just trying to get people to give him attention.. hard to say if this is something else. alas, the whole episode may no longer just be embarrasing to him. i don't think there is necessarily a need to hammer away nonstop until you get an answer like some others do.

Might want to step in somewhere around grandiose announcement of leaving/never returning and creepily-cryptic statements about what might happen at the next conference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean like the time Jim Hughes left because he was humiliated over his El Nino call? Or we enraged Jeb to the point where he was threatening to shoot up the conference.

All in good fun.

Thing is, this group has always been like this.

I see your point...still feels different...I am not arguing the end results...just the process being different...anyhow I have posted more today than I have in months...I need to shower now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha...I probably would but I haven't met you yet..perhaps one day..I just don't live here much anymore like I used to..hard to get to know the newer people...newer as in the last few years

Come to the conference, you will see I am likable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wes, HM, Adam and DonS should do a joint presentation at this year's conference going into why the winter forecast busted for so many mets and how we can use the results to improve future forecasts.

Wes and I posted back and forth a bit about thissome time ago. In my simpleton research, the big +AO anom in Nov and Dec was a glaring signal for temp trouble in Dec & Jan. Because I don't have knowledge or skill to understand why the AO did what it did, I can't add much more than just saying there were signs. I think if the root cause could be identified, there is a good bit of info to be gleaned as to why Dec/Jan were basically warm duds.

Something happened at high latitudes (or somewhere in the northern hemisphere) during mid november that pushed the AO all the way to +4 by early December. That isn't a common occurance at all. It would be awesome if Wes, HM, Adam, and DonS did some research to the factors leading up to the anomalous event. I'm very interested.

I didn't do the same research with strong -AO Nov/Decembers but looking at the monthlies, the AO signal behaves the same way in reverse. I'm just a weenie but I think there is something there to look into and it could possibly help making winter calls. At the very least it could potentially help making Dec-Jan temp calls. I do plan on pulling all the -AO Nov/Decembers where the index averaged -1 or more and runnning daily graphs and seasonal averages. It's probably worth the effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wes and I posted back and forth a bit about thissome time ago. In my simpleton research, the big +AO anom in Nov and Dec was a glaring signal for temp trouble in Dec & Jan. Because I don't have knowledge or skill to understand why the AO did what it did, I can't add much more than just saying there were signs. I think if the root cause could be identified, there is a good bit of info to be gleaned as to why Dec/Jan were basically warm duds.

Something happened at high latitudes (or somewhere in the northern hemisphere) during mid november that pushed the AO all the way to +4 by early December. That isn't a common occurance at all. It would be awesome if Wes, HM, Adam, and DonS did some research to the factors leading up to the anomalous event. I'm very interested.

I didn't do the same research with strong -AO Nov/Decembers but looking at the monthlies, the AO signal behaves the same way in reverse. I'm just a weenie but I think there is something there to look into and it could possibly help making winter calls. At the very least it could potentially help making Dec-Jan temp calls. I do plan on pulling all the -AO Nov/Decembers where the index averaged -1 or more and runnning daily graphs and seasonal averages. It's probably worth the effort.

I think you'll find the strong negative ao events also are pretty stable. Don S. did something on that during 2009-2010. I don't really know what led to the strong vortex but know when I see one to be pretty cautious about forecasting a pattern change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct me if I'm wrong, but in 2009-2010 winter, each of our big snowstorms was preceded by a major snow in Iowa about 5-7 days earlier. If Iowa gets a nice snowfall this week, it may be a signal that our storm is coming about 5-7 days later. I know, this is quite a stretch, but I seem to recall that correlation in the 2009-2010 winter.

Disclaimer: I am a snow starved weenie grasping at straws here and I do not have a mathematical formula or even the time necessary to go back and find the exact dates of the Iowa snowfalls prior to each of the DC snowfalls that winter. Just a correlation I seem to recall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...