Amped Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 60s tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wonderdog Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 Feb 9 b-day storm. Book it. Maybe right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattie g Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 He is no victim. Let's get that clear before we go any further. I am just not the type of person who is just going to let bombastic statements fly. If he is right then he can stick it in my face. But if he has half assed this forecast then I want him to get the point that things need to be checked, checked and re-checked many times over before coming out with claims that his forecast will work. I don't know if any met will admit that there will ultimately be a "magic bullet" theory that will explain all weather and therefore predict it before it happens. I personally think it is impossible. And saying Wes attacked him using DonS info is the lowest of the low. I like weather and all (or else I wouldn't have 1000+ posts here), but perhaps I don't care enough about weather and the science behind it to get so worked up (and that's not a dig at those for whom weather is a real passion). I just don't like seeing people being nasty, especially in relative anonymity while sitting behind a keyboard. No doubt he's being attacked by some, and legitimately questioned by others. Wes being the latter of the two! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurtstack Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 I like weather and all (or else I wouldn't have 1000+ posts here), but perhaps I don't care enough about weather and the science behind it to get so worked up (and that's not a dig at those for whom weather is a real passion). I just don't like seeing people being nasty, especially in relative anonymity while sitting behind a keyboard. No doubt he's being attacked by some, and legitimately questioned by others. Wes being the latter of the two! I think you are right. The attacking actually makes the threads even more difficult to read than the weenie posts, because it leads to endless pointless back and forth "he said", "she said" arguments. But, I guess when the winter weather is as bad as it's been, you get the bottom of the barrel weenie post followed by 6-7 attacks, followed by 6-7 defensive posts from the original weenie. I guess it's hard for some to stay on track with the weather, when there is no significant winter weather to speak of. Typically it's the weenies who "attack" the other "weenies" and the red tags who tend to offer constructive criticism. I just see the weenie posts and attacks as pure entertainment, while others around here seem to take things far to seriously. I mean we certainly haven't had a reason to be in "storm mode" this year on the boards, and frankly I wish Ji would just go hog wild with his trolling until the weather gets fairly interesting again. That being said the 18Z GFS cries wolf again in the long range, and as gullible as I am, I'll be blindly following it for the next week.... again.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usedtobe Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 I like weather and all (or else I wouldn't have 1000+ posts here), but perhaps I don't care enough about weather and the science behind it to get so worked up (and that's not a dig at those for whom weather is a real passion). I just don't like seeing people being nasty, especially in relative anonymity while sitting behind a keyboard. No doubt he's being attacked by some, and legitimately questioned by others. Wes being the latter of the two! I'm pretty well done with the discussion. I don't see much scientific merit in his ideas though he could still end up verifying decently as none us really know what is going to happen. I'm just glad the discussion is now confined to one thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mappy Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 I like weather and all (or else I wouldn't have 1000+ posts here), but perhaps I don't care enough about weather and the science behind it to get so worked up (and that's not a dig at those for whom weather is a real passion). I just don't like seeing people being nasty, especially in relative anonymity while sitting behind a keyboard. No doubt he's being attacked by some, and legitimately questioned by others. Wes being the latter of the two! It's so easy to say this when you are anon behind your computer. But feel free to jump on the BB bandwagon. We won't judge you too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 If BB is right I'll self deport myself to easternuswx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 The 00z GFS is super cali fragilistic expisuckidocious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurtstack Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 The 00z GFS is super cali fragilistic expisuckidocious Yeah it really amps that western ridge this run and lets the fun and games begin. 0z GFS says this winter won't go out without a serious fight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted January 27, 2012 Author Share Posted January 27, 2012 New Day 1 SPC OTLK has 2% TOR for east of BR... 5% S MD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 Yeah it really amps that western ridge this run and lets the fun and games begin. 0z GFS says this winter won't go out without a serious fight. I think you missed my post. I think it gives us a chance, but Verbatim it sucks. The western ridge looks nicer at the end of the run when it gets undercut and is no longer based in the tropics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2O Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 I like weather and all (or else I wouldn't have 1000+ posts here), but perhaps I don't care enough about weather and the science behind it to get so worked up (and that's not a dig at those for whom weather is a real passion). I just don't like seeing people being nasty, especially in relative anonymity while sitting behind a keyboard. No doubt he's being attacked by some, and legitimately questioned by others. Wes being the latter of the two! You seem to be confusing "getting worked up" with asking to put up or shut up. Let's see how it all plays out before we hump BBs new math and start calling out others for being big bad meanies. I got odds that he will not want to accept that his "formula" doesnt work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattie g Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 It's so easy to say this when you are anon behind your computer. But feel free to jump on the BB bandwagon. We won't judge you too much. This makes absolutely no sense. Why am I being called out for saying that people shouldn't be nasty? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattie g Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 You seem to be confusing "getting worked up" with asking to put up or shut up. Let's see how it all plays out before we hump BBs new math and start calling out others for being big bad meanies. I got odds that he will not want to accept that his "formula" doesnt work. I don't think I am getting it confused. Some people are legitimately asking him to show some evidence. Others are just blasting him, and some are doing so while masquerading as asking for proof. I'm OK with letting it play out, and that BB will rightfully deserve to be called out if his forecast doesn't work out. Nonetheless, any such calling out should at least be done with some modicum of respectfulness. That said, I'm happy to leave this discussion now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aldie 22 Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 This makes absolutely no sense. Why am I being called out for saying that people shouldn't be nasty? Im with you on this one...in the old days we just made fun of people with humor...it seems different now...BB isnt the first one like this...eh.who cares i guess...i dont much but i guess i do a little since i posted but mostly i dont Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mappy Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 This makes absolutely no sense. Why am I being called out for saying that people shouldn't be nasty? Who has been nasty to him? I've seen no one say his formula is ridiculous, stupid, wrong, etc. People have questioned it, as it should be. Hell, even Trixie hasn't been nasty to him she has just asked him to post his formula with numerical values. Look, when Wes points out that his method has no scientific value behind it, you know something ain't right. But again, feel free to defend him and jump on his bandwagon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 Who has been nasty to him? I've seen no one say his formula is ridiculous, stupid, wrong, etc. People have questioned it, as it should be. Hell, even Trixie hasn't been nasty to him she has just asked him to post his formula with numerical values. Look, when Wes points out that his method has no scientific value behind it, you know something ain't right. But again, feel free to defend him and jump on his bandwagon. I don't care how he got there. He could have used an abacus, box of paperclips, and some duct tape.........I'm ridin the 30"+ Feb call........well, at least 3" Feb......ummm, .3"? eh, whatever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aldie 22 Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 We all think too highly of ourselves on these boards....its funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mappy Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 I don't care how he got there. He could have used an abacus, box of paperclips, and some duct tape.........I'm ridin the 30"+ Feb call........well, at least 3" Feb......ummm, .3"? eh, whatever At least you can admit you are being a weenie with his call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 At least you can admit you are being a weenie with his call. In bb's defense, he tries pretty hard. He reads a fair amount of research and comes to his own conclusions. Right or wrong, it's better than saying mark x on the calendar and bring a shovel. He likes the attention that bold calls bring and this most recent one is a piece of art. I'm a right wing weenie. I keep letting reality get in the way but hey, that's just me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mappy Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 In bb's defense, he tries pretty hard. He reads a fair amount of research and comes to his own conclusions. Right or wrong, it's better than saying mark x on the calendar and bring a shovel. He likes the attention that bold calls bring and this most recent one is a piece of art. I'm a right wing weenie. I keep letting reality get in the way but hey, that's just me. This! I agree with what HM said in that it is good for BB to try and do something new with the weather field. HOWEVER, he hasn't proved his new formula is actually correct, I want to see some values thrown in there and see how it all breaks down. But he is an attention whore to the fullest, he always has been... why would he embellish observations like he does if he didn't like the attention he gets from it? Anyone who doesn't see that is just silly - or I am just a big meanie and that's that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2O Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 In bb's defense, he tries pretty hard. He reads a fair amount of research and comes to his own conclusions. Right or wrong, it's better than saying mark x on the calendar and bring a shovel. He likes the attention that bold calls bring and this most recent one is a piece of art. I'm a right wing weenie. I keep letting reality get in the way but hey, that's just me. If BB has actually found something then it will be proven. The problem is that a lot of his premise is based on CC stuff that is questionable in itself. Again, i say that if he is right then it is a good thing that a discussion will come from it but to blindly say(not you) that we are all being meanies because we are skeptical is just wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2O Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 Im with you on this one...in the old days we just made fun of people with humor...it seems different now...BB isnt the first one like this...eh.who cares i guess...i dont much but i guess i do a little since i posted but mostly i dont I wonder if Ruggie and Chuck would think it was all funny. Give Chuck credit in that when he presented some of his stuff he had loads and loads of well accepted data that he used. We don't have much as of yet with what BB is presenting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 If BB has actually found something then it will be proven. The problem is that a lot of his premise is based on CC stuff that is questionable in itself. Again, i say that if he is right then it is a good thing that a discussion will come from it but to blindly say(not you) that we are all being meanies because we are skeptical is just wrong. Absolutely. Even if he is right I don't think I'll ever understand why but hey, I'd consider trading in one of my kids for 3' of snow next month. I mean seriously, I have 4 kids and a dog so we might not even notice one gone for a while. My defense for bb wasn't really aimed at people being big meanies because for one, it appears to me a more civilized back and forth than usualy and two, he enjoys every minute of it no matter what the tone is. I was just basically agreeing with HM and my own opinions of board content. When you add cool research papers and neat colored graphics to a post it's immediately more credible than mark your calendar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieOber Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 Im with you on this one...in the old days we just made fun of people with humor...it seems different now...BB isnt the first one like this...eh.who cares i guess...i dont much but i guess i do a little since i posted but mostly i dont You mean like when Ruggie got so mad that he left and started another board? Or when OWS Kevin Martin had to be banned due to threatening rants because people mocked him? Or when Martinsville Kevin left and spent months trashing us for being mean on his blog? Thems were the days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2O Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 Question for the BB defenders. If he came out and called for little to no snow for the rest of the winter based on this new formula would y'all have given him the time of day? My guess is no. He came in and JB'd the rest of winter and instant snow love Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2O Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 Absolutely. Even if he is right I don't think I'll ever understand why but hey, I'd consider trading in one of my kids for 3' of snow next month. I mean seriously, I have 4 kids and a dog so we might not even notice one gone for a while. My defense for bb wasn't really aimed at people being big meanies because for one, it appears to me a more civilized back and forth than usualy and two, he enjoys every minute of it no matter what the tone is. I was just basically agreeing with HM and my own opinions of board content. When you add cool research papers and neat colored graphics to a post it's immediately more credible than mark your calendar. I'm all for sound discussion and new ideas. Hell, I bought Chuck's ideas hook line and sinker when I first joined. Those didn't work out too well so lessoned learned. All i can hope for out of this would be everyone learning from the wx talk about it. that includes BB as well but i have a feeling he will defend his ideas regardless of how wrong(or right) they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aldie 22 Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 You mean like when Ruggie got so mad that he left and started another board? Or when OWS Kevin Martin had to be banned due to threatening rants because people mocked him? Or when Martinsville Kevin left and spent months trashing us for being mean on his blog? Thems were the days. Exactly....and all we did was make fun....fun being the key word...seriously if BB was able to back up his ideas with some serious science....how many of us would really know...this is some funny s hit and I honestly am wondering if it's all a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aldie 22 Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 Question for the BB defenders. If he came out and called for little to no snow for the rest of the winter based on this new formula would y'all have given him the time of day? My guess is no. He came in and JB'd the rest of winter and instant snow love I'm trying to figure out who is defending him....i'm calling for us to make fun of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mappy Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 I'm trying to figure out who is defending him....i'm calling for us to make fun of him. Your first post seemed as if you were defending him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.