Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Snow potential Thursday night and Saturday 1/19 to 1/21


Mikehobbyst

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 858
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Dude the plot is snow regardless of the thickneses. Warmest level is surface a smidge above 0 and there is room to wet bulb.

It's mid January it snows even with your thickness with a sounding like that.

I agree with Trials on this one... The critical thickness in that lower layer, while somewhat borderline-ish, still leans towards likely frozen precip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have followed my posts, I always mention to look at the actual skew-t sounding and not those raw text outputs. Im agreeing with you man!

soundings are really the best way in determining precip type with thicknesses acting as a good rough guideline. Soundings are also a great way at looking at the strength of low-mid-level warm advection by analyzing the strength of the veering pattern of wind with height. I prefer this method as opposed to the more traditional method of looking at where height contours cross isotherms. Soundings are also good in determining saturation in the snow growth layer so long as you also take into account that there is good omega happening within that region as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

same sh-t different year...my post got deleted...unreal

It won't be the same this year because I have no tolerance for it. You're clogging up the threads with horse sh*t as usual. If you have a question, ask it in a normal manner. If you disagree, do it professionally. Your tone is condescending and it leads to arguments that we don't need to have. That's the last thing I'll say about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Trials on this one... The critical thickness in that lower layer, while somewhat borderline-ish, still leans towards likely frozen precip.

he said its all snow..I simply pointed him to the bottom left which showed a r/s mix with a slant towards snow. in this winter, id error on the side of caution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

soundings are really the best way in determining precip type with thicknesses acting as a good rough guideline. Soundings are also a great way at looking at the strength of low-mid-level warm advection by analyzing the strength of the veering pattern of wind with height. I prefer this method as opposed to the more traditional method of looking at where height contours cross isotherms. Soundings are also good in determining saturation in the snow growth layer so long as you also take into account that there is good omega happening within that region as well.

all of this plus an !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can see there are differences between the GFS and the GGEM/Euro and other globals when you compare them side by side. The GFS is de-amplified while the GGEM (which we can use here for the sake of comparison) has a much more consolidated surface low back to the west. This is a generally unfavorable shortwave and surface low positioning for our area.

GGEM: http://www.meteo.psu...AST_12z/f78.gif

GFS: http://www.meteo.psu...AST_12z/f78.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wunderground maps have 2"-3" for NYC and west and also the north shore of LI has 2" or so.

The ocean facing areas get less then 1".

Northern and western suburbs get 4"+.

Lovely. :axe:

I'll be praying throughout this event or lack-thereof that we avoid the south winds. Even last winter those killed us from time to time when coastal fronts would barely pass over us and wreck the snowcover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...