Jump to content

Snow potential Thursday night and Saturday 1/19 to 1/21


Mikehobbyst

Recommended Posts

  On 1/18/2012 at 6:01 PM, earthlight said:

No..they did...they were screaming for sleet.

Only Steve d. And Jb didn't see it.

That storm never had a chance with 850 low in Ohio. Of course Upton blew the low level cold and had flood watches up. N winds at surface on 2/14 with a 1040 HP its not raining

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 858
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 1/18/2012 at 5:58 PM, TheTrials said:

Dude the plot is snow regardless of the thickneses. Warmest level is surface a smidge above 0 and there is room to wet bulb.

It's mid January it snows even with your thickness with a sounding like that.

I agree with Trials on this one... The critical thickness in that lower layer, while somewhat borderline-ish, still leans towards likely frozen precip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/18/2012 at 6:07 PM, SBUWX23 said:

If you have followed my posts, I always mention to look at the actual skew-t sounding and not those raw text outputs. Im agreeing with you man!

soundings are really the best way in determining precip type with thicknesses acting as a good rough guideline. Soundings are also a great way at looking at the strength of low-mid-level warm advection by analyzing the strength of the veering pattern of wind with height. I prefer this method as opposed to the more traditional method of looking at where height contours cross isotherms. Soundings are also good in determining saturation in the snow growth layer so long as you also take into account that there is good omega happening within that region as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/18/2012 at 6:12 PM, ace0927 said:

same sh-t different year...my post got deleted...unreal

It won't be the same this year because I have no tolerance for it. You're clogging up the threads with horse sh*t as usual. If you have a question, ask it in a normal manner. If you disagree, do it professionally. Your tone is condescending and it leads to arguments that we don't need to have. That's the last thing I'll say about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/18/2012 at 6:04 PM, tornadojay said:

I agree with Trials on this one... The critical thickness in that lower layer, while somewhat borderline-ish, still leans towards likely frozen precip.

he said its all snow..I simply pointed him to the bottom left which showed a r/s mix with a slant towards snow. in this winter, id error on the side of caution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/18/2012 at 6:07 PM, SBUWX23 said:

If you have followed my posts, I always mention to look at the actual skew-t sounding and not those raw text outputs. Im agreeing with you man!

I know you are, I appreciate it, i was just SMH that I was being called out when soundings are my thing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/18/2012 at 6:11 PM, tornadojay said:

soundings are really the best way in determining precip type with thicknesses acting as a good rough guideline. Soundings are also a great way at looking at the strength of low-mid-level warm advection by analyzing the strength of the veering pattern of wind with height. I prefer this method as opposed to the more traditional method of looking at where height contours cross isotherms. Soundings are also good in determining saturation in the snow growth layer so long as you also take into account that there is good omega happening within that region as well.

all of this plus an !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/18/2012 at 6:15 PM, ace0927 said:

he said its all snow..I simply pointed him to the bottom left which showed a r/s mix with a slant towards snow. in this winter, id error on the side of caution.

I gotcha man, just don't do it in such an argumentative way. Then, it can actually lead to constructive discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/18/2012 at 6:30 PM, tmagan said:

Checking the buoys, water temperatures are still in the upper 40's.

Sandy Hook buoy is 38.8

Western LI sound buoys and NYC harbor buoys are all 37-39 degrees. Eastern LI sound buoys 39-42.

The offshore buoys are in the mid and upper 40's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can see there are differences between the GFS and the GGEM/Euro and other globals when you compare them side by side. The GFS is de-amplified while the GGEM (which we can use here for the sake of comparison) has a much more consolidated surface low back to the west. This is a generally unfavorable shortwave and surface low positioning for our area.

GGEM: http://www.meteo.psu...AST_12z/f78.gif

GFS: http://www.meteo.psu...AST_12z/f78.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/18/2012 at 6:34 PM, Plfdwxdude said:

It's funny too because you never hear the opposite. Nobody sees a golf ball size hailstone and says oh its sleeting out...

Your assuming the average Joe knows the difference between hail and sleet. Alot of people are not aware of the differences and could care less to boot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/18/2012 at 6:24 PM, ag3 said:

wunderground maps have 2"-3" for NYC and west and also the north shore of LI has 2" or so.

The ocean facing areas get less then 1".

Northern and western suburbs get 4"+.

Lovely. :axe:

I'll be praying throughout this event or lack-thereof that we avoid the south winds. Even last winter those killed us from time to time when coastal fronts would barely pass over us and wreck the snowcover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...