Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Mid January Discussion


earthlight

Recommended Posts

Yeah we've seen Saturday's forecast go from low 40s to now near 50 and it wouldn't surprise me if Sunday is pretty close to that. Like 3 Saturdays ago when places got into the 60s and forecasts busted by 5 to 10 degrees.

Yep, just a couple days ago Sunday and Monday were supposed to be in the mid/upper 30s. Now it looks like we just might barely drop below freezing one of those nights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Yeah we've seen Saturday's forecast go from low 40s to now near 50 and it wouldn't surprise me if Sunday is pretty close to that. Like 3 Saturdays ago when places got into the 60s and forecasts busted by 5 to 10 degrees.

NAM has highs of 42-44 for tomorrow.

40-42 for Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 6z GFS had alot of good feautres, especially towards the end of the run. Massive PNA ridge out west, PV over eastern Canada. Overall there seems to be pretty good model consensus on a PNA ridge. Too bad its still a neutral NAO at best, even on the ECMWF. All the really cold air is stuck up by Greenland.

test8.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would it change? If anything, the models have been too fast with pattern changes, at this range.

Because at that distance there are often changes. You really think a 168 hour forecast in winter is set in stone? It's a different type of storm, but our one snow event was supposed to be rain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because at that distance there are often changes. You really think a 168 hour forecast in winter is set in stone? It's a different type of storm, but our one snow event was supposed to be rain.

Of course, nothing is set is stone. But based on what scientific reason, do you thing the models would be wrong? What would they be faster bring in the pattern change, if they have been too fast in the past?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course, nothing is set is stone. But based on what scientific reason, do you thing the models would be wrong? What would they be faster bring in the pattern change, if they have been too fast in the past?

We've seen +PNAs this winter, but never timed correctly. Things are at least more favorable than they were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...