Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,608
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Atlantic Tropical Action 2012 - Part I


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Its the place to discuss anything related to the tropics correct..? Anything that long range in any model carries poor skill which is perfectly understood.

I mean, yes, of course. But every year I struggle to see the point of posting something that everyone agrees has little to no value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's ok being it the start of the season. It becomes even more pointless and annoying by late August where every single run of your favorite model shows a hurricane past day 10.

Exactly. We're in this typical dead period with little or nothing to talk about and before you know it we will have 'season cancel' posts.

300+ charts are harmless until as you said later in the season when every run will show something.

With that said I'll never give up my sub 900 HWRF graphics. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. We're in this typical dead period with little or nothing to talk about and before you know it we will have 'season cancel' posts.

300+ charts are harmless until as you said later in the season when every run will show something.

With that said I'll never give up my sub 900 HWRF graphics. :)

That being said, the NAM should be verboten if it differs from any other model, no matter the time range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That being said, the NAM should be verboten if it differs from any other model, no matter the time range.

Only 4 years ago the NAM and CMC saw what become barely Tropical Storm Edouard forming a run or two before the big boys, the GFS and Euro. And I remember a local forum pro-met suggest I was a weenie for posting a post-truncation off hour GFS run showing snow in Houston in December 2008. I think we all know what happened there.

Wondering if NAM might be ok for non-tropical origin development if polar low or old front is coming from well within the domain. Resolution is good, I don't know enough about model physics, (or different physics packages, I have no clue how the ARW works, for example) but what prevents the NAM from being semi-accurate on development from non-tropical sources that start well inside the domain?

You want controversy- I remain as convinced as ever that heat potential maps are over-rated for storms moving with alacrity, and only crawlers like Mitch or Wilma off Mexico actually benefit from high heat potential. Unless some warm eddy had broken off the loop current and was right offshore Texas, there would seem no way that 1900 or 1915 could have happened. Yet they did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its the place to discuss anything related to the tropics correct..? Anything that long range in any model carries poor skill which is perfectly understood.

We all should have a good idea of the pitfalls of using deterministic guidance, but there is some value in looking at the ensemble spread to give an idea of the overall uncertainty. Lets look at the 234 hour ensemble plot showing both 700 hPa heights and vorticity with the height uncertainty shaded.

2lbyotw.png

Note that we see with the relative area of lower heights in the East Pacific where there is high uncertainty in the 700 hPa height values. This is mainly related to the overall intensity of the features (several of the individual members are depicting a significantly stronger TC than a broad low pressure area). Compare that to the relatively low uncertainty associated with the other broad 700 hPa low over the Western Caribbean and Yucatan Peninsula. This means that the models are mostly in agreement with the intensity (a weak low, probably not a TC). Note that the maximum error is not centered over the closed height line, which indicates the largest uncertainty is possibly related to the position of the feature (with some members further out into the Bahamas perhaps). Note the overall pattern as well, which you can infer much better in the long range than the typical fickleness of sub-synoptic scale features such as TCs. The ridge in the east could probably be forecasted with relative confidence, while the trough in the west is much more of a wildcard, as the position is highly uncertain (note how the height spread increases on the edges of the mean trough position over California).

So based on a quick look at the ensembles, are take home points should be.

1. Two weak lows, one in the EPAC basin and another in the ATL basin, although the EPAC low has uncertainty skewed towards a stronger TC.

2. The ATL low uncertainty is due to positional error and not intensity.

3. The longwave pattern suggests a ridge over the Eastern United States with relatively low uncertainty, but the position of the West Coast trough is highly uncertain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if you have time, but the Albany team is putting a lot of good products and I, at least, would benefit from having a sort of a webpage FAQ for the products that you guys are outputting. I know Paul's site and your site, but I haven't spent enough time with anything except Paul's forecasts to help with my operational TCG forecasts.

If you message me a list of questions that you think people might have, I can make that happen!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see data came in from a flight over the northern Gulf of Mexico, was this a training flight or was it sent out on an investigate?

Could be training...I see some training data from the other day plus a dropsonde near Puerto Rico yesterday...then some aircraft recon obs stretching from Puerto Rico to the Gulf today. Could be just taking obs on the transit back to CONUS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be training...I see some training data from the other day plus a dropsonde near Puerto Rico yesterday...then some aircraft recon obs stretching from Puerto Rico to the Gulf today. Could be just taking obs on the transit back to CONUS.

Training missions are on the up tick with staff arriving for summer deployment. I had a lengthy conversation with a friend that is a pilot for the 53rd RECON Group yesterday at a gathering and he departs in two weeks for his training flights before deploying during the month of August.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking ahead to next weekend in the longer range, a broad area of low pressure is suggested across the W Caribbean and possibly the Bay of Campeche as heights fall and lowering pressures increase from the EPAC on E into the Western North Atlantic Basin. The monsoonal trough looks to start lifting N from Central America and these features were noted the HPC this morning.

ACROSS THE TROPICS...MID-LEVEL HEIGHTS BECOME LOW ENOUGH BETWEEN

BERMUDA AND THE SOUTHEAST COAST TO INDUCE A BROAD SURFACE LOW/AREA

OF DISTURBED WEATHER IN THE WESTERN CARIBBEAN FROM THIS WEEKEND

ONWARD. RIDGING ACROSS NORTHERN MEXICO BRINGS THE PROMISE OF

RENEWED TROPICAL ACTIVITY SOUTH OF MEXICO ACROSS THE TROPICAL

PACIFIC OVER THE NEXT WEEK...WITH THE 12Z GLOBAL ENSEMBLE MEMBERS

INDICATING THREE PROSPECTS FOR DEVELOPMENT. SEE NATIONAL

HURRICANE CENTER /NHC/ TROPICAL WEATHER OUTLOOKS CONCERNING THE

FIRST OF THESE AREAS CURRENTLY WELL SOUTH OF BAJA CALIFORNIA.

post-32-0-25572100-1339419804_thumb.gif

post-32-0-15300300-1339419815_thumb.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My master's thesis is actually on these types of systems and I did a poster back at the tropical AMS conference (if you are interested, I have a link on my website with more information). One of key factors that will be interesting to look for is the development of persistant low-level westerly flow across the East Pacific in the next week. A convectively coupled kelvin wave is already making its way across the East Pacific as we speed, which is already setting the table as a westerly wind burst (WWB) will follow in its wake. The ITCZ is also forecasted to shift northward and move over Central America, which is also another characteristic of these types of disturbances. Still a lot of time to watch this evolve, but these types of circulations have the potential to be catastrophic rain makers across Central America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...