Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

What if...we got a late March/April Bookend


HoarfrostHubb

Recommended Posts

That was more or less what 1996-1997 was here....26.3" on Dec 6-7 and then 33" on Mar 31-Apr 1...there were some assorted small events in between...but really, December after the Cantore storm was pathetic and Jan/Feb combined for 13" of snow which is awful. March actually had decent snow before the blizzard...but essentially the meat of that winter was horrendous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well???

Gun to head... would you pick 3 months of blah if you could get a 36"er?

October...20-30" of snow....nothing (basically) Nov-March then 3 feet in 1 day

No, not if I could get a steady diet of moderate snowfalls and a normal, sustainable snowpack. It's a ridiculous question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not worth it IMO.... Love a big storm in April, but it melts right off..cheap thrill. The only April storm I ever saw that actually stuck around in sub freezing wx for several, days was 4/6/82 - a much more anomalous storm than '97 because of the arctic air involved.

1996/97 was an utter fail in ENY. I don't think we got anywhere near as much in the Cantore storm and the valley only got about 8 sloppy inches on 4/1. The Catskills did get three feet.

That was more or less what 1996-1997 was here....26.3" on Dec 6-7 and then 33" on Mar 31-Apr 1...there were some assorted small events in between...but really, December after the Cantore storm was pathetic and Jan/Feb combined for 13" of snow which is awful. March actually had decent snow before the blizzard...but essentially the meat of that winter was horrendous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nickel and dime winters are a dime a dozen...they happen all the time. I'd take an anomalous 3 foot storm and sacrifice the snow pack for it. They are rare and about the most exciting weather event for me to track personally.

For those who ski 85 days per year or snow mobile, I could def understand taking the 3-6" snowfalls all winter vs a huge 30-40" storm...but for me, no way and its not a hard call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nickel and dime winters are a dime a dozen...they happen all the time. I'd take an anomalous 3 foot storm and sacrifice the snow pack for it. They are rare and about the most exciting weather event for me to track personally.

For those who ski 85 days per year or snow mobile, I could def understand taking the 3-6" snowfalls all winter vs a huge 30-40" storm...but for me, no way and its not a hard call.

Exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

No, I prefer a never ending series of major winter storms. However, a typical sustained snowpack is better than a Winter bookended by major storms.

right and i think most people here would take one 4-8 storm a week every week......who don't do winter sports.....and they would enjoy the continuous snow pack and continous moderate snowfalls

wether someone would take a 36 inch snow storm in april 1 if you had to accept 3 future months (DJF) where it didn't snow at all l. well you can't now honestly decide that because it's mid feb (unless you are saying you would take a 36 incher in april) and then your willing to forgoe (DJF) snowfall next year?

i guess it is difficult in the mind to weigh /understand the time of stink your enduring without some effort. i'm mean you'd willingly be in agony 90 consecutive days of suck snow and miseree conditions that you agreed to in exchange for 1 day of memorable snow. that melts in 3 days. yes everyone loves a snow storm of that magnitude. but would you agree to it now in exchange for 3 suck months of snow next year? didn't think so

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...