Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

12/7-12/8 Potential Event Discussion Part II


earthlight

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 388
  • Created
  • Last Reply

This run may be better for Northern New Jersey and Southeast New York..just glancing at the 30 hour panel compared to the 36 hour panel on the 18z run. It's shifted the 850mb low and 0c line east by 25 or more miles. The deformation band is also farther east. Looking back..this trend has been ongoing for the last three to four model cycles on the NAM. Notice how the deformation band is now actually located over Northeast New Jersey at 30 hours.

f30.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To illustrate...here are the 850mb temperatures at 35 hours on the 18z run and 29 hours on the 00z run. You can see the NAM is now picking up on an area of dynamic cooling over heavy precipitation in Northeast New Jersey.

18z

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/NAMSFC4_18z/t85w35.gif

00z

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/NAMSFC4_0z/t85w29.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To illustrate...here are the 850mb temperatures at 35 hours on the 18z run and 29 hours on the 00z run. You can see the NAM is now picking up on an area of dynamic cooling over heavy precipitation in Northeast New Jersey.

18z

http://www.meteo.psu..._18z/t85w35.gif

00z

http://www.meteo.psu...4_0z/t85w29.gif

700mb panel with the 284 line so far north and west says to me that's probably not enough, even though the 850's are cooling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

700mb panel with the 284 line so far north and west says to me that's probably not enough, even though the 850's are cooling.

It's something..small improvement that probably doesn't mean much in the end. But at this range, I guess it's worth looking at for any extra snow some people might be able to get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To illustrate...here are the 850mb temperatures at 35 hours on the 18z run and 29 hours on the 00z run. You can see the NAM is now picking up on an area of dynamic cooling over heavy precipitation in Northeast New Jersey.

18z

http://www.meteo.psu..._18z/t85w35.gif

00z

http://www.meteo.psu...4_0z/t85w29.gif

Another 25 MI E and :weenie:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

700mb panel with the 284 line so far north and west says to me that's probably not enough, even though the 850's are cooling.

Agreed, the WAA seems to be too strong at all levels and without a cold antecedent airmass, its not even going to be close.

Like I said when this was modeled to go OTS, a AO around +5 will only encourage this to come inland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice maps NJWinter23 and eartlight... this is looking ugly, with no hope of falling under the deformation band I guess NYC's second best hope other than back end flakes is for dry slotting to keep us from getting those 2-3 inches of rain modeled...

The model performance wasn't good concerning how they handled the H5 set up for this storm; just over the last 2 days, there were constant changes with the H5 set up until the very last minute; for Wednesday's set up, I couldn't find any 2 consecutive frames showing the same situation. Yesterday's 12z NAM and today's 18z NAM attached below clearly show these differences, and with the initialized set up for today different than what yesterday's runs showed, there's no hope of this going back to yesterday's 18z NAM. Hopefully the model performance for this storm isn't a preview of what's to come this winter...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like your snowfall edge line is almost exactly where it was during the October event, yes?

AERONET_CCNY.2011303.terra.500m.jpg

Great sat pic. Amazing how MBY in Monmouth is just barely inside that eastern boundary. Sharp cut off. Also interesting to note how northern Holmdel received less than Colts Neck, due to warm influence from the bay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The silver lining here is at least we have a classic nor'easter, albeit a rainstorm for NYC. Anyone up for a trip to the Poconos to see the snow up front and personal?

Agree-I was worried about the dryness and general lack of storms in Nov...hopefully with an more active pattern we can get something to deliver for us...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KORH, worcester mass, even has issues, as it cools they dry up where the ice crystals form.

if it's not one thing, its another.

Go to Central VT for the jackpot.

Lack of heavy deform band ruins ORH and SNE this run. 18z had a very strong band over that area. 0z took it away, thus no dynamics to cool them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NAM BUFKIT is still printing out 2 inches for New Brunswick and has been for a while now. We will see... falls from 06Z-08Z Thursday. Deep layer omega from near the surface up through 400 hPa. Winds should be pretty gusty at the surface, too. 50 kts at the bottom of the inversion layer. Unfortunately, as has been said, it is only for about an hour or so as the mid-levels dry out in the snow growth region quite quickly by the time it becomes [marginally] cold enough to snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great sat pic. Amazing how MBY in Monmouth is just barely inside that eastern boundary. Sharp cut off. Also interesting to note how northern Holmdel received less than Colts Neck, due to warm influence from the bay

Zoom in and take a look at my little patch of NE Queens. The sound ruined it for us I assume since the winds were blowing right off that still relatively warm water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...