Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Thursday Wintry Threat II


Baroclinic Zone

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Big shift from your normal attitude. I still think you are in the game if the temps can cool quick enough. You have a legit chance of having the ground at least white. Even the EURO hits you with a few inches on the backside.

It's over..who cares about a coating that will melt by noon. If I don't get at least 2-4 inches it's a failure. SREFS are NW..Euro will come NW again . You'll end up with a foot of snow. Congrats

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude it's over. I am not going to see a flake of snow. This is wire to wire to rain 95% of SNE. The Euro isn't done coming NW yet. When I saw the GEFS have some amped solutions last nite I knew we were cooked. This is over.

Totally agree. Cold miserable rain is coming in. except for those to our North and west with some latitude and elevation. Most of us might end as some crappy flakes but that is all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not suicidal, I'm just being realistic . Why would we expect anything to go our way??. This winter is going to go down as one of the top 5 worst. Now that I've admitted it, it's easier to be realistic.

:lol:

stop. that's ridiculous. it could blow from start to finish or it could turn on a dime.

enjoy the weather, it's the only weather ya got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Southwest flow + no blocking equals NW trend. This could get a bit more amped up though too. Also I think people have been missing the significant banding possible to the NW of the storm. There will probably be a very narrow stripe of 5 up to 10" with little to nothing on either side

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't worry...according to skierinvermont, it's silly to fear the NW trend because no guidance showed a NNE hit 84 hours out.

ummm what? where did this come from? do we have a problem? I never said anything like that.

all I said was I haven't had time to check the models and didn't realize this was a legit threat until I looked more in depth. Yikes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Southwest flow + no blocking equals NW trend. This could get a bit more amped up though too. Also I think people have been missing the significant banding possible to the NW of the storm. There will probably be a very narrow stripe of 5 up to 10" with little to nothing on either side

We talked about that all day yesterday...lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Southwest flow + no blocking equals NW trend. This could get a bit more amped up though too. Also I think people have been missing the significant banding possible to the NW of the storm. There will probably be a very narrow stripe of 5 up to 10" with little to nothing on either side

yeah scooter and i made some references to that yesterday. definitely some signals there.

someone should get hit pretty good...probably powderfreak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ummm what? where did this come from? do we have a problem? I never said anything like that.

all I said was I haven't had time to check the models and didn't realize this was a legit threat until I looked more in depth. Yikes.

It has become more legit, The foothills and mtns good do well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EC ens are amped up like the op. I'm probably in a brief RA to +SN scenario as of now, but these 6-12hrly jumps NW are pretty large and there's no sign of stopping yet.

Apologies to snownh for getting on him about trolling SNE with a NW trend days ago....although the trolling was wrong it ended up verifying that way. That was when the s/w was modeled by everything to be flat as a board when it reached our region though. Obviously that will not be the case. :lol:

Yea, well.....modelology dictated that this would not tuck inland....meterology implied that it very well may.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ummm what? where did this come from? do we have a problem? I never said anything like that.

all I said was I haven't had time to check the models and didn't realize this was a legit threat until I looked more in depth. Yikes.

Maybe it was powderfreak....my apologies if so, but it was one of you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realized two days ago once I actually looked at the models this was a legitimate threat to track for NNE and said so publicly but apparently some people need a scapegoat.

Needing a scapegoat would imply that I thought that the weather could be controled.

I simply mixed you up with powderfreak.

I wasn't really invested in this because I knew it would likely go to $hit....NBD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ummm what? where did this come from? do we have a problem? I never said anything like that.

all I said was I haven't had time to check the models and didn't realize this was a legit threat until I looked more in depth. Yikes.

I'm pretty sure he had me confused with you...

Its more a semantics issue too, because I was more implying that a NW trend far enough to really hit NNE (Central/Northern Greens, Whites, up towards Rangley) seemed very unlikely and still does.

It has shifted NW though to western SNE and central New England's delight. Not enough for me, but just enough to botch it for the coastal plain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...