Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Potential 12/8 Event Discussion Part I


earthlight

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 540
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Can anyone help me figure out what's happening in this time frame? Unfortunately I'm having a lot of problems with my computer and other things and haven't had a chance to check the weather until now, and I'm completely clueless on this time frame seeing the GFS show a snowstorm, ECM just offshore, NAM with rain, CMC with nothing, ect...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FOR OUR AREA...NORTHERN STREAM TROUGH MOVES ACROSS THE NORTHEAST BY

WED. THIS TROUGH MOVES WELL TO THE NORTHEAST AS SW TROUGH/LOW

FINALLY MAKES ITS WAY ACROSS THE MID WEST AND TOWARD THE EAST COAST

BY THURSDAY OR FRIDAY...WEAKENING AS IT DOES SO. GFS CONTINUES TO BE

A SLOWER AND MORE AMPLIFIED OUTLIER...SO IT/S SOLUTION NOT FOLLOWED

HERE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NAM at 51 hrs has a 150kt SSW jet streak over Eastern OK.

Usually not a good sign to get frozen precipitation into our area.

nor is a HP moving off the east coast with a return flow torching the lower levels, but hey, the nogaps looks good, if you correct for all its 1 million biases

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why they havent posted watches yet.

In all seriousness, you could actually sneak one in here. How has the guidance been so far for ORH?

for Will, yes, not us

and I don't consider march 2009 a sneak. It had a great PNA ridge with deep cold air being reinforced and a cutoff 500mb low over the south.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for Will, yes, not us

and I don't consider march 2009 and sneak. It has a great PNA ridge with deep cold air being reinforced and a cutoff 500mb low over the south.

End of winter too...wavelengths really shorten as you get into March...classic March cutoff low riding up the PJ. It wasn';t ideal, but its far easier to do in March than Dec/Jan/Feb.

This current threat IMHO looks like dung for even ORH...so that tells you my opinion on it. There's an outside chance, but it will be very lucky if it happens. Its worth watching since there hasn't been crap to watch in weeks, but I do not find a reason to get too analytical over it until it keeps showing a possible hit at inside of 84 hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

End of winter too...wavelengths really shorten as you get into March...classic March cutoff low riding up the PJ. It wasn';t ideal, but its far easier to do in March than Dec/Jan/Feb.

This current threat IMHO looks like dung for even ORH...so that tells you my opinion on it. There's an outside chance, but it will be very lucky if it happens. Its worth watching since there hasn't been crap to watch in weeks, but I do not find a reason to get too analytical over it until it keeps showing a possible hit at inside of 84 hours.

yah, the wavelengths helped, but it was barely march, I think we could have done it earlier in the season too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yah, the wavelengths helped, but it was barely march, I think we could have done it earlier in the season too.

Very questionable...maybe mid Feb or early Dec (but the lack of cold then would have killed you...since almost the same thing happened on 12/12/08)...but yeah, its not a classic setup in mid winter.

People love to come up with exceptions to villify any forecast of warmth and snow which is fine...if the poster is getting too overwhelming with that attitude...but sometimes its ok to accept that the pattern just cannot produce. Since the pattern has been so bad, its fine to follow this "threat"...its better than zero threat, but not by a whole lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's too bad we have no cold in the antecedent airmass...the surface low looks to be going off the M/A coast south of Long Island on this run

http://www.meteo.psu...EAST_0z/f84.gif

NAM would probably be huge snow here at the elevations...wish I could take it seriously. But the PV is going to put this through a meat grinder most likely. If it doesn't...very high risk of west storm. Its literally trying to roll snake eyes playing craps. Hopefully it happens...but its hard to get optimistic without a blocking feature that buoys our errors in track...thats why blocking is so nice...it takes a much stronger difference in solutions to change the chances of snow...they like to reject height rises when it tries to get stronger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Will said,  I guess it's cool that there's something to track. But this system has very little chance of bringing snow to anybody in this area that doesn't have good elevation.

The NAM got colder since 18z, so that's something positive. I hope at least part of your area can see snow. It will be fun to track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...