Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,589
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

FAILDC#


Ji

Recommended Posts

your profile says 60 degrees. Way to warm for snow..plus hot roads...terrible sun angle....bad pattern...hostile per ORH...not happening

i hope Wes is really down on January.. might mean we get a hecs :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Think 10/29 redux, only the temps and QPF line up a bit better for the changeover on the back-end:

20111207-08_MAsnowInitial.png

The upper-level vort. max is potent enough to create an area of strong dynamics along the back edge of the system, which will pull cooler air down to the surface and make it cool enough within the boundary layer for some accumulation as the coastal low forms and tracks northeastward. Some banding will allow for locally higher totals along the axis that has the greatest snowfall through the WV/VA mountains, south-central and eastern PA and northern NJ.

I took the 12z Euro Op. solution and shifted the low center northwestward to account for for some model biases, which actually lines up fairly well with the 18z NAM after that adjustment. I believe the 12z and now 18z GFS solutions are too suppressed with this system given how strong the vort. max is.

The snowfall totals could go up as the storm's track and QPF amounts get honed in on the models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would sacrifice Ian's right arm for a 1032 high in Quebec on Wednesday.

im a lefty.. i'd deal.

I would tell you what i would sacrifice of Ian's but Midlo will just delete it so i won't.

my nonsense posting is better than yours. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think 10/29 redux, only the temps and QPF line up a bit better for the changeover on the back-end:

20111207-08_MAsnowInitial.png

The upper-level vort. max is potent enough to create an area of strong dynamics along the back edge of the system, which will pull cooler air down to the surface and make it cool enough within the boundary layer for some accumulation as the coastal low forms and tracks northeastward. Some banding will allow for locally higher totals along the axis that has the greatest snowfall through the WV/VA mountains, south-central and eastern PA and northern NJ.

I took the 12z Euro Op. solution and shifted the low center northwestward to account for for some model biases, which actually lines up fairly well with the 18z NAM after that adjustment. I believe the 12z and now 18z GFS solutions are too suppressed with this system given how strong the vort. max is.

The snowfall totals could go up as the storm's track and QPF amounts get honed in on the models.

for where we are now hard not to agree. i've liked the idea of snow since early y-day at least (not sure i was really paying attention prior) in pretty much the same general area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, about a .25" more qpf than 12Z, but I'll reserve final judgment after I look at the soundings

the NCEP Maps are a disaster...nothing works...ive seen maps images on the 4 panel where the first 2 panels are from yesterday and the bottom 2 panels are from today...you click next to see the same hour and you get maps that you didnt even choose.

What a joke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think 10/29 redux, only the temps and QPF line up a bit better for the changeover on the back-end:

20111207-08_MAsnowInitial.png

The upper-level vort. max is potent enough to create an area of strong dynamics along the back edge of the system, which will pull cooler air down to the surface and make it cool enough within the boundary layer for some accumulation as the coastal low forms and tracks northeastward. Some banding will allow for locally higher totals along the axis that has the greatest snowfall through the WV/VA mountains, south-central and eastern PA and northern NJ.

I took the 12z Euro Op. solution and shifted the low center northwestward to account for for some model biases, which actually lines up fairly well with the 18z NAM after that adjustment. I believe the 12z and now 18z GFS solutions are too suppressed with this system given how strong the vort. max is.

The snowfall totals could go up as the storm's track and QPF amounts get honed in on the models.

those numbers will work out to the north of DCA/BWI, but only if the heavy precip shield expands that far

seems like only the NAM shows anything close to allowing that to happen (at least at this time) so I'm guessing you are figuring on a north trend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think 10/29 redux, only the temps and QPF line up a bit better for the changeover on the back-end:

20111207-08_MAsnowInitial.png

The upper-level vort. max is potent enough to create an area of strong dynamics along the back edge of the system, which will pull cooler air down to the surface and make it cool enough within the boundary layer for some accumulation as the coastal low forms and tracks northeastward. Some banding will allow for locally higher totals along the axis that has the greatest snowfall through the WV/VA mountains, south-central and eastern PA and northern NJ.

I took the 12z Euro Op. solution and shifted the low center northwestward to account for for some model biases, which actually lines up fairly well with the 18z NAM after that adjustment. I believe the 12z and now 18z GFS solutions are too suppressed with this system given how strong the vort. max is.

The snowfall totals could go up as the storm's track and QPF amounts get honed in on the models.

Looks pretty good, like mitch said I guess you're thinking a bit north, I feel a blend of them is likely. Bmore on border of 1-2/2-4, pretty cool. Nice forecast and good reasoning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for where we are now hard not to agree. i've liked the idea of snow since early y-day at least (not sure i was really paying attention prior) in pretty much the same general area.

Potential's definitely been there, but it was too borderline looking up until yesterday. Glad to see it (apparently) pan out.

those numbers will work out to the north of DCA/BWI, but only if the heavy precip shield expands that far

seems like only the NAM shows anything close to allowing that to happen (at least at this time) so I'm guessing you are figuring on a north trend

Looks pretty good, like mitch said I guess you're thinking a bit north, I feel a blend of them is likely. Bmore on border of 1-2/2-4, pretty cool. Nice forecast and good reasoning.

I think the NAM track is a fairly good call at this point (the surface low, not necessarily the QPF). Euro's close and should trend NW a bit as we get closer. GFS track is silly. I'm worried I might have to shift/expand the axis more to the north in PA/NJ, but we'll see what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are still problems with the boundary layer on the GFS, look at the 09Z zero line, it's pretty far west. That's going to be the big issue. It's sad that we essentially have the same issue as in late October. Blame the pattern.

it really is pretty pathetic

both 10/29 and this one have been driven by the strong upper level patterns vs. baroclinic boundary (if I'm saying that correctly, but you know what I mean)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Potential's definitely been there, but it was too borderline looking up until yesterday. Glad to see it (apparently) pan out.

I think the NAM track is a fairly good call at this point (the surface low, not necessarily the QPF). Euro's close and should trend NW a bit as we get closer. GFS track is silly. I'm worried I might have to shift the axis more to the north in PA/NJ, but we'll see what happens.

Heck I didn;t even notice the GFS track and assumed it was OK, I'm sure more suppressed than the other models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it really is pretty pathetic

both 10/29 and this one have been driven by the strong upper level patterns vs. baroclinic boundary (if I'm saying that correctly, but you know what I mean)

But then we had a weakly negative nao, now we don't which is why we still have borderline temps. In October it was climo, now it's the pattern. Still, it's something to watch and I get to do another article tomorrow. Life is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the peril when a normal December's snowfall is just a couple inches. Only takes one storm amidst an otherwise unfavorable pattern to get above normal. Easier to make those statements in January and February when you can get a couple accumulating snow events and still end up below normal snowfall.

That's the folly of creating and verifying forecasts based on "above normal" or "below normal" metrics. One big snowstorm can put a month and sometimes a season above normal. Heck, a few hours of high ratio powder can give the numerical impression of a banner year. Maybe frequency of snowfall should carry more weight than accumulation when discussion longer range forecasts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also it doesn't help we have a Bermuda High off the coast. I still think a good amount of people will see a transition to snow with this though. We gotta keep watching this of course. I think there will be a little bit more accumulation south than what we saw in October. Like where I live in Prince William, I think we'll see more snow than October.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...