Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

OK / AR / KS / MO Winter 2013-2014


okie333

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I guess this was an AR and E OK storm all along. Just a lot of variation and noise along the way as usual. The frustrating thing is if it were sitting right on us 5 days out it would without a doubt trend NW when we dont need it to. When we need a shift we can't get it. That threading the needle thing is hard to get I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did this last snowstorm that hit the midwest end up well NW of where a lot of the modeling had it?

I don't remember exact runs, but I remember the NAM being the farthest NW and the Euro the farthest SE with the GFS in the middle. It went a bit northwest of the GFS and the Euro corrected late in the game. No two systems are alike but I'm hoping for a faster turn northeast of course. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't remember exact runs, but I remember the NAM being the farthest NW and the Euro the farthest SE with the GFS in the middle. It went a bit northwest of the GFS and the Euro corrected late in the game. No two systems are alike but I'm hoping for a faster turn northeast of course. :D

Im looking for anything that will at least let me see snow falling at this point, don't care about accums. you guys who don't get that can have it :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of SGF earlier this morning - before the GFS run:

...PRELIM MORNING WINTER STORM UPDATE...

.UPDATE...

WANTED TO PROVIDE A VERY PRELIMINARY UPDATE REGARDING THE WINTER

STORM EXPECTED TO IMPACT AT LEAST PORTIONS OF THE CWA OVER THE

NEXT 48 HOURS. 12Z NAM HAS ARRIVED OVER THE LAST HOUR OR SO...AND

AN INITIAL LOOK SUGGESTS THAT IT HAS NOT CHANGED DRASTICALLY FROM

THE 00Z AND 06Z RUNS FROM LAST NIGHT...SAVE FOR A VERY SLIGHT (30

MILES AT MOST) SHIFT SOUTH. QPF FROM I-44 SOUTH REMAINS

HEAVY...WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR CONVECTIVE SNOW STILL A POSSIBILITY

ACROSS SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI. BASED ON THE 12Z NAM...MAY NEED TO

INCREASE SNOW TOTALS SUBSTANTIALLY FROM WHAT IS CURRENTLY

ADVERTISED OVER SOUTHERN MISSOURI. IT CERTAINLY APPEARS THAT THE

POTENTIAL FOR A MAJOR WINTER STORM REMAINS.

THAT SAID...HERE IS AN OUTLINE OF THE GAME PLAN FOR TODAY: GIVEN

THE UNCERTAINTIES WITH THIS STORM...AND THE FACT THAT THIS

MORNING`S 12Z GUIDANCE WILL HAVE THE BEST UPPER AIR DATA COVERAGE SO

FAR...WILL WAIT ON THE 12Z GFS BEFORE MAKING ANY CHANGES TO THE

OFFICIAL FORECAST. THE OPTIMISTIC HOPE IS THAT THE GFS TRENDS A

HAIR NORTH...BRINGING THE GFS AND NAM INTO NEAR LOCK-STEP. ONCE

THE 12Z NAM AND GFS HAVE BEEN EVALUATED...WILL ALLOW ANY CHANGES

TO GOING WATCHES/WARNINGS/ADVISORIES TO "FALL OUT" OF THE

FORECAST. HOPEFULLY...HEADLINE DECISIONS CAN BE MADE BY MIDDAY OR

VERY EARLY IN THE AFTERNOON.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahh there you are.. lol.. Maybe u will get the jackpot.

Not that I wouldn't love it, but I wish it would wait until later Christmas afternoon. We have to drive to Alma tomorrow morning and come back tomorrow afternoon. If the roads get iffy before we head back home, we're staying overnight. Our kids will love that, but my husband does NOT want to stay overnight at his mom's lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a question for someone (JoMo maybe). In looking at the surface low placement on the 12z NAM and GFS they are very similar in placement especially at H42 where the low is in NE MS in dang near the exact same place. However, the NAM brings the heavier precip further NW than the GFS does.

Anybody have any good insight into that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a question for someone (JoMo maybe). In looking at the surface low placement on the 12z NAM and GFS they are very similar in placement especially at H42 where the low is in NE MS in dang near the exact same place. However, the NAM brings the heavier precip further NW than the GFS does.

Anybody have any good insight into that?

The NAM continues to eject the upper level low farther N than the GFS as the system departs the Rockies.

Shows up nice in a 30 hour 12Z NAM/GFS 500 hpa comparison.

post-999-0-35944000-1356373282_thumb.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...