Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

OK / AR / KS / MO Winter 2013-2014


okie333

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

And the 12z GFS tells the 12z NAM it's crazy. Biggest snows in SE MO into N-Central Arkansas. E-OK and W-AR a bit less than the 06z GFS run.

The 12z NAM looked very Dec 23-24, 2002. This event was among the top 2 on the CIPS analog guidance as well.

122402_snow_event.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man springfield sounds really confident already and posted a snow totals map up on their site, I think its a bit to early for that in my opinion as this thing seems to have jumped NW a tad. Still has aways to go, this is the time I wish I lived further south lol. NAM says 8-9" for my county GFS says 1"....amazing difference!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are the NAM and GFS so completely different? Something's gotta give...

Because it's the NAM. lol

From a quick glance... The NAM is farther north and stronger with a tighter 700 MB low. The GFS is farther south and has a weaker 700 MB low until it gets farther east.

The 12z GGEM is going to look like that one Euro run with the heaviest snow falling across SE OK, SW and central to northeast Arkansas it looks like. Euro runs in an hour.

I wouldn't completely discount the NAM. If the system comes out stronger and farther north and gets it's act together quicker, it'll probably end up pretty close to the NAM solution. The last system we just had ended up farther northwest, closer to what the NAM was showing at the time. I remember the Euro was too far SE, the GFS had the low tracking over Joplin and the NAM had it tracking NW of Joplin. The end result was that it tracked NW of Joplin but not as far as the NAM had it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this rate will the NAM put AR into the warm sector, lol? Anyway,It certainly is a stretch to believe the NAM when it stands alone, BUT....Remember the "Highway 412" snow of February 2011 (I think) where the NAM stood alone against the model world and won? All along AR 412 between Siloam and well east into Newton County amounts were 20+".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18z NAM puts some Eminem "Won't Back Down" on it's iPod and sticks with it's northern solution. Dumps over 2 feet near in N Central OK. A little bit lesser amounts than the 12z run for the rest of the area.

HPC is not discounting it's more northern solution.

I just looked and I'd say the system won't be onshore until at least the 12z run tomorrow and maybe not until the 18z will be it fully sampled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NWS Tulsa sticking with the southern route for now and is issuing a WSW primarily south of 1-40. They are still discounting the NAM for now.

Take this for what it's worth, but www.4029tv.com has as interactive radar that has a "Futurecast" feature. This currently goes out to 2:00 PM on Christmas Day. The majority of snow at the end of the run is in N.Ok with 3-6 inches in some spots. It doesn't go out far enough yet to reach So. MO and NWA. I have no clue how accurate this is but it's interesting that it seems to be mirroring the NAM way more than the other models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Starting to see Norman, Tulsa, and Dodge City offices go with some sort of winter weather product ahead of this storm. What does everyone think, will the other models come to the NAM or is it on an island all its own and why?

I'm sticking with what I said last night. My 37 years of experience living in this area says that these storms almost always track NW of where the models set up a few days out. I'm not saying the NAM total snowfall amounts are accurate but the track isn't too far fetched in my opinion. Maybe that's wishful thinking. I'm in Benton County so I'll probably see some snow regardless of what pans out unless it shifts way south. I'm keeping my fingers crossed for you Tulsa, SE KS, So Mo friends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SGF going with a Winter Storm Watch for SC MO... interesting write up in relation to the NAM:

THE FIRST OUTCOME...AND THE OUTCOME WITH THE MOST MODEL SUPPORT AT

THIS TIME...IS FOR THIS STORM SYSTEM TO RAMP UP IN INTENSITY ALONG

THE RED RIVER VALLEY REGION...PIVOT ACROSS ARKANSAS AND EJECT

NORTHEAST INTO THE OHIO RIVER VALLEY REGION. THE HEAVY SNOW SWATH

JUST TO THE NORTHWEST OF THIS STORM TRACK WOULD CLIP SOUTH CENTRAL

MISSOURI...HOWELL/OREGON/SHANNON COUNTIES...WITH GRADUALLY LIGHTER

AMOUNTS TAPERING TO THE NORTHWEST (AROUND 1 INCH ALONG THE I-44

CORRIDOR). THE MODELS THAT SUPPORT THIS OUTCOME ARE THE

OPERATIONAL VERSIONS OF THE GFS...ECMWF AND GEM.

THE SECOND OUTCOME...ONE THAT HAS LESS MODEL SUPPORT BUT PHYSICALLY

MAKES SENSE AND REMAINS POSSIBLE...FEATURES A STORM TRACK A LITTLE

FARTHER TO THE NORTHWEST...BY ABOUT 50 OR SO MILES. WHILE 50

MILES DOES NOT SEEM LIKE MUCH...WITH A STRONG WINTER SYSTEM LIKE

THIS IT MEANS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LITTLE TO MINOR SNOW

ACCUMULATIONS AND SEVERAL INCHES OF SNOW. IN THIS CASE...THE HEAVY

SNOW TRACK WOULD EDGE MUCH CLOSER TO THE I-44 CORRIDOR. THE MODEL

RUNS THAT SUPPORT THIS OUTCOME ARE THE NAM...SREF MEAN AND SEVERAL

MEMBERS OF THE GEFS.

THE EVENTUAL TRACK WILL DEPEND ON EXACTLY WHEN/WHERE THE UPPER

LEVEL LOW STOPS DIGGING...PIVOTS AND BEGINS A TREK TO THE

NORTHEAST. WITH THIS SYSTEM NOW GETTING INTO THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST

AND HAVING A BETTER OPPORTUNITY TO BE SAMPLED BY THE RAOB NETWORK

THE HOPE IS THAT THE TRACK OF THIS STORM WILL BE MORE DEFINITIVE.

LOOKING AT THE SLU/CIPS ANALOGS OVER THE PAST FEW DAYS...THE

OUTPUT HAS FAVORED A SLIGHT NORTHWEST JOG IN THE FORECAST STORM

TRACK...WITH THE BEST PROBABILITIES FOR SNOWFALL ACCUMULATION

ALONG AND SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSTATE 44 CORRIDOR.

CONFIDENCE IS GREATER THAN 50 PERCENT FOR SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI

(HOWELL...OREGON AND SHANNON COUNTIES) TO RECEIVE SIX INCHES OF

SNOW OR GREATER. GIVEN THE UNCERTAIN WITH THE TRACK OF THIS SYSTEM

AND TAKING THE CONSENSUS OF THE TWO POTENTIAL STORM TRACKS...WILL

GO AHEAD AND INCLUDE AREAS ALONG AND SOUTHEAST OF A BRANSON TO

SALEM MISSOURI LINE IN A WINTER STORM WATCH. FOUR TO EIGHT INCHES

OF SNOW ARE POSSIBLE...WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR HIGHER AMOUNTS IN

SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI DUE TO A COUPLED JET STRUCTURE AND THE

POTENTIAL FOR SOME INSTABILITY.

IT CANNOT BE OVERSTATED THAT EVERYONE ACROSS EXTREME SOUTHEAST

KANSAS AND THE MISSOURI OZARKS NEEDS TO BE WEATHER AWARE OVER THE

NEXT FEW DAYS AND CHECK BACK FREQUENTLY TO THE LATEST FORECASTS.

THE FORECAST IS ALMOST ASSURED TO BE ALTERED IN SOME FASHION BASED

ON NEW MODEL RUNS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smack-dab in the middle of the watch here. We're monitoring for travel plans...we have to go to inlaws' about 22 miles east of us near Alma, AR Christmas morning, then return home Christmas afternoon. From the forecasts I've seen, the snow won't start until afternoon, so our morning trip *should* be ok. We're packing overnight bags just in case, but would prefer to get back home before the roads get nasty. We'll stay if we have to, we won't risk hazardous roads, especially with the kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18z NAM is an I-44'er. Looks like 15-18" for Tulsa, Probably 10-12" for Joplin. 12-15" for Monett. Heaviest snow band is right along I-44.

18z GFS is a bit farther south. Looks like 5-6" for Tulsa. 2" for Joplin. Fayetteville would have 6-8", Mountain Home 8-10" Heaviest south of I-44 in OK and N of I-40 in Arkansas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been up in KC today watching the Colts pull one out against the Chiefs so getting caught up tonite. Wow what is going on here? Did I throw the towel too soon last nite or is this just a big tease by the NAM. I know not to trust the NAM but perhaps the NW trend is really commencing, as per the midday GFS. The Euro is so consistent it worries me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...