Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,601
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

December 18-20 Potential Talking Points


earthlight

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'd probably give up the rest of the winter to have this solution play out. 24 HOURS of comma head insanity around the area. Given omegas and VV's it would likely be another thundersnow setup as well. The best part is how the thing stalls out because of how blocked up eastern Canada is.

I'm not pulling the trigger yet because of how volatile this whole setup is and how quickly it can change based on the S/W strength, phasing, and placement of the polar vortex, but if by Thursday this is still appearing on the models, I definitely will be. Definitely tons of potential with this pattern, and could be a prolific snow producer if the blocking upstream holds (with a suitable storm track as well). This doesn't seem like the kind of storm to dump heavy snow for 6-8 hours and lift out in a progressive flow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree...but the GFS is def. trending towards a very strong shortwave. It's been going that way for several runs. Given the fact that it's usually mundane, who knows..it might be on to something.

Maybe a huge coup for the Ukie?

Who knows...still 120 hours out :lol:

as was the NAM this run, don't you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See how the 500mb low over Wisconsin never drops into our storm? That's what I mean by it not phasing. There is a height contour wrapping around it, but the 500mb low never dropped in!

gfs_500_132s.gif

The only pieces that phase are the S/W moving out of Idaho/WY and the weak S/W over north Texas during the 84hr panel. This wave coming out of the upper Rockies has been trending stronger on subsequent runs, and allowing for strong amplification even without the PV phasing in. The blocked up flow does the rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This really is very similar to last years first December snow storm. A lot of the factors depended on the split in the PV. As the PV elongates to split, it either does not split in time and creates more of a wall that does not allow for the storm to dig well nor go up the coast and instead go more west, ala what we saw here in the GFS 6z:

gfs_500_132s.gif

Or the PV does split in time, creating a really nice gap between the two PV lobes allowing the trough to dig better and the storm to go right up between the gaps ala what we are seeing here in the GFS 12z:

gfs_500_126s.gif

We want to keep seeing this trend of the PV elongating and splitting just right. It allows for the right track with whatever wave we have to work with, whether it phases fully or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no phase with the northern stream. The GFS is just ridiculously strong and amplfied with the southern stream wave.

It actually just phases in a shortwave over MT/UT which it has been doing for a few runs now. Check out the loop, once that shortwave hits the trough base the entire thing amplifies dramatically

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/AVN_12z/avnloopnew.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you guys are really jumping on board because of one dream run.

What are the chances this actually verifies?

I think it just has to do more with the fact that people are excited that there are still models showing this as an event for us., especially considering that people have been tracking this storm for a few days now. I don't think anybody is "jumping on board" yet per say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you guys are really jumping on board because of one dream run.

What are the chances this actually verifies?

:huh: Are you serious? Have you been around? Many different models the past couple of days have been showing a good storm for this time frame. Nothing is set in stone yet, and things could change, but the potential is there and this is not just "one dream run."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you guys are really jumping on board because of one dream run.

What are the chances this actually verifies?

Alot of people on here live and die with each an every model run. At least this far out, more than 84hrs things look more optimistic than pesimistic. If every single model was in agreement that this thing was staying supressed you would see alot less optimism on the board however that is not the case. This is around the time frame when you want to see things moving in the right direction and both the 12z gfs and nam look promising. I think a general comprimise is best at this point, and I have a feeling that HPC will follow suite. Unless the Euro is a far southern outlier I would expect that more mets will jump on board with this storm this afternoon. If nothing else, I find it hard to see how some of us dont get in on at least high end advisory type snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you guys are really jumping on board because of one dream run.

What are the chances this actually verifies?

Not very likely. But it's one sol'n and increases the likelihood that A storm may develop. We won't get a better idea until the disturbance actually moves on shore tomorrow, I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12z GGEM is way out to sea

Thats one of the grossest differences I can ever recall between the GEM and GFS on a given run, remember too the GEM tends to be too warm and west...if the NOGAPS is over Amsterdam on its 12Z run we're in trouble...again I'd like to see it be just outside the benchmark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats one of the grossest differences I can ever recall between the GEM and GFS on a given run, remember too the GEM tends to be too warm and west...if the NOGAPS is over Amsterdam on its 12Z run we're in trouble...again I'd like to see it be just outside the benchmark.

Well you got your wish

ngp10.prp.132.namer.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...