Chicago Storm Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 0z GFS comes in with significant changes once again. Looks like NW. OH and MI end up with some accum snow. 0z ECMWF comes in looking fairly similar, except that the potential area of accum snow is larger/more widespread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppsRunner Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Euro bringing in heavy rains to SE MI points south FDY FTW? WED 00Z 30-NOV 2.9 -0.2 1000 97 97 0.39 548 548 WED 06Z 30-NOV 1.1 -3.6 1000 99 98 0.42 540 540 WED 12Z 30-NOV -0.1 -4.8 1008 87 89 0.24 545 539 Weird run... low is over Erie PA by 96hr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kab2791 Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Rains turns into accumulating snow across mentioned areas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kab2791 Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 0.4-0.6 QPF frozen verbatim across many areas of SE MI/IN/NW OH FDY FTW? WED 00Z 30-NOV 2.9 -0.2 1000 97 97 0.39 548 548 WED 06Z 30-NOV 1.1 -3.6 1000 99 98 0.42 540 540 WED 12Z 30-NOV -0.1 -4.8 1008 87 89 0.24 545 539 Weird run... low is over Erie PA by 96hr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppsRunner Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 0.4-0.6 QPF frozen verbatim across many areas of SE MI/IN/NW OH Absolutely one of the weirdest storms I can remember. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 I get the sense that this is going to be one of those aggravating events almost to the end. When we have the general idea figured out then we will have to move into the finer details such as changeover timing and BL temps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppsRunner Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 I get the sense that this is going to be one of those aggravating events almost to the end. When we have the general idea figured out then we will have to move into the finer details such as changeover timing and BL temps. If we are just comparing changeover timing... Dec. 10th last year reminds me of this. Supposed to change @ around 3a.m., didn't until 9a.m. Those can be really fun though. Especially if fun means awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoeWx Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 I get the sense that this is going to be one of those aggravating events almost to the end. When we have the general idea figured out then we will have to move into the finer details such as changeover timing and BL temps. Pretty much my thoughts exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kab2791 Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 wunderground ECMWF snowfall Updated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kab2791 Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 MODEL DIAGNOSTIC DISCUSSION NWS HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL PREDICTION CENTER CAMP SPRINGS MD 130 AM EST SAT NOV 26 2011 VALID NOV 26/0000 UTC THRU NOV 29/1200 UTC SOUTHERN STREAM DEEP CYCLONE FORMING/DRIFTING ACROSS THE DEEP SOUTH... PREFERENCE: 00Z UKMET/00Z ECMWF COMPROMISE WITH AVERAGE CONFIDENCE THE 00Z GFS DOES NOT LOOK WELL INITIALIZED WITH A SHORTWAVE IN WYOMING. ITS HEIGHTS IN THE SHORTWAVES VICINITY AT 500 HPA ARE IN ERROR ABOUT 20 METERS...BUT THIS COULD BE WHY ITS DEEP CYCLONE ENDS UP NORTH OF THE OTHER DETERMINISTIC GUIDANCE. THE 00Z NAM LOOKS BETTER INITIALIZED HERE. MERCIFULLY...THE DETERMINISTIC/ENSEMBLE MEAN GUIDANCE IS IN MUCH BETTER AGREEMENT WITH THIS SYSTEM THAN SEEN 24 HOURS AGO. HOWEVER...THE GFS/UKMET/ECMWF SOLUTIONS HAVE CHANGED SOMEWHAT SINCE THEIR PRIOR RUNS /TRENDING NORTHEAST TO VARYING DEGREES/...IMPLYING THAT THE GUIDANCE MAY NOT HAVE COMPLETELY SETTLED ITS ISSUES IN REGARDS TO THIS SYSTEM. INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN STREAM REMAIN TRICKY/MORE CHANGEABLE THAN MOST OTHER TYPES OF FLOW PATTERNS WITHIN NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION OUTPUT. THE OVERALL THE 12Z GLOBAL ENSEMBLE GUIDANCE STILL SHOWS A BIT OF SPREAD WITH PROGRESSION /CENTRAL TEXAS TO OFFSHORE NORTH CAROLINA/...THOUGH MOST OF THE MEMBERS NOW LIE AT LOW LATITUDE...CLOSE TO THE 33RD PARALLEL. THE 12Z GEFS MEMBERS/18Z GEFS MEAN SHOW A SLOWER PROGRESSION THAN THE 12Z ECMWF ENSEMBLE MEMBERS AND MEAN...WHICH IS IN CONTRAST TO THE 00Z GEFS MEAN WHICH IS QUICKER/NORTHEAST. IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THE RUN-TO-RUN AND DAY-TO-DAY CHANGES IN THE GEFS MEAN ARE DONE...LOWERING CONFIDENCE IN ITS USE. HOWEVER...AT LEAST ONE PIECE OF DETERMINISTIC GUIDANCE IS SHOWING ITS NORMAL BIAS WITH CLOSED CYCLONES...TOO SLOW IN THE CASE OF THE CANADIAN SOLUTION. THE 00Z GFS IS THE DEEPEST ALOFT. WITHIN MOST OF THE GUIDANCE...COMMA HEAD SNOWS FOR THE DEEP AND MID SOUTH ARE POSSIBLE WHICH WOULD BE QUITE EARLY IN THE SEASON FOR SUCH AN EVENT. THE 00Z GFS IS A COMPLETE OUTLIER WITHIN THE DETERMINISTIC GUIDANCE WITH THIS SYSTEMS PLACEMENT AND DEPTH...LYING ON THE NORTHERN FRINGE OF THE 12Z GLOBAL ENSEMBLE GUIDANCE LIKELY DUE TO ITS IMPROPER INITIALIZATION...SO WILL CONSIDER ITS SOLUTION TOO FAR NORTH. HOWEVER...THE 00Z UKMET/00Z ECMWF SHIFTED NORTHEAST FROM ITS PREVIOUS RUN...MATCHING THE 12Z ECMWF ENSEMBLE MEAN. THE GUIDANCE HAS DEFINITELY TRENDED DEEPER WITH THIS SYSTEM SINCE THIS TIME YESTERDAY...CONVERGING UPON THE DEPTH SEEN ON CANADIAN RUNS 24-36 HOURS AGO...WHICH MEANS THEIR STANDARDIZED ANOMALIES AT 500 HPA ACROSS LOUISIANA ARE QUITE SIGNIFICANT...OVER FIVE STANDARD DEVIATIONS BELOW CLIMATOLOGY BY TUESDAY MORNING...IMPLYING A RECORD/VERY UNUSUAL EVENT FOR LATE NOVEMBER IS IN THE CARDS. TO ACCOUNT FOR RECENT NORTHEAST TRENDS ALOFT...WILL PREFER A COMPROMISE BETWEEN THE 00Z UKMET/00Z ECMWF. CONFIDENCE IS AVERAGE BECAUSE OF THE LARGE SPREAD STILL SEEN AMONGST THE GLOBAL ENSEMBLE GUIDANCE IN A FEW DAYS...CONTINUING RUN-TO-RUN AND DAY-TO-DAY INSTABILITY IN THE DETERMINISTIC GUIDANCE...AND THE UNCLIMATOLOGICAL DEPTH SHOWN BY THE DETERMINISTIC GUIDANCE. THE 21Z SREF MEAN/00Z NAM NOW APPEAR TO BE TOO FAR TO THE SOUTH WITH THIS SYSTEM AND LESS USEFUL. FOR WINTER WEATHER IMPACTS OF THIS SYSTEM...CONSULT HPC WINTER WEATHER PRODUCTS AND OUR HEAVY SNOW/ICING DISCUSSION...WHICH ARE DUE AT 0930Z/0430 AM EST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Just took a quick peek at the GGEM precip type plots and they are an absolute mess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunder Road Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Just took a quick peek at the GGEM precip type plots and they are an absolute mess. It looks like they try to change over the areas of heavier precip where you get enchanced evap cooling but leaves the fringe areas as rain. Sure that can, and does, happen on a relatively small scale, but I'm skeptical of Chicago seeing light rain while N IN sees heavy snow and C IN sees moderate rain. It just seems weird to see such a long band of snow embedded in rain like that. Overall though it's neat that the GFS, GGEM and ECM all seems to be bullseye-ing SE MI, NE IN and NW OH. Now we just need consistency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern_IN_Wx Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Impressed by 00z guidance. Enough dynamic cooling/evaporation to allow for a changeover? It is a serious question because I have no idea. Gotta love marginal BL events. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Well if nothing else, looking over the 0z runs just now, the next two systems look to combine to bring a good amount of precipitation...from basically eastern IL on eastward. Details of course, to be ironed out later with the trailing system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Martin Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 FDY FTW? WED 00Z 30-NOV 2.9 -0.2 1000 97 97 0.39 548 548 WED 06Z 30-NOV 1.1 -3.6 1000 99 98 0.42 540 540 WED 12Z 30-NOV -0.1 -4.8 1008 87 89 0.24 545 539 Weird run... low is over Erie PA by 96hr Did I just hear you say possibly accumulating snow for Findlay at the end of the weekend into early next week?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hm8 Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 DTX mentions the possibility of accumulating snow at the end of their AFD...kinda surprised its the first time they've mentioned it, actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppsRunner Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 NAM looks torchy at the end of its run... a lot futher west than any other solution too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 NAM looks torchy at the end of its run... a lot futher west than any other solution too so is the 12z GFS...sfc low occludes in eastern IN then heads northeast to CLE. Here is a sounding for around here at 84hr on the NAM, very shallow but quite the shallow warm layer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppsRunner Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 so is the 12z GFS...sfc low occludes in eastern IN then heads northeast to CLE. Here is a sounding for around here at 84hr on the NAM, very shallow but quite the shallow warm layer. Yeah, I'm not sure what to do with the NAM, given that the SREF mean is well east, pretty much just the ARW (or ARN- can't see it too well on the ewall) are that far west. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppsRunner Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Yep, GFS ensembles are pretty much the same as before, right up the OH/PA border. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunder Road Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Yeah, I'm not sure what to do with the NAM, given that the SREF mean is well east, pretty much just the ARW (or ARN- can't see it too well on the ewall) are that far west. Just from my experience, it seems that the NAM, once it latches on to a storm, usually starts off farther west/more amplified, then tends to settle in with the other guidance in 24 hours or so. I think that's what'll happen here as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Just from my experience, it seems that the NAM, once it latches on to a storm, usually starts off farther west/more amplified, then tends to settle in with the other guidance in 24 hours or so. I think that's what'll happen here as well. The 12z GFS also came in farther west. Edit: The same can be said about some of the ensemble members. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppsRunner Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 GEM goes from around Athens, OH to Erie PA. Don't really know about temps though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppsRunner Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 The 12z GFS also came in farther west. Edit: The same can be said about some of the ensemble members. GFS/NAM having issues again: ...DEEP CLOSED LOW FORMING OVER THE SRN STATES...PREFERENCE: 00Z ECMWF/00Z UKMET/06Z GEFS MEAN BLEND ADJUSTED NOMORE THAN 1/3 TOWARD THE 12Z UKMET BY MON-TUETHE 250 MB GFS WIND SPEED ANALYSIS IS 10-17 KTS WEAKER THANREPORTED BY RAOBS OVER MONTANA AND ALBERTA. NAM ERRORS OF SIMILARMAGNITUDE ARE CONFINED TO WRN MT/ALBERTA. NOTE THAT THE 00Z ECMWFFCST VALID AT 12Z COMPARES BETTER TO OBS VALUE OVER CNTRL ALBERTABUT IS 20 KTS WEAK AT GGW AND ABOUT 15 KTS WEAK AT TFX.PRIMARILY FROM SUN INTO MON THE NAM SHOWS A LITTLE MORE SEWDAMPLITUDE THAN CONSENSUS WITH THE OVERALL TROF CONTAINING THEDEVELOPING CLOSED LOW. AT SOME FCST HRS THE NAM CLOSED LOW IS ALITTLE DEEPER THAN MOST OTHER SOLNS BUT NOT TO AN EXTREMEDEGREE... AND THE 12Z GFS RIVALS THE NAM DEPTH BY MON NIGHT-TUE. THE GFS STRAYS TO THE FASTER SIDE OF THE GUIDANCE SPREAD BY F84LATE TUE. THE 00Z ECMWF/ECMWF MEAN AND 00Z UKMET ALONG WITH THE06Z GEFS MEAN HAD FORMED A MAJORITY CLUSTER THAT IS SOMEWHATSLOWER THAN THE GFS/NAM WITH NEWD PROGRESSION OF THE CLOSED LOWALOFT WHILE THE 09Z SREF MEAN AND 00Z CMC WERE EVEN SLOWER TOVARYING DEGREES. SLOWER TREND OF THE 12Z UKMET ALONG WITHRELATIVE PERSISTENCE OF THE 12Z CMC PLUS 12Z CANADIAN REG GEM THRUF48 EARLY MON APPEAR TO INCREASE POTENTIAL FOR TIMING SLOWER THANTHE 00Z ECMWF CLUSTER. SLOWER TRENDS IN THE GFS/NAM OVER THE PASTDAY AS WELL AS PSBL IMPACT OF INITIALIZATION DIFFS WITH WIND SPEEDAT 250 MB OVER MT/ALBERTA PROVIDE FURTHER SUPPORT FOR CLOSING OFFTHE LOW A LITTLE WWD OF THE NAM/GFS IN PARTICULAR AND PERHAPS EVENTHE 00Z ECMWF. POOR AGREEMENT/CONTINUITY OF VARIOUS GUIDANCE WITHTHIS SYS OVER RECENT DAYS ALONG WITH SLIGHTLY FASTER TREND OF 12ZGEFS MEAN FAVOR HOLDING ONTO THE PREVIOUSLY FAVORED 00Z ECMWF/06ZGEFS MEAN/00Z UKMET BLEND OR SLOWER ADJUSTMENT NO MORE THAN 1/3TOWARD THE 12Z UKMET BY MON-TUE. CONFIDENCE IS BELOW AVERAGE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Organizing Low Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 GEM destroyed the GFS and euro with this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppsRunner Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 ECMWF is a tad further west with the low... nice hit from FWA to I-75 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 12z EURO destroys parts of S-C MI, particularly in the Lansing-Saginaw corridor. I'm sure the wundermaps are every bit as clownish as the Earl Barker NAM maps, but still, verbatim we're talking ~18" of cement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kab2791 Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 12z EURO destroys parts of S-C MI, particularly in the Lansing-Saginaw corridor. I'm sure the wundermaps are every bit as clownish as the Earl Barker NAM maps, but still, verbatim we're talking ~18" of cement. Not quite, more like 4-7" given the marginal temps earlier. KLAN WED 00Z 30-NOV 1.1 0.8 1009 96 100 0.81 554 547 WED 06Z 30-NOV 0.7 -0.7 1004 92 100 0.57 547 544 WED 12Z 30-NOV -0.2 -3.9 1006 89 98 0.54 543 539 WED 18Z 30-NOV 0.9 -2.8 1009 66 83 0.11 547 540 However, Euro snow maps would suggest more. Good dynamic cooling? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo6899 Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 NW trend FTL. Either way thats a helluva eye to the storm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Not quite, more like 4-7" given the marginal temps earlier. KLAN WED 00Z 30-NOV 1.1 0.8 1009 96 100 0.81 554 547 WED 06Z 30-NOV 0.7 -0.7 1004 92 100 0.57 547 544 WED 12Z 30-NOV -0.2 -3.9 1006 89 98 0.54 543 539 WED 18Z 30-NOV 0.9 -2.8 1009 66 83 0.11 547 540 However, Euro snow maps would suggest more. Good dynamic cooling? I just added every three hour interval for the area just W of KLAN to come up with that number. I have no idea what goes into the algorithms to make those clown maps. I think your methodology of using the text output is a lot more sound Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.