Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

SE Mid-Long Range Discussion


CAD_Wedge_NC

Recommended Posts

the fact that GFS is pretty close overall the the ECMWF at this time range is pretty good news I think. If tonights run comes in similar to its last couple , then we may have a legit threat of a Winter type storm in part of the Southeast. I wouldn't want any ice though, and a strong damming high like on todays run would be pretty scary with that setup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'm in no way saying it will happen, but if you blend the last couple ECMWF and GFS, you get something close to Jan 1987. That can't happen because its the biggest snowstorm I've ever seen here.

I was actually looking at Dec 27 1997 as a similar looking setup. Positive tilt trough. Marginal cold air with low in NE Gulf tracking up the coast. Cold rain in Asheville that ended as a couple hours of snow. Rain/Snow mix in Knoxville that did not accumulate, with sfc temps 34-36.

122712.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not the best model reader but, is the 6z showing snow for the WNC Mnts around the 162-180hr panels?....maybe 3-4 inches?

Probably so, but in higher elevations. Asheville has cold rain and sfc temps in low 40's down to upper 30's during that timeframe per Meteostar - http://wxweb.meteostar.com/sample/sample.shtml?text=kavl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And then the 6z GFS gives us this; the 850 zero has just past RDU about three hours before with between .5 and .75 liquid equiv. still to fall. Now I still don't believe this until it gets closer, but as Robert said it's great to have something to track.

gfs_namer_180_850_temp_mslp_precip.gif

I think our (central NC) best bet for snow in this pattern (if even possible) will be something like this, i.e. an overrunning event. Any wrapped up LP system will more than likely track over the piedmont or mountains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think our (central NC) best bet for snow in this pattern (if even possible) will be something like this, i.e. an overrunning event. Any wrapped up LP system will more than likely track over the piedmont or mountains.

I kinda think the opposite in this setup. I'd like the idea of a wrapped up, deepening storm, IF it didn't track too far inland, which it would probably do. Reason is, there is no good mechanism to "push" the cold into the area east of the Apps. A 1032 high in Texas won't do it. If we don't have a strong high in the midwest, Lakes, or NE building east and SE, then it's going to be hard for any air that's cold enough to funnel in here. A strong, deepening storm however, could help deliver cold, but only if it took the right track (a Piedmont cutter won't do it, as you pointed out). But the models are not really showing either of those scenarios yet, so I remain very skeptical at this point. Hopefully we can thread the needle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kinda think the opposite in this setup. I'd like the idea of a wrapped up, deepening storm, IF it didn't track too far inland, which it would probably do. Reason is, there is no good mechanism to "push" the cold into the area east of the Apps. A 1032 high in Texas won't do it. If we don't have a strong high in the midwest, Lakes, or NE building east and SE, then it's going to be hard for any air that's cold enough to funnel in here. A strong, deepening storm however, could help deliver cold, but only if it took the right track (a Piedmont cutter won't do it, as you pointed out). But the models are not really showing either of those scenarios yet, so I remain very skeptical at this point. Hopefully we can thread the needle.

I agree as well, surface temps will be the hardest thing to overcome. Map looks great but if temps are in the 40s it will take a lot of evaporational cooling; which by the time it worked the precep would be leaving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kinda think the opposite in this setup. I'd like the idea of a wrapped up, deepening storm, IF it didn't track too far inland, which it would probably do. Reason is, there is no good mechanism to "push" the cold into the area east of the Apps. A 1032 high in Texas won't do it. If we don't have a strong high in the midwest, Lakes, or NE building east and SE, then it's going to be hard for any air that's cold enough to funnel in here. A strong, deepening storm however, could help deliver cold, but only if it took the right track (a Piedmont cutter won't do it, as you pointed out). But the models are not really showing either of those scenarios yet, so I remain very skeptical at this point. Hopefully we can thread the needle.

I agree, threading the needle never works out for us, only people that have any hope are the mountains, but atleast we can root for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And then the 6z GFS gives us this; the 850 zero has just past RDU about three hours before with between .5 and .75 liquid equiv. still to fall. Now I still don't believe this until it gets closer, but as Robert said it's great to have something to track.

gfs_namer_180_850_temp_mslp_precip.gif

You're not reading this correctly. Virtually all, if not all, of the precip. shown falls before the 850 reaches 0c. This is cold chasing the moisture away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So many s/w in the flow, the models are all amplifying different ones at different times and in different places. It would indeed be a miracle if one of them works out in this pattern I think. Getting the cold to penetrate far enough south just ahead of one of them will be the hard and most unlikely part. Somebody might get lucky though. Still a fun pattern to watch, because all the models show the massive zonal flow and warm up after Christmas, but that probably won't last too long or be boring for that long, despite those awful indices. Obviously things change daily, and usually in favor of more action quickly. Probably the best chance would be ECMWF from yesterdays 12z run, that allows such a far south cutoff and a high to build in on both sides of the storm, but we'd only have a 2 day window of any cold air...and thats a big long shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're not reading this correctly. Virtually all, if not all, of the precip. shown falls before the 850 reaches 0c. This is cold chasing the moisture away.

No the 850 line had already past RDU three hours before. The below frame is three hours farther out. Still shows > .25 precip for central NC. But as I stated in another post surface temps are our greatest worry (other than if this setup is even right).

gfs_namer_183_850_temp_mslp_precip.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

0z gfs mems @ 120hrs, op top left, some have a cad look Christmas Eve, maybe an icing issue for NW NC is starting to take shape. After, and even at this period the model is still pretty fluid. This may be one of the wettest Christmas weekends in a long time though. rn chances Weds/night, another Fri/Sat, then possibly the bigger storm Sun night & Mo. Cold air yet to be determined, even at day 5.

post-382-0-14653100-1324305018.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The euro at 240 is just nuts, a close low just east of GA/SC, another strong vort over TX/LA. Robert's been calling for this, crazy active pattern. To bad there isn't cold to work with because it could be a monumental winter. Just worried we are going to get the blocking we need finally and than the wet pattern fizzles out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The euro at 240 is just nuts, a close low just east of GA/SC, another strong vort over TX/LA. Robert's been calling for this, crazy active pattern. To bad there isn't cold to work with because it could be a monumental winter. Just worried we are going to get the blocking we need finally and than the wet pattern fizzles out.

Thats in the back of my mind as well. However, when or if that blocking occurs It's probably at that time frame we could get the 2 to hook up at the right moment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No the 850 line had already past RDU three hours before. The below frame is three hours farther out. Still shows > .25 precip for central NC. But as I stated in another post surface temps are our greatest worry (other than if this setup is even right).

Larry is right, this model run does not show snow for RDU... Cold chasing the moisture away. The map you have here shows 12 hour precip....

I completely agree with Larry....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...