Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Dec 11-13 MW/Lakes/OV snow event part 4


Hoosier

Recommended Posts

I'm still trying to figure out what happened to the secondary development over VA/PA a lot of the models were indicating 36 hours ago. Seems like right now it's just the primary tracking through Lk Erie/NY and that's all she wrote. I know there's a bias with models for transferring energy from primaries too quickly, but the fact that this thing occluded so early would have made me think a transfer was more likely.

maybe some mets can clarify, but i would think when we lose that tight digging ULL to a more open trough, a secondary development would be less likely and the main low would move out much quicker...

....i'm guessing on that.

but thats the trend i'm seeing with these recent runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 987
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'm still trying to figure out what happened to the secondary development over VA/PA a lot of the models were indicating 36 hours ago. Seems like right now it's just the primary tracking through Lk Erie/NY and that's all she wrote. I know there's a bias with models for transferring energy from primaries too quickly, but the fact that this thing occluded so early would have made me think a transfer was more likely.

isnt that usually the case in la nina's, stronger primaries?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems that LOT is looking for most of the qpf to fall as liquid.. .The forecast is for rain and then mix into the overnight with no new accumulation, and only 1-3" by the end of the day Sunday. Contrast that with Skilling's call for nearly 11" by Monday morning.

I am watching sat maps and the radar watching things unfold now, right now, the low is in NW IA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MESOSCALE DISCUSSION 2120

NWS STORM PREDICTION CENTER NORMAN OK

0956 AM CST SAT DEC 11 2010

AREAS AFFECTED...WCNTRL/SWRN WI...SCNTRL/ECNTRL/SERN MN AND

NWRN/NCNTRL/NERN IA

CONCERNING...HEAVY SNOW

VALID 111556Z - 112100Z

HEAVY SNOWBANDS WILL SLOWLY DEVELOP SEWD THIS AFTERNOON/EARLY

EVENING. THE HEAVIEST AND MOST PERSISTENT HOURLY RATES OF 1-1.5

INCHES ARE LIKELY IN A 75-100 MILE CORRIDOR CENTERED FROM SPENCER

IA-30NW ROCHESTER MN-35N WAUSAU WI THROUGH 00Z.

ALL INDICATIONS SUGGEST THAT THE NCNTRL IA 1000 MB LOW WILL DEVELOP

ESE INTO STRONGEST PRESSURE FALL AXIS TO NWRN IL BY 00Z. LATE

MORNING MODERATE-HEAVY SNOWBANDS ALONG/NW OF THE INVERTED SFC TROUGH

FROM THE MSP AREA SWWD TO NWRN IA WILL CORRESPONDINGLY SHIFT SEWD

THROUGH THE AFTERNOON. THE STRONGEST AND MOST PERSISTENT

LOW/MID-LEVEL FRONTOGENESIS WILL BECOME QUASI-STATIONARY THIS

AFTERNOON/EARLY EVENING ACROSS NCNTRL IA INTO THE SERN THIRD OF MN

AND WCNTRL WI. SNOWBANDS WILL LIKELY INTENSIFY AND NARROW AS

STRONGEST 700-500 MB UVV SPREADS ATOP MESOSCALE FORCING AND 1-1.5

INCH PER HOUR SNOWFALL RATES CAN BE EXPECTED FOR SEVERAL HOURS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GFS looks like it'll be a hair colder for Toronto but we'll still likely see a changeover to rain. NAM is nuts keeping us all snow and 10" worth. If we had an antecedent arctic airmass in place the NAM may have been right, but alas we do not. The changeover line is going to be real close, even following the RGEM/GFS camp. A further slight shift south could make this interesting, but it's low probability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: doesn't that go against everything your forecast office is predicting?

In this case...yes. I never get too excited about getting dry slotted and then counting on the TROWAL/Defo band to hold together as the system occludes. The 1-3" is just for the synoptic event. Maybe some additional amounts when that band nudges eastward Sunday night into Monday. I hope the office is right. I'm just drinkin and snow mobiling up here...so what do I know :drunk:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GFS looks like it'll be a hair colder for Toronto but we'll still likely see a changeover to rain. NAM is nuts keeping us all snow and 10" worth. If we had an antecedent arctic airmass in place the NAM may have been right, but alas we do not. The changeover line is going to be real close, even following the RGEM/GFS camp. A further slight shift south could make this interesting, but it's low probability.

how do you get 850s on the RGEM?

is there a map/link/site?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In this case...yes. I never get too excited about getting dry slotted and then counting on the TROWAL/Defo band to hold together as the system occludes. The 1-3" is just for the synoptic event. Maybe some additional amounts when that band nudges eastward Sunday night into Monday. I hope the office is right. I'm just drinkin and snow mobiling up here...so what do I know :drunk:

Well have fun up there! I hope you're wrong and come home to at least 6" of snow. I'm riding the IWX wagon for now :scooter:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems that LOT is looking for most of the qpf to fall as liquid.. .The forecast is for rain and then mix into the overnight with no new accumulation, and only 1-3" by the end of the day Sunday. Contrast that with Skilling's call for nearly 11" by Monday morning.

I am watching sat maps and the radar watching things unfold now, right now, the low is in NW IA

4-5 is probably most likely north and east (LE), with 1-3 south and west. I was thinking the high end amounts might verify like Skilling, but per the 9z SREFs a nasty warm tounge keeps most of the area rain until at least 6z, so those calls are in trouble. Recent trends also accelerate the low eastward which would shorten the duration of our defo snows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We must have had a mixed bag. The snow was very dense, slushy, and the shovel had a layer of ice on it when i picked it up. Maybe 3 inches

Radar was showing yellows and oranges just to your west much of the morning, and the se mn reporting stations mainly reported mixed precip or freezing rain for much of that time. I wasn't sure about La Crosse, as their hourly observations listed snow for most of the early morn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overnight and into tomorrow for eastern IA, southern WI, and northern IL, I wonder if the wind speeds during the accumulating snowfall will be enough to have the 'blast effect' on the snowflakes, where areas end up with a decent amount of qpf, but actual accumulation is tempered. In other words, slightly lowered accumulation tallies not just because it will be blowing around in general but because the flakes will end up being pulverized in their descent. Or are the high winds really not expected until after the majority of our precipitation falls?

I am leaving shortly and will be down in Newark, IL (roughly twelve miles north of I-80 and 25 miles east of I-39) overnight and returning to Woodstock around 10:30 a.m. tomorrow morning. I am heading towards an area more likely to get dry slotted, but then again, the 45 miles back north through mostly open farm country on Rt. 47 should be a real treat.

Like has been said, it doesn't take much accumulation to get things dicey with the winds expected, so I am expecting that will be the primary element of concern more so than actual accumulations.

That said, I will throw out a call for 1-3" in Newark by my departure time at 10:30 a.m. tomorrow and a 4-7" total in Woodstock. Thanks for all of the analysis and chatter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how do you get 850s on the RGEM?

is there a map/link/site?

You used to be able to get them off the PSU site, but the RGEM doesn't update there anymore. I was describing what the RGEM showed in terms of p-type from this instead:

http://collaboration.cmc.ec.gc.ca/cmc/cmdn/pcpn_type/pcpn_type_gem_reg.html

^^^I'm pretty sure you already know about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still waiting for Chanhassen to release some totals from their office, but right now the closest observed total to me is 10.5" across the river in Shakopee. The highest total so far is 11" in Oakdale which is in the east metro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...