Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

potential for a few mangled flakes part 3


earthlight

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 885
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Yeah, if you also cut NAM QPF some then you get my expectations. NAM RAW with 10:1 is a foot or so back home. Cut the ratios in half and then cut the snow QPF in half and you get the 2-4 I'm expecting. Of course, high bust potential all the way around, but climo must take effect SOMEWHERE... so I put it into the ratios. And of course the QPF adjustment is just because its the NAM ;)

Also, given that no model is forecasting outright freezing temps at the surface, even the cold NAM, it seems likely that ratios will be unusually low. And of course, it might have been cold today by October standards, but it was warm by snowstorm standards.

I fully expect a lot of obs along I-95 to be +SN at 33 over 33 tomorrow late aft/eve.

I agree for high bust potential. Forecasting rain changing to snow events in my experience have always very challenging and more times than not disappointing for snow enthusiasts. Two issues that have me against anything significant at Central Park, NYC is ground temperatures and the mild sea surface temperature off the NYC coast. Anyway, I'd love to be surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These H7 low tracks and orientation definitely seems to favor the areas further west. But it's nice to see that the GFS is spitting out higher QPF numbers - it's catching on to the insane dynamics that this system will have. The PVA is maximized at our latitudes, that's always good to see.

Yeah the H7 low track is pretty unfavorable for I-95 until about 00z-03z, when it's finally to our east. Looks to me like the final 2-4 hours of the storm will feature the transition to accumulating snow for most of us; the timing for that backend snow is pretty good, occurring around 03z tomorrow evening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The PVA on the GFS between 27 and 33 hours is tremendous! This tends to favor lots of upward vertical motion, and the fact that it migrates eastward with time greatly supports the notion of initially having the strongest banding in E PA and NW Jersey, and then having it pivot eastward and east northeastward during the evening hours. Not a bad place to be! Kind of similar to 1/26/11 in that regard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm the latest GFS is a touch weaker with the surface low... the second run in a row to slightly weaken this feature. I think the reason for the subtle changes is how the energy with Rina is robbing the moisture transport in the Atlantic further north. Thus, totals are slightly reduced and the surface low is weaker with less latent heat to play with for cyclogenesis. The feature is real, despite Rita being a remnant low, because its convection has continued to fire up to the NE and is now crossing the Florida coastline. This may be the deciding factor between a crippling snowstorm and a more manageable one. I wouldn't be surprised if precipitation is scaled back further in later model runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NYC is 45/31 at 6PM

NWS forecast low is 42... that is going to (hopefully) bust rather high

We've already got a pretty thick overcast overhead, and with no precip overnight, there's not much reason to fall below 42. Tonight's temps don't have any bearing on temps during the storm either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...