Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

potential for a few mangled flakes part 3


earthlight

Recommended Posts

Yep... look at all those blobs of pinks and reds south of the low center... all that convection is preventing the best moisture influx into the area where cyclogenesis is occurring. This is why we see a weaker solution.

I dont think a couple mb here and there is much of a difference. If it was truly weaker the ccb would not be as intense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 885
  • Created
  • Last Reply

What happens from 0z on is what NYC east is interested in (snow wise). Before that, it's rain, likely across the board. If the CCB develops and is able to pivot east, we cash in at least to maybe mid Suffolk. IF the banding falls apart, we get little snow.Even this GFS run has an impressive band move through the area after 0z when heights crash and temps rapidly drop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's just enough of a tick south and east to allow for this ccb to be better. Thicknesses are lower and the thermal profiles are better. By a hair.

Even thermal profiles being a hair cooler make all the difference. The 850s don't appear to warm above 0 C where I am in C NJ, but the 18z pushed the h850 0 C line all the way into Morris county.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone was thinking winds wouldnt be an issue on LI, check out this sounding at ISP at 06z Sunday. Theres 36 kt winds sustained at the surface on the 00z GFS and winds over 60 just above. Oh and the profile supports snow in the wrap around band. Surface temps are around 3C but its below freezing from 950mb up

http://vortex.plymou...el&size=912x650

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still do not buy this will happen for the coast as much as so many models want to show it happening and I'm actually forecasting it to happen, it just seems too ridiculous that even 3 or 4 inches of snow could fall on October 30th on Long Island.

We had the snowiest January on record this year.

Then, we had the hottest day ever recorded.

Then, we had an earthquake, AND a landfalling hurricane in New Jersey, in the same week, which culminated with the wettest August in history!

So, an October snowstorm makes sense!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had the snowiest January on record this year.

Then, we had the hottest day ever recorded.

Then, we had an earthquake, AND a landfalling hurricane in New Jersey, in the same week, which culminated with the wettest August in history!

So, an October snowstorm makes sense!

Watch NYC record 2.7 inches of snow tomorrow and then a trace for the entire winter and finish with the least snowiest winter on record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think differences in model resolution causes these sort of differences between the GFS and NAM?

Well they both shows the very strong convective signature in Florida moving offshore and remaining robust. Thats what we need to be on the lookout for over the next 12 hours to see if that solution verifies.

I dont think a couple mb here and there is much of a difference. If it was truly weaker the ccb would not be as intense

If you compare the 500mb features between 12z, 18z, and 00z... you will notice a subtle but significant de-amplification of the trough... not quite as negatively tilted as before. This will have more implications on the position of features... with the CCB probably not making it as far west in the earlier time frames. The general trend is the slow the system down as it bombs out at a later interval, meaning folks in MA and CT are looking pretty good at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...