Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Tracking the Late October Potential


stormtracker

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I will probably stay up for the GFS and Euro.....you will see them tomorrow....I'm still bothered a bit by the date even if the models hammer us.....

only people on weather boards eagerly predict extremely anomalous events days out. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the NAM holds at 12z, what would you do? I know you're usually cautious (and with good reason).

I think the forecast depends on whether you are forecasting for the public or not....If you aren't forecasting for the general public I think you have to hedge given the date....If you are forecasting for the public and there is consensus guidance, you probably have to mention the more extreme impacts that are possible, particularly tree limbs and branches at certain elevations...once you reach a certain elevation it is really no different than being blasted at sea level on 11/11/87 or 11/6/53 so the date is not really an excuse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point! That's the problem most forecasters are facing. We're looking at climatology, which we're all taught to do, especially during this time of year. BUT snow is possible in October and there is a first for everything. You gotta be conservative to start, and wait till tomorrow and see what everything is saying.

like i just pointed out we should really compare into nov anyway.. we have an 11.5" storm right around the corner. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the forecast depends on whether you are forecasting for the public or not....If you aren't forecasting for the general public I think you have to hedge given the date....If you are forecasting for the public and there is consensus guidance, you probably have to mention the more extreme impacts that are possible, particularly tree limbs and branches at certain elevations...once you reach a certain elevation it is really no different than being blasted at sea level on 11/11/87 or 11/6/53 so the date is not really an excuse

How much does 1 week really matter though? The abundance of "cold" in the NH varies year by year on relative timing longer than that of 1 week. If it were over 2 days out I could see why progged soundings could be expected to fall more in line with climo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the forecast depends on whether you are forecasting for the public or not....If you aren't forecasting for the general public I think you have to hedge given the date....If you are forecasting for the public and there is consensus guidance, you probably have to mention the more extreme impacts that are possible, particularly tree limbs and branches at certain elevations...once you reach a certain elevation it is really no different than being blasted at sea level on 11/11/87 or 11/6/53 so the date is not really an excuse

I agree for the most part. There's no way I'd be going all in and tweeting/facebooking about 6 to 12" etc. I'd mention the possibility of seeing some snow, with the usual areas to the N and W in line for some potential accumulations. But if the 12z runs hold, I'd ramp it up a bit, but by no means would I rip and read.

if i hadnt seen the nam i'd like dt's forecast a lot.

Yup. It looks reasonable at first glance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much does 1 week really matter though? The abundance of "cold" in the NH varies year by year on relative timing longer than that of 1 week. If it were over 2 days out I could see why progged soundings could be expected to fall more in line with climo.

I think anything at lower elevations before Thanksgiving merits skepticism...the sample isn't very saturated with moderate/big events up to that point....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was forecasting, the problem would be how do you convey to people what even a few inches of snow can do to trees that still have almost ALL of their leaves. Not like people around here have a lot of experience with that, and I am not even sure myself what the trigger is in that circumstance between a few branches down vs. widespread, tree/power damage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NAM has mby all snow at 16Z on Saturday

plenty of qpf to fall thereafter with the best dynamics after then as well

I'm scared :unsure:

You should be scared mitch, those UVV's as indicated on the NAM were pretty hefty with the perfect 850 low position. The shortwave was optimal on 18z but the point is you are right to be frightened haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think anything at lower elevations before Thanksgiving merits skepticism...the sample isn't very saturated with moderate/big events up to that point....

Ok thanks. I was just curious regarding your comparison (taken verbatim) of the 11/6 and 11/11 events and that "being blasted at sea level" on those dates feature some sort of difference atmospherically to this scenario which is a fine line between too amped/far west to too far east w/ lighter precip + less dynamical cooling. I guess I misunderstood the message?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should be scared mitch, those UVV's as indicated on the NAM were pretty hefty with the perfect 850 low position. The shortwave was optimal on 18z but the point is you are right to be frightened haha.

almost 2 days of runs off the Euro showing anywhere from 4-8", now the NAM and GFS are right there with it, what's to worry about

if this was any month after OCT and before APR, it would be as close to a gimme from all the mets as we can get in these parts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

almost 2 days of runs off the Euro showing anywhere from 4-8", now the NAM and GFS are right there with it, what's to worry about

if this was any month after OCT and before APR, it would be as close to a gimme from all the mets as we can get in these parts

Yeah I'd agree theres a huge consensus in the general scheme of things, it would be prep the shovels, and we may still have that but were all skeptical of course man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, I am skeptical, but no more or less than usual for around here, and I guess that's my point

Well, it's been hammered into our heads about climatology, and for good reason. But again, at some point, you gotta go all in if the models are consistent. I dunno...I guess i'm looking for any excuse why this can't happen. Maybe the GFS will crap the bed and bring us all back to reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, it's been hammered into our heads about climatology, and for good reason. But again, at some point, you gotta go all in if the models are consistent. I dunno...I guess i'm looking for any excuse why this can't happen. Maybe the GFS will crap the bed and bring us all back to reality.

even if the there is model consensus, I still think you only go all-in for west and north.....if Germantown/Gaithersburg/Leesburg get 2-3" and Alexandria gets some nonsticking flakes mixed in is it really a busted forecast given how borderline the column is?...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, it's been hammered into our heads about climatology, and for good reason. But again, at some point, you gotta go all in if the models are consistent. I dunno...I guess i'm looking for any excuse why this can't happen. Maybe the GFS will crap the bed and bring us all back to reality.

not this run, I don't think

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...