Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,793
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

Tracking the Late October Potential


stormtracker

Recommended Posts

it seems the odds of breaking the oct record might be up from earlier. ;)

but if you miss (or dont have) the convection youre screwed right?

Sure looks cold after the storm, the 28 degree min record could certainly fall Sunday night. The sounding look almost like the convective scheme might have kicked in with that kind of dry look that they get above 700 mb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1319769843[/url]' post='1068697']

looking at just oct is probably sort of misleading at this point.. clearly early to mid-nov pattern is closer to now than oct 1 most yrs.

but even going into that period you see a lot (edit: well not a lot, bad term for this stat.. but a number) of T or 2-4 3-6 type of numbers.. not necessarily a lot of middle ground tho there is some

Yeah it's just a tough call right now...I won't feel good until I see things actually changing over on Sat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

agreed....If you are going to shove your whole stack in, wait til tomorrow evening....

Tomorrow's 12Z run will probably start us shoving chips in epecially for the western guys but maybe for everyone providing the NAM stays with it's cold west look and the other models don't waffle. I'm surprised how wet it is given the initial low goes so far east but the 850 track is almost ideal. The 500 vort track a little less so than the last run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tomorrow's 12Z run will probably start us shoving chips in epecially for the western guys but maybe for everyone providing the NAM stays with it's cold west look and the other models don't waffle. I'm surprised how wet it is given the initial low goes so far east but the 850 track is almost ideal. The 500 vort track a little less so than the last run.

If the NAM holds at 12z, what would you do? I know you're usually cautious (and with good reason).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see what he's saying, but I agree with you as well.

I mean, how long before we see this until we stop saying "it's October". If I was a LWX, I'd wait until 12z tomorrow.

Good point! That's the problem most forecasters are facing. We're looking at climatology, which we're all taught to do, especially during this time of year. BUT snow is possible in October and there is a first for everything. You gotta be conservative to start, and wait till tomorrow and see what everything is saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will probably stay up for the GFS and Euro.....you will see them tomorrow....I'm still bothered a bit by the date even if the models hammer us.....

only people on weather boards eagerly predict extremely anomalous events days out. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point! That's the problem most forecasters are facing. We're looking at climatology, which we're all taught to do, especially during this time of year. BUT snow is possible in October and there is a first for everything. You gotta be conservative to start, and wait till tomorrow and see what everything is saying.

like i just pointed out we should really compare into nov anyway.. we have an 11.5" storm right around the corner. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the forecast depends on whether you are forecasting for the public or not....If you aren't forecasting for the general public I think you have to hedge given the date....If you are forecasting for the public and there is consensus guidance, you probably have to mention the more extreme impacts that are possible, particularly tree limbs and branches at certain elevations...once you reach a certain elevation it is really no different than being blasted at sea level on 11/11/87 or 11/6/53 so the date is not really an excuse

How much does 1 week really matter though? The abundance of "cold" in the NH varies year by year on relative timing longer than that of 1 week. If it were over 2 days out I could see why progged soundings could be expected to fall more in line with climo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the forecast depends on whether you are forecasting for the public or not....If you aren't forecasting for the general public I think you have to hedge given the date....If you are forecasting for the public and there is consensus guidance, you probably have to mention the more extreme impacts that are possible, particularly tree limbs and branches at certain elevations...once you reach a certain elevation it is really no different than being blasted at sea level on 11/11/87 or 11/6/53 so the date is not really an excuse

I agree for the most part. There's no way I'd be going all in and tweeting/facebooking about 6 to 12" etc. I'd mention the possibility of seeing some snow, with the usual areas to the N and W in line for some potential accumulations. But if the 12z runs hold, I'd ramp it up a bit, but by no means would I rip and read.

if i hadnt seen the nam i'd like dt's forecast a lot.

Yup. It looks reasonable at first glance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...