Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,793
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

Tracking the Late October Potential


stormtracker

Recommended Posts

Posted on Accuweather:

Largest October Snow Events:

--Allentown, Pa.: 2.2 inches on Oct. 31, 1925

--Baltimore, Md.: 2.5 inches on Oct. 30, 1925

--Boston, Mass.: 1.1 inches on Oct. 29, 2005

--Hartford, Conn.: 1.7 inches on Oct. 10, 1979

--Philadelphia, Pa.: 2.1 inches on Oct. 10, 1979

--New York City, N.Y. (Central Park): 0.8 of an inch on Oct. 30, 1925

--Washington, D.C.: 2.0 inches on Oct. 31, 1925

Allentown, Pa., and Hartford, Conn., the cities with the best shot at breaking this record, could also record their first-ever 6-inch or more snowstorm in October.

Also of note, Central Park in New York City has never recorded an inch or more of snow in October since records started being kept in 1869.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I've been so out of the loop -- I literally haven't even looked at a model/forecast/anything since Monday -- have barely even been on the board. Now I wake up to a WSW up here for 4-8," WSW's for Northern MD, "Storm Mode," and a nearly 400 post thread on snow potential. What the hell?

Btw, say what you will, but I'll take our subforum any day of the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

November 6-7, 1953: (only 9 days off!) This is the earliest recorded major snowfall (4 or more inches) with 5.9 inches recorded in Baltimore.

From our weather records here at Millersville 17" in York, PA and 13.5 in Lancaster Some guy on a mountain top outside of Harrisburg got 30".

So Its is possible!... but not likely..

post-741-0-09347600-1319809533.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't know if anyone, especially the mets, put any faith in these maps, but I try to see trends in them. FWIW, heres the new probs map.

I think the key feature of all these maps - whether operational models or probability maps - is the sharp cutoff close to I-95. Based on this, I think it's relatively safe to make forecasts for, say, Winchester VA or Hagerstown MD at this point, the problem is just that a couple of degrees difference could make all the difference in DC/Balt when it comes to bust - and the distance between boom and bust is within the model margins of error. Rather than trying to pin down a number, can't we just leave it at 'slight chance of accumulating snow for I-95 areas, with accumulation likelihood and potential increasing to the west and north'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Closest the 850 line gets to DC is around 16z, looks like it is turning after that. By 18z-19z it is snowing in DC.

Agreed, takes a bit longer to change over than the 6z, but seems to be in line with the ECMWF....great deformation band....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the key feature of all these maps - whether operational models or probability maps - is the sharp cutoff close to I-95. Based on this, I think it's relatively safe to make forecasts for, say, Winchester VA or Hagerstown MD at this point, the problem is just that a couple of degrees difference could make all the difference in DC/Balt when it comes to bust - and the distance between boom and bust is within the model margins of error. Rather than trying to pin down a number, can't we just leave it at 'slight chance of accumulating snow for I-95 areas, with accumulation likelihood and potential increasing to the west and north'?

I think you've stated the reason that this is probably a forecasting nightmare for the areas in and around DC. The forecasters face the wrath of an angry public with either forecast (provided its wrong). I do not envy those guys their jobs on this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...