Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,793
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

Tracking the Late October Potential


stormtracker

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

No but it tends to run warm. Which is why they are warmer then the other models. I don't get your point.

No worries I'm not going to clutter up the thread with my freshman Atmos-Sci knowledge. I guess I feel that given the GFS & the alternative Ukie & NAM which have their own issues that the RGEM & SREF have some support from the American Global model which doesn't have the warm-bias. I don't want to take the NAM or Euro verbatim yet is the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never denied that, nor did I deny that the Euro has a warm surface bias, but the GFS is warmer than both the RGEM & SREF which is why I brought it up. The fact that just because they tend to run warm doesn't mean they're on crack. Just picking the coldest models seems like superficial analysis, you could find a reason why any of the models could be wrong versus the other.

Thanks, love ya :wub:

Who said it was "on crack"? Who is picking the coldest models just because?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The SREFS are not warmer at 3z than 21z ( I am checking at 12z and 18z tomorrow) at the surface. If anything they are a little colder. There is a bit of warmer temps at 850 in the DC - Balt corridor at 18z on the latest 3z run compared to the 21z run.

So what is Bethesdawx talking about then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody is doing this............but biases DO factor in and that's why people are less inclined to accept the RGEM warm solution. Also, the SREF's might have a few members skewing the mean. It's not a single model - it's an ENSEMBLE.

I agree they factor in, but that would be easier to say if it were just the canadian models going for the warmer solution. I'm in my freshman year in Atmospheric Science Department at UMD so I still have just a very basic understanding of the models different tendancies and how they operate, but I'm smart enough to know that the SREF is an ensemble :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me the euro also does not look as good despite the wundergorund lollipop snow products. The vort is not as far south as it was and does not have as good a track for the dc Baltimore corridor. The 06Z GFS actually is too warm for snow and then dry slots. The NAM still has snow at DCA by 15Z. That the gfs has gone warmer is troublesome. Now I'm glad I'm not writing a piece today. Going to need lots of wishy washy language even though we are only 24 hours away from the event. Hopefully, the 12z models will converge towards each other again. This is reminding me of some of the potential systems last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what is Bethesdawx talking about then?

@ 850mb they're warmer in the Ensemble mean, and since surface will be above freezing most likely, 850mb temps & even below do matter. I think looking at basic QPF maps & surface temps is not the way to go, I just find it hard to see the colder solution verify.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me the euro also does not look as good despite the wundergorund lollipop snow products. The vort is not as far south as it was and does not have as good a track for the dc Baltimore corridor. The 06Z GFS actually is too warm for snow and then dry slots. The NAM still has snow at DCA by 15Z. That the gfs has gone warmer is troublesome. Now I'm glad I'm not writing a piece today. Going to need lots of wishy washy language even though we are only 24 hours away from the event. Hopefully, the 12z models will converge towards each other again. This is reminding me of some of the potential systems last year.

Wes -- even with the 42 hr map Earthlight gave me earlier in the thread? I thought it looked okay to me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wes -- even with the 42 hr map Earthlight gave me earlier in the thread? I thought it looked okay to me

I looked at it on the wunderground site and the surface temp at dca looked to be 39 degrees or so through 15Z. The vort also didn't track down near Richmond but looked to me like it was alsmot over us but maybe it's the crappy graphics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me the euro also does not look as good despite the wundergorund lollipop snow products. The vort is not as far south as it was and does not have as good a track for the dc Baltimore corridor. The 06Z GFS actually is too warm for snow and then dry slots. The NAM still has snow at DCA by 15Z. That the gfs has gone warmer is troublesome. Now I'm glad I'm not writing a piece today. Going to need lots of wishy washy language even though we are only 24 hours away from the event. Hopefully, the 12z models will converge towards each other again. This is reminding me of some of the potential systems last year.

the drift north in the models during the last 36-48 hrs. does seem to be a NINA trait

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...