Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

the October snowstorm Ian Disaster its going to be a long winter thread


Ji

Recommended Posts

If anything, the thread at least discusses of the potential low this weekend...which could be big...even if nobody sees snow.

I agree with that.

Those snow maps on Wunderground look very weenie-ish. That's heads up #1. I hope people realize that.

Yeah I was wondering about them earlier. I have not looked at them much. If nothing else a 3 hr panel of snowfall isnt as cool as an event total unless you're talking Feb 5-6 or something. One thing is we don't have a ton of cold air to work with since it's so early, here or to drawn on from the north. I could certainly see someone getting plastered, but not likely someone close to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 989
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think Brian Korty at HPC did put out 2-4 inches for the Veteran's day storm on his mid shift but 24 hrs before the event now one was predicting it.

According to http://localnews.col...aven.com/?p=135 --

"The story begins on the evening of November 10, 1987. A cold high pressure for the time of year was to the north of the D.C. area, while a weak 'upper air disturbance' was forecasted to pass to the south of D.C .overnight which would include the D.C. area in the northern fringe of its limited precipitation shield. The term 'upper air disturbance' was years later confirmed by a University of Maryland climatologist to me as being what I had suspected all along: that the meteorologists don’t know what it actually is and that it is 'up in the air' and is indeed a disturbance since it is producing cloudiness or precipitation, hence the term upper air disturbance. The local National Weather Service (NWS) as well as every local news meteorologist including Bob Ryan of channel 4, Sue Palka of channel 5, and Gordon Barnes of channel 9 predicted flurries for the area that night. The fact that the local news meteorologists went with the NWS is of no surprise because they rarely deviated from the others and actually stated what they were thinking, if anything.

"The next morning, I woke up to an inch of snow on the ground with some continued light snow and flurries. I immediately turned on the TV and my weather radio and found all of the morning meteorologists to be nowcasting. Nowcasting is the term used for when a meteorologist 'forecasts' the weather retroactively by basing his/her forecast on current conditions that were not nearly what was expected. The NWS issued a winter weather advisory for 1-3 inches of snow and the D.C. area had received about two inches. The winter weather advisory for 1-3 inches was a safe bet since it had already occurred and all of the morning television weathermen were on the screen acting as though they had forecasted this 'much' snow . . ."

One footnote to this storm: During 1971-1977, Veterans Day was celebrated on the fourth Monday of October. Had veterans not successfully lobbied during the '70s to move the holiday back to November 11, there were have been several hundred thousand more commuters on the roads in the DC area on November 11, 1987. So, as bad as traffic was that day, gridlock would have been vastly worse had it not been a Federal Government holiday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't know typing lolz could cause such an uproar. The thread is fine, discussing the storm is fine, etc. But it's October and we're doing Euro play by play at d5-6 with people excited that the 12z suite is "locking in" (not to mention the 12z GFS MEX doesnt get anyone to freezing and is in the 50s during the day). It makes me nervous about the winter. There were plenty of legit complaints last winter about how we do things here. If people really thought all we were getting was cold rain for sure this would not be a 200+ post thread after 12 hours. People have an irrational love for snow around here.. it's cool, but let's at least not pretend that's not the case. Regardless, since my first two lolz posts I've managed to throw a lot of reasoning out there.

Just to me and my crappy opinion, it just seems you are a different person than last year and earlier this year. You just seem so very negative with a lot events this year. I agree the thread is fine but so what it is the end of October. Parts of the Mid atlantic region will get snow out of this system, yeah people like jon jon and a few others but it doesnt hurt to discuss it. No one is crying how IMBY. That would just be plain out stupid. i didnt see anyone in here lock in the solution the Euro potrayed or the GFS, it was more like hey look what it is showing, then people were breaking down the what ifs, and what could happen discussion. You make reasonable posts but sometimes you lean more to the negative side instead of discussing the variable options that could roll out in the entire region. You know I like youand Im not trying to be an ass and you are a very knowledgable person wrt wx and know way more than i do it just seems the style of your posts has trended opposite of what I am used to reading from you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with that.

Yeah I was wondering about them earlier. I have not looked at them much. If nothing else a 3 hr panel of snowfall isnt as cool as an event total unless you're talking Feb 5-6 or something. One thing is we don't have a ton of cold air to work with since it's so early, here or to drawn on from the north. I could certainly see someone getting plastered, but not likely someone close to me.

Yeah the 3 hr detail is nice to see.

I just could see people hugging the snow algorithm when it might only give them half of that..if at all. We haven't had a test of it, so tough to really get picky...but some of the totals I saw for this area under very borderline conditions seemed too excessive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah the 3 hr detail is nice to see.

I just could see people hugging the snow algorithm when it might only give them half of that..if at all. We haven't had a test of it, so tough to really get picky...but some of the totals I saw for this area under very borderline conditions seemed too excessive.

The wunderground Euro snow totals will be hard to control this winter. Weenies will love them because their totals look like weenies drew the maps. I can't believe some of the totals it was spitting out today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to me and my crappy opinion, it just seems you are a different person than last year and earlier this year. You just seem so very negative with a lot events this year. I agree the thread is fine but so what it is the end of October. Parts of the Mid atlantic region will get snow out of this system, yeah people like jon jon and a few others but it doesnt hurt to discuss it. No one is crying how IMBY. That would just be plain out stupid. i didnt see anyone in here lock in the solution the Euro potrayed or the GFS, it was more like hey look what it is showing, then people were breaking down the what ifs, and what could happen discussion. You make reasonable posts but sometimes you lean more to the negative side instead of discussing the variable options that could roll out in the entire region. You know I like youand Im not trying to be an ass and you are a very knowledgable person wrt wx and know way more than i do it just seems the style of your posts has trended opposite of what I am used to reading from you.

I'm sorta lost by your post here. Perhaps I've lost it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to http://localnews.col...aven.com/?p=135 --

"The story begins on the evening of November 10, 1987. A cold high pressure for the time of year was to the north of the D.C. area, while a weak 'upper air disturbance' was forecasted to pass to the south of D.C .overnight which would include the D.C. area in the northern fringe of its limited precipitation shield. The term 'upper air disturbance' was years later confirmed by a University of Maryland climatologist to me as being what I had suspected all along: that the meteorologists don’t know what it actually is and that it is 'up in the air' and is indeed a disturbance since it is producing cloudiness or precipitation, hence the term upper air disturbance. The local National Weather Service (NWS) as well as every local news meteorologist including Bob Ryan of channel 4, Sue Palka of channel 5, and Gordon Barnes of channel 9 predicted flurries for the area that night. The fact that the local news meteorologists went with the NWS is of no surprise because they rarely deviated from the others and actually stated what they were thinking, if anything.

"The next morning, I woke up to an inch of snow on the ground with some continued light snow and flurries. I immediately turned on the TV and my weather radio and found all of the morning meteorologists to be nowcasting. Nowcasting is the term used for when a meteorologist 'forecasts' the weather retroactively by basing his/her forecast on current conditions that were not nearly what was expected. The NWS issued a winter weather advisory for 1-3 inches of snow and the D.C. area had received about two inches. The winter weather advisory for 1-3 inches was a safe bet since it had already occurred and all of the morning television weathermen were on the screen acting as though they had forecasted this 'much' snow . . ."

One footnote to this storm: During 1971-1977, Veterans Day was celebrated on the fourth Monday of October. Had veterans not successfully lobbied during the '70s to move the holiday back to November 11, there were have been several hundred thousand more commuters on the roads in the DC area on November 11, 1987. So, as bad as traffic was that day, gridlock would have been vastly worse had it not been a Federal Government holiday.

November 10 1987 it was raining with temps falling thru the 40s all day.

Overnight it fell into the low 30s then the rain changed to snow and we got an inch of snow.

November 11 we had a forecast for a couple inches of snow. It stopped for a while, then started up again and snowed all day and the rest is history - Woodbridge got 11 inches of snow and I was beside myself with joy. I was digging snow and piling it up to embarrassing heights. This was back when I was living with my old friends in the 1980s and I just went out and jebwalked in the snow all day.

1987 was a very good year for snow for us. January 1987 was good for us as well - Jan 22 we got 14 inches, and then 4 days later we got 10 more inches of snow.

thumbsupsmileyanim.gifthumbsupsmileyanim.gifthumbsupsmileyanim.gifthumbsupsmileyanim.gifthumbsupsmileyanim.gifthumbsupsmileyanim.gifthumbsupsmileyanim.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't even seriously think about snow at this point, but it is incredible how the Euro is so dang bullish, if not in our back yards then very close.

I don't know what to think in all honesty.

Here is what i think...its a great time for some humor and fun and general back and forth banter...in the appropriate thread of course..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...