2001kx Posted December 9, 2010 Share Posted December 9, 2010 accuweather.com http://www.accuweather.com/blogs/meteomadness/story/42777/snow-map-is-ready-for-the-big-daddy-storm.asp i accidentally also posted this in the regional forum..so if one needs deleted? i meant to post it here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WNash Posted December 9, 2010 Share Posted December 9, 2010 Classic Henry M. Find DC, Philly, and NYC, and connect the dots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted December 9, 2010 Share Posted December 9, 2010 Classic Henry M. Find DC, Philly, and NYC, and connect the dots. Atleast he only put that area in the coating to an inch, usually he would put it in the atleast 1-3 inch area and then right before the storm change it. This way he keeps up the traffic to the Accuweather site from everyone on the east coast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icebreaker5221 Posted December 9, 2010 Share Posted December 9, 2010 Moderate impact of severe thunderstorms for the majority of the southeast? Not happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellinwood Posted December 9, 2010 Share Posted December 9, 2010 Moderate impact of severe thunderstorms for the majority of the southeast? Not happening. Pretty much what I was thinking when I first saw the map. I've been mentioning embedded thunderstorms in my forecasts, and I might include "and a few severe" tomorrow, but otherwise it looks pretty "meh." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
U_Thant Posted December 9, 2010 Share Posted December 9, 2010 MDT impact of SVR TS into the northern third of FL? Not hardly. The bulk shear profile is only marginally favorable for SVR, and the antecedent moisture is pathetic. Mean PWATs are only 0.5 to 1.0" and TD's starting off in the FOURTIES (yes that's right...the FOURTIES) with almost no time for moisture recovery as the frontal moisture band approaches. I see a fast moving shower band breaking it's teeth on the dry air mass ahead of it. Even NWS JAX isn't forecasting TS, let alone any chance of SVR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billabong Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 Classic Henry M. Find DC, Philly, and NYC, and connect the dots. Since they're on the line, he can say he verified either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 Classic Henry M. Find DC, Philly, and NYC, and connect the dots. Close but if you watched his video today you will know its more so whatever way to give himself snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srain Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 MDT impact of SVR TS into the northern third of FL? Not hardly. The bulk shear profile is only marginally favorable for SVR, and the antecedent moisture is pathetic. Mean PWATs are only 0.5 to 1.0" and TD's starting off in the FOURTIES (yes that's right...the FOURTIES) with almost no time for moisture recovery as the frontal moisture band approaches. I see a fast moving shower band breaking it's teeth on the dry air mass ahead of it. Even NWS JAX isn't forecasting TS, let alone any chance of SVR. KEY only mentioned a line of showers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan76 Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 Comments are priceless under ''maps'' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
U_Thant Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 Henry fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winter_warlock Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 Henry fail. yep henry got this one wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest someguy Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 that implies that at some he doest not. which is a dubious idea at best that Moron went for 3-6" in southern MN??? they got 20"+ great call Henry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Analog96 Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 that implies that at some he doest not. which is a dubious idea at best that Moron went for 3-6" in southern MN??? they got 20"+ great call Henry LOL. I remember working at Accuwx and Henry putting out his maps 6 days before a storm, and then he acted as if that was normal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 that implies that at some he doest not. which is a dubious idea at best that Moron went for 3-6" in southern MN??? they got 20"+ great call Henry Very poor call. In addition to the massive MN bust.. He also went for 3-6" in central WI, which also got 10-18". He went 3-6" for Chicago/Milwaukee areas, which saw 1-3". He went 1-3" for Detroit area, which saw 5-8" He went 0 for St Louis area, which saw 2-4". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest someguy Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 the sole reason why accu wx has him is to make JB look more reasonable Moderate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OSUmetstud Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 the sole reason why accu wx has him is to make JB look more reasonable Moderate ahh...the "ugly friend" lol nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 the sole reason why accu wx has him is to make JB look more reasonable Moderate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.