Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Dec 11-13 MW/Lakes/OV Snow Event? Part III


Chicago Storm

Recommended Posts

Verbatim, it's a good 15 hours of moderate to heavy snow for areas north of I-80 (trowal & deformation), not including initial mix.

http://collaboration...pe_gem_reg.html

Really? For people in Southeastern Wisconsin (especially near the lake), it just looks like a sloppy mess with some back snows.

Edit: that might've been looking at previous runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 994
  • Created
  • Last Reply

GEM takes the low to La Crosse, and moves it ESE. I don't understand why it would move ESE instead of E or NE.

Anyone explain please?

Trough is digging and moving south. the jet is probably sharper, the Gem is also stronger..

when a H5 vort comes out of Eastern New Mexico and cuts to the lakes it is a different situation, this energy is coming off the PNW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well at least for those of us who aren't in the heavy snow band we'll have an interesting arctic frontal passage. May see very quick temp drop offs immediately behind the front. I haven't really even looked all that much into the wind gust potential behind the front, but it sounds pretty substantial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48hrs out on the high res WRF. Looks like a band of showers from northern Indiana south ahead of the front. Heavy snow in Wisconsin.

The wraparound precip in the colder air doesn't move a whole lot between 39 and 48hrs. Basically leaves areas south of I-80 little hope for accumulating snow. Obviously this is just one model though.

A far cry from what looked like a potential widespread blizzard for areas further south at various positions in latitude over the past several days. Given the strong jet dynamics and incoming arctic air I'm left very unimpressed with this whole system. The swath of snow up north will be impressive, but the overall coverage doesn't seem that great to me.

hiresw_ref_048l.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48hrs out on the high res WRF. Looks like a band of showers from northern Indiana south ahead of the front. Heavy snow in Wisconsin.

The wraparound precip in the colder air doesn't move a whole lot between 39 and 48hrs. Basically leaves areas south of I-80 little hope for accumulating snow. Obviously this is just one model though.

A far cry from what looked like a potential widespread blizzard for areas further south at various positions in latitude over the past several days. Given the strong jet dynamics and incoming arctic air I'm left very unimpressed with this whole system. The swath of snow up north will be impressive, but the overall coverage doesn't seem that great to me.

hiresw_ref_048l.gif

This looks BORING!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would call the 00z runs a slight improvement.. Follow along..

The idea ( Mine ) as i have said all along is for the system to close off as it is dropping in and tracking across IL/IN/OH etc.

Here is 48hrs..

GGEM..

00_054_G1_north@america@zoomout_I_4PAN_CLASSIC@012_048.jpg

UK

post-90-0-34697700-1291964246.gif

Euro..

post-90-0-20235100-1291964284.png

This is now at 60hrs. Note the differences. However the euro is going the same way with closing off.

euro..

post-90-0-81547700-1291964308.png

Canadian at 60hrs.. Which does have it closed off over top of Indianapolis.

00_054_G1_north@america@zoomout_I_4PAN_CLASSIC@012_060.jpg

Here is the UK at 60hrs..

post-90-0-16443000-1291964340.gif

Note that at 48 and 60hrs neither the GFS or NAM closes it off. Thus the further nw track.

I'll be really interested to see the euro ensembles. I strongly suspect even more will have it and keep it closed off as it travels across from IA to IL/IN etc. With a close off the surface low is basically trapped as all see on the UK/GGEM and even the euro somewhat but it opens back up which allows the surface low to nudge north. I'll post what they are saying when it rolls out.

Now if models hold true to form ( as they have been acting/behaving this fall ) then i am pretty certain that the 12z runs will be alot closer to the 00z GGEM/UK. They should start heading in that direction anyways.

The battle is between closing off and not closing off. Could make a huge difference in surface low track and ofcourse precip type/warm air getting shunted off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would call the 00z runs a slight improvement.. Follow along..

The idea ( Mine ) as i have said all along is for the system to close off as it is dropping in and tracking across IL/IN/OH etc.

Here is 48hrs..

GGEM..

00_054_G1_north@america@zoomout_I_4PAN_CLASSIC@012_048.jpg

UK

post-90-0-34697700-1291964246.gif

Euro..

post-90-0-20235100-1291964284.png

This is now at 60hrs. Note the differences. However the euro is going the same way with closing off.

euro..

post-90-0-81547700-1291964308.png

Canadian at 60hrs.. Which does have it closed off over top of Indianapolis.

00_054_G1_north@america@zoomout_I_4PAN_CLASSIC@012_060.jpg

Here is the UK at 60hrs..

post-90-0-16443000-1291964340.gif

Note that at 48 and 60hrs neither the GFS or NAM closes it off. Thus the further nw track.

I'll be really interested to see the euro ensembles. I strongly suspect even more will have it and keep it closed off as it travels across from IA to IL/IN etc. With a close off the surface low is basically trapped as all see on the UK/GGEM and even the euro somewhat but it opens back up which allows the surface low to nudge north. I'll post what they are saying when it rolls out.

Now if models hold true to form ( as they have been acting/behaving this fall ) then i am pretty certain that the 12z runs will be alot closer to the 00z GGEM/UK. They should start heading in that direction anyways.

The battle is between closing off and not closing off. Could make a huge difference in surface low track and ofcourse precip type/warm air getting shunted off.

Very nice analysis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm wondering, looking at a couple of models tonight. could the big problem be that it doesn't get enough of a moisture hookup with the GOM, Atlantic, or even Hudson Bay until it's too late for IA. The dynamics appear to be there, but limited moisture from only the great lakes, and particularly lakes superior and michigan is going to be the major factor for Wisconsin, MN, and the UP of MI. that being said, once the feed does kick in, areas from northeastern Ontario to western Quebec near and north of the Laurentians could get a nice haul when it's all said and done from the synoptic system. NWS-Duluth is saying 20-1 for the ratios and i could believe that, if not maybe 25-1. i think, if i am looking at the grid data correct, the twin cities starts at 10-1 and then gradually near 20-1 in the later end of the storm. what is everyone in here speculating for snow ratios for the storm? in different spots

As for the squalls post-departure, any possibility of thundersnow lee-side of the lakes, or is that just not in the cards with lake waters now between +5 to +8C?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...